Case Report
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Hepatol. Sep 27, 2024; 16(9): 1289-1296
Published online Sep 27, 2024. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v16.i9.1289
Figure 1
Figure 1 Computer tomography (September 29, 2023). A: Slightly increased density which merge with liver, boundary is clear; B: Decreased density which covered about 8.8 mm × 8.6 mm closed to the edge of the liver.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Enhanced computed tomography scan (September 30, 2023): No enhancement in the lesion.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Magnetic resonance imaging (October 2, 2023). A: Axial scan: The high signal (white arrow) was seemingly under the capsule of liver; B: Coronal scan: The lesion (white arrow) was closer to diaphragm.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Bilateral uterine adnexa. A: Right fallopian tube and ovary; B: Left fallopian tube and ovary.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Adherent tissue (arrow) and a little bleeding on the diaphragm surface.
Figure 6
Figure 6 Blood clots around the adherent tissue. A: Blood clot under the diaphragm; B: Histologic section of the clot (hematoxylin and eosin, original magnification × 10).
Figure 7
Figure 7 Implantation site (white arrow) and gray tissue mass (black arrow).
Figure 8
Figure 8 The histologic sections of specimen both derived from the first tissue. A: trophoblast cell (hematoxylin and eosin, original magnification × 40); B: Liver (hematoxylin and eosin, original magnification × 40).
Figure 9
Figure 9 Histologic section of specimen derived from the third tissue. Chorionic villi (hematoxylin and eosin, original magnification × 100).