Copyright
©2009 Baishideng.
World J Hepatol. Oct 31, 2009; 1(1): 8-16
Published online Oct 31, 2009. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v1.i1.8
Published online Oct 31, 2009. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v1.i1.8
Table 1 Systemic chemotherapy
Author | Country and region | Publication year | Treatment schedule | n | RR (%) | PFS (M) | MST (M) | 1yrs (%) |
Falkson et al[7] | USA | 1987 | CDDP 75 mg/sq q3w | 35 | < 17 | - | 3.2 | - |
Okada et al[4] | Japan | 1993 | CDDP 80 mg/sq q4w | 26 | 15.4 | - | - | - |
Nagahama et al[8] | Japan | 1997 | CDDP | 43 | 9.3 | - | - | - |
Ji et al[9] | Korea | 1996 | CDDP 60 mg/sq q4w | 30 | 13.3 | - | 7.6 | 23.5 |
IFN-α 3MU im for 3 mo | ||||||||
Leung et al[10] | China | 2002 | CDDP 20 mg/sq, d1-4 | 149 | 16.8 | - | 7.1 | - |
DXR 40 mg/sq, d1 | ||||||||
5-FU 400 mg/sq, d1-4 | ||||||||
IFN-α 5MU SC d1-4 q3w | ||||||||
Yang et al[11] | Taiwan | 2004 | CDDP 80 mg/sq d1 | 63 | 23.8 | 2.5 | 4.9 | - |
Mitoxantrone 6mg/sq d1 | ||||||||
5-FU 450 mg/sq d1-5 q4w | ||||||||
Ikeda et al[12,13] | Japan | 2008 | CDDP 80 mg/sq d1 | 82 | 22.0 | 3.2 | 11.2 | 43.5 |
(2005) | Mitoxantrone 6 mg/sq d1 | |||||||
5-FU 450 mg/sq d1-5 q4w | ||||||||
Parikh et al[14] | India | 2005 | CDDP 70 mg/sq d1 | 30 | 20.0 | 4.1 | 4.8 | 27.0 |
GEM 1250 mg/sq d1, 8 q3w | ||||||||
Yeo et al[15] | China | 2005 | CDDP 20 mg/sq, d1-4 | 94 | 20.9 | - | 8.7 | 39.0 |
DXR 40 mg/sq, d1 | ||||||||
5-FU 400 mg/sq, d1-4 | ||||||||
IFN-α 5MU. SC d1-4 q3w | ||||||||
Kim et al[16] | Korea | 2006 | CDDP 60 mg/sq d1 | 53 | 16.9 | 2.7 | 5.7 | - |
EPI 50 mg/sq d1 | ||||||||
UFT 400-600 mg/d PO 3w | ||||||||
leucovorin 75 mg/d PO 3w q4w | ||||||||
Park et al[17] | Korea | 2006 | CDDP 60 mg/sq, d1 | 29 | 24.1 | 3.7 | 7.7 | - |
DXR 60 mg/sq, d1 | ||||||||
Capecitabine 2 g/sq per day 2w q3w |
Table 2 Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy
Author | Country and region | Publication year | Treatment schedule | n | RR (%) | PFS (M) | MST (M) | 1yrs (%) | 2yrs (%) | 3yrs (%) | 5yrs (%) |
Court et al[18] | USA | 2002 | CDDP 50 mg/sq (+Radiation) q4w | 67 | 37.0 | - | 10.7 | - | - | - | - |
Yoshikawa et al[19] | Japan | 2008 | CDDP 65 mg/sq q6-8w | 80 | 33.8 | - | - | 67.5 | 50.8 | - | - |
Carr[20] | USA | 2000 | CDDP 125-200 mg/sq q4-8w | 26 | 42.3 | - | 19.5 | - | - | - | - |
Chung et al[21] | Korea | 2000 | CDDP 2 mg/kg q8w | 23 | 14.0 | - | 2.5 | 9 | - | - | - |
CDDP 2 mg/kg q8w | 19 | 33.0 | - | 4.4 | 27 | - | - | - | |||
IFN-α 3MU. SC. 3/w | |||||||||||
Patt et al[22] | USA | 1994 | CDDP 100 mg/sq, d1 | 29 | 41.0 | - | 15.0 | - | - | - | - |
DXR 30-35 mg/sq, d1 | |||||||||||
FUDR 60 mg/sq, d1-4 | |||||||||||
Leucovorin 15 mg/sq, d1-4 | |||||||||||
Toyoda et al[23] | Japan | 1995 | CDDP 5-10 mg/24h, d1-7 | 21 | 14.0 | - | - | 61.1 | - | - | - |
5-FU 500 mg/24h, d1-7 | |||||||||||
Okuda et al[24] | Japan | 1999 | CDDP 10 mg/1h, d1-5 | 31 | 70.9 | - | - | - | - | 45.7 | 45.7 |
5-FU 250 mg/5h, d1-5 q3-6w | |||||||||||
Takayasu et al[25] | Japan | 2000 | EPI 30 mg/sq, d1, 6 | 30 | 42.9 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
CDDP 50 mg/sq, d2,7 | |||||||||||
ETP 60 mg/sq, d3, 4, 5 | |||||||||||
Tanaka et al[26] | Japan | 2000 | CDDP 10 mg/1h, d1-5 | 77 | 45.5 | - | - | 55.8 | 27.6 | 18.3 | - |
5-FU 250 mg/5h, d1-5 q4w | |||||||||||
Ando et al[27] | Japan | 2002 | CDDP 7 mg/sq 1h, d1-5 | 48 | 47.9 | - | 10.2 | - | - | - | - |
5-FU 170 mg/sq 5h, d1-5 x4w | |||||||||||
Kaneko et al[28] | Japan | 2002 | CDDP 75 mg/sq, d1, 15 | 34 | 45.0 | - | - | 24 | - | - | - |
5-FU 750 mg/sq, d1, 8, 15, 22 | |||||||||||
MTX 30 mg/sq, d1, 8, 15, 22 | |||||||||||
leucovorin 30 mg/sq, d1, 8, 15, 22 | |||||||||||
IFN-α-2b 3MU. SC, 3/w q4w | |||||||||||
Sumie et al[29] | Japan | 2003 | CDDP 10 mg/1h, d1-5 | 16 | 56.3 | - | 32.4 | - | - | - | - |
5-FU 250 mg/5h, d1-5 x4w | |||||||||||
Tanioka et al[30] | Japan | 2003 | CDDP 3 mg/sq 0.5 h, d1-7 | 38 | 47.4 | - | 6.1 | - | - | - | - |
5-FU 170 mg/sq continuous d1-7 | |||||||||||
x4w q5w | |||||||||||
Lin et al[31] | Taiwan | 2004 | CDDP 10 mg/sq d1-5 | 53 | 28.3 | - | 13.2 | - | - | - | - |
MMC 2 mg/sq d1-5 | |||||||||||
leucovorin 15 mg/sq d1-5 | |||||||||||
5-FU 100 mg/sq continuous d1-5 | |||||||||||
x2w q3-4w | |||||||||||
Yamasaki et al[32] | Japan | 2005 | CDDP 10 mg/body d1-5 | 29 | 48.3 | - | 11.8 | - | - | - | - |
5-FU 250 mg/body d1-5 | |||||||||||
leucovorin 12 mg(or isovorin 12.5 or 6.25 mg) d1-5 | |||||||||||
Nagai et al[33] | Japan | 2007 | CDDP 10 mg/h d1-5 | 37 | 6.7 vs 31.8 | - | 7.4 vs 16.3 | - | - | - | - |
leucovorin 12 mg/h d1-5 | (15 vs 22) | ||||||||||
5-FU 250 mg/sq (4 h vs 22 h) | |||||||||||
x4w | |||||||||||
Park et al[34] | Korea | 2007 | 5-FU 500 mg/sq d1-3 q4w | 41 | 22.0 | 7 | 12.0 | - | - | - | - |
CDDP 60 mg/sq d2 |
Table 3 Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (inc. transcatheter arterial infusion with lipiodol)
Author | Country | Publicationyear | Treatment schedule | Root | n | RR (%) | MST (M) | 1yrs (%) | 2yrs (%) | 3yrs (%) | 5yrs (%) |
Ikeda et al[40] | Japan | 1992 | DXR/Lip 10.5 mg1 | Lip-TAI | 76 | 23.7 | - | 68.0 | 41.0 | 24.0 | - |
MMC/Lip 7.8 mg1 Lip 3.7 mL1 | |||||||||||
CDDP 135.7 mg1 | |||||||||||
Yodono et al[41] | Japan | 1992 | CDDP 20 mg/sq, d1-5 | TAI | 14 | 46.2 | 27.6 | 50.0 | 43.0 | 34.0 | - |
ETP 30-40 mg/sq, d1-5 | +Lip-TACE | ||||||||||
5-FU 250 mg/body, d1-26 + CDDP/Lip + GS | |||||||||||
CDDP 50 mg/sq, d2,8 | TAI | 31 | 48.4 | 21.7 | 77.0 | 42.0 | - | - | |||
ETP 50-60 mg/sq, d4-6 | +Lip-TACE | ||||||||||
DXR 20 mg/sq, d1,7 + CDDP/Lip + GS | |||||||||||
Hatanaka et al[42] | Japan | 1995 | CDDP 50-100 mg | TACE | 60 | - | - | 80.4 | 65.2 | 48.6 | - |
DXR 20-40 mg | |||||||||||
FUDR 3-5 g + GS | |||||||||||
CDDP 50-100 mg | Lip-TACE | 78 | - | - | 86.3 | 55.3 | 34.8 | - | |||
DXR 20-40 mg Lip 4.8 mL1 | |||||||||||
FUDR 3-5 g + GS | |||||||||||
CDDP 50-100 mg | Lip-TAI | 159 | - | - | 65.9 | 50.3 | 36.2 | - | |||
DXR 20-40 mg Lip 4.9 mL1 | |||||||||||
FUDR 3-5 g | |||||||||||
Raoul et al[43] | France | 1997 | CDDP 70 mg (saline 140 mL)/Lip 10 mL + GS | Lip-TACE | 64 | 57.0 | - | 42.2 | 22.1 | 2.8 | - |
Carr[20] | USA | 2002 | CDDP 125-200 mg/sq q4-8w + GS | TACE | 31 | 58.1 | 30.7 | - | - | - | - |
Shibata et al[44] | Japan | 1989 | CDDP 20-150 mg (CDDP/Lip: 20 mg/mL) | Lip-TAI | 71 | 46.5 | - | 55.0 | - | - | - |
Kawakami et al[45] | Japan | 1993 | CDDP 50 mg (CDDP/Lip: 10 mg/mL) | Lip-TAI | 12 | 12.5 | 7.0 | - | - | - | - |
CDDP 50 mg (CDDP/Lip: 10 mg/mL) + GS | Lip-TACE | 30 | 45.5 | 25 | 81.3 | 56.8 | - | - | |||
Ono et al[46] | Japan | 2000 | CDDP 50 mg1 (CDDP/Lip: 10 mg/mL) + GS | Lip-TACE | 38 | 45.0 | - | - | 49.0 | - | 19.0 |
DXR 43 mg1 (20-50 mg)/Lip + GS | Lip-TACE | 46 | 38.0 | - | - | 31.0 | - | 6.0 | |||
Kamada et al[47] | Japan | 2001 | CDDP 41 mg1 (15-70 mg)/Lip + GS | Lip-TACE | 108 | 15.0 | 24.0 | 81.0 | - | 41.0 | 19.0 |
(CDDP/Lip: 10 mg/mL) | or Lip-TAI | ||||||||||
DXR 57mg1 (20-100 mg)/Lip + GS | Lip-TACE or Lip-TAI | 26 | 4.0 | 17.0 | 67.0 | - | 18.0 | 0.0 | |||
Maeda et al[48] | Japan | 2003 | CDDP 70.5 mg1/Lip | Lip-TAI | 143 | 57.3 | - | 89.2 | 65.3 | 48.8 | 29.6 |
(CDDP/Lip: 20 mg/mL) | |||||||||||
CDDP 78.4 mg1/Lip + GS | Lip-TACE | 96 | 62.5 | - | 85.2 | 67.0 | 48.7 | 24.2 | |||
(CDDP/Lip: 20 mg/mL) | |||||||||||
Ikeda et al[5,6] | Japan | 2009 | CDDP 50 mg1 (20-150 mg)/Lip | Lip-TAI | 94 | 51.1 | 30.0 | 81.6 | 65.2 | 39.8 | 18.3 |
-2004 | (CDDP/Lip: 20 mg/mL) | ||||||||||
CDDP 70 mg1 (30-150 mg)/Lip + GS | Lip-TACE | 74 | 73.0 | 37.2 | 87.8 | - | 52.2 | 25.0 | |||
(CDDP/Lip: 20mg/mL) | |||||||||||
Uyama et al[49] | Japan | 2008 | CDDP80 mg1 /Lip (40-100mg) + GS | Lip-TACE | 24 | 45.8 | - | - | - | - | - |
(CDDP/Lip: 20 mg/mL) | |||||||||||
Yamashita et al[50] | Japan | 2009 | CDDP 35 mg/sq | Lip-TAI | 35 | 57.1 | - | - | - | - | - |
(CDDP/Lip: 10-20 mg/mL) |
Table 4 Randomized control trial (TACE)
Author | Country and region | Publication year | Treatment schedule | Root | n | RR (%) | 1yrs (%) | 2yrs (%) | 3yrs (%) |
Group d'Etude | France | 1995 | CDDP/Lip (70 mg/10 mL) + GS | Lip-TACE | 50 | 16.3 | 62.0 | 37.8 | - |
et de Traitment | |||||||||
du Carcinome | |||||||||
Hepatocellulaire[51] | Conservative management | - | 46 | 5.0 | 43.5 | 26.0 | - | ||
Lo et al[39] | Hong Kong | 2002 | CDDP/saline + Lip (1:1), | Lip-TACE | 40 | 39.0 | 57.0 | 31.0 | 26.0 |
(median: 10 mg/20 mL/body | |||||||||
max: 30 mg/60 mL/body) + GS | |||||||||
conservative management | - | 39 | 6.0 | 32.0 | 11.0 | 3.0 |
- Citation: Ishikawa T. Future perspectives on the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with cisplatin. World J Hepatol 2009; 1(1): 8-16
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v1/i1/8.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v1.i1.8