Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Hepatol. Sep 27, 2014; 6(9): 660-669
Published online Sep 27, 2014. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v6.i9.660
Published online Sep 27, 2014. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v6.i9.660
Figure 1 Sustained virological response.
A: Influence of rapid virological response on sustained virological response. Patients with rapid virological response (RVR) vs patients without RVR, bP < 0.001; B: Influence of response to previous treatment on sustained virological response. Prior relapsers vs prior null-responders, aP < 0.05. Sustained virological response was analyzed 24 wk after treatment withdrawal for 122 patients (overall numbers of patients: 88 in the telaprevir group, 34 in the boceprevir group).
Figure 2 Diagnostic value of liver stiffness measurement to predict sustained virological response.
The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.64 (0.52-0.76).
- Citation: Bonnet D, Guivarch M, Bérard E, Combis JM, Remy AJ, Glibert A, Payen JL, Metivier S, Barange K, Desmorat H, Palacin A, Nicot F, Abravanel F, Alric L. Telaprevir- and boceprevir-based tritherapies in real practice for F3-F4 pretreated hepatitis C virus patients. World J Hepatol 2014; 6(9): 660-669
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v6/i9/660.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v6.i9.660