BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Schmitd LB, Liu M, Scanlon CS, Banerjee R, D'Silva NJ. The Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane In Vivo Model to Assess Perineural Invasion in Head and Neck Cancer. J Vis Exp 2019. [PMID: 31282878 DOI: 10.3791/59296] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Laborda-Illanes A, Sánchez-Alcoholado L, Castellano-Castillo D, Boutriq S, Plaza-Andrades I, Aranega-Martín L, Peralta-Linero J, Alba E, González-González A, Queipo-Ortuño MI. Development of in vitro and in vivo tools to evaluate the antiangiogenic potential of melatonin to neutralize the angiogenic effects of VEGF and breast cancer cells: CAM assay and 3D endothelial cell spheroids. Biomed Pharmacother 2023;157:114041. [PMID: 36423543 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.114041] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Diržiuvienė R, Šlekienė L, Palubinskienė J, Balnytė I, Lasienė K, Stakišaitis D, Valančiūtė A. Tumors derived from lung cancer cells respond differently to treatment with sodium valproate (a HDAC inhibitor) in a chicken embryo chorioallantoic membrane model. Histol Histopathol 2022;37:1201-12. [PMID: 35703146 DOI: 10.14670/HH-18-482] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Rupp T, Legrand C, Hunault M, Genest L, Babin D, Froget G, Castagné V. A Face-To-Face Comparison of Tumor Chicken Chorioallantoic Membrane (TCAM) In Ovo with Murine Models for Early Evaluation of Cancer Therapy and Early Drug Toxicity. Cancers 2022;14:3548. [DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143548] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Claridge SE, Cavallo J, Hopkins BD. Patient-Derived In Vitro and In Vivo Models of Cancer. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-91836-1_12] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Francisco I, Vale F, Martin V, Fernandes MH, Gomes PS. From Blood to Bone-The Osteogenic Activity of L-PRF Membranes on the Ex Vivo Embryonic Chick Femur Development Model. Materials (Basel) 2021;14:7830. [PMID: 34947427 DOI: 10.3390/ma14247830] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Schmitd LB, Perez-Pacheco C, D'Silva NJ. Nerve density in cancer: Less is better. FASEB Bioadv 2021;3:773-86. [PMID: 34632313 DOI: 10.1096/fba.2021-00046] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Kundeková B, Máčajová M, Meta M, Čavarga I, Bilčík B. Chorioallantoic Membrane Models of Various Avian Species: Differences and Applications. Biology (Basel) 2021;10:301. [PMID: 33917385 DOI: 10.3390/biology10040301] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Salvo E, Campana WM, Scheff NN, Nguyen TH, Jeong SH, Wall I, Wu AK, Zhang S, Kim H, Bhattacharya A, Janal MN, Liu C, Albertson DG, Schmidt BL, Dolan JC, Schmidt RE, Boada MD, Ye Y. Peripheral nerve injury and sensitization underlie pain associated with oral cancer perineural invasion. Pain 2020;161:2592-602. [PMID: 32658150 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001986] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Marshall KM, Kanczler JM, Oreffo RO. Evolving applications of the egg: chorioallantoic membrane assay and ex vivo organotypic culture of materials for bone tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng 2020;11:2041731420942734. [PMID: 33194169 DOI: 10.1177/2041731420942734] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Trus I, Berube N, Jiang P, Rak J, Gerdts V, Karniychuk U. Zika Virus with Increased CpG Dinucleotide Frequencies Shows Oncolytic Activity in Glioblastoma Stem Cells. Viruses 2020;12:E579. [PMID: 32466170 DOI: 10.3390/v12050579] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]