BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Ihalainen TM, Lönnroth NT, Peltonen JI, Uusi-Simola JK, Timonen MH, Kuusela LJ, Savolainen SE, Sipilä OE. MRI quality assurance using the ACR phantom in a multi-unit imaging center. Acta Oncol 2011;50:966-72. [PMID: 21767198 DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2011.582515] [Cited by in Crossref: 40] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 34] [Article Influence: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Hong H, Seoung Y. Comparison of quantitative imaging parameters between two different types of stationary and mobile magnetic resonance imaging. J Korean Phys Soc . [DOI: 10.1007/s40042-022-00566-z] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Nigri A, Ferraro S, Gandini Wheeler-kingshott CAM, Tosetti M, Redolfi A, Forloni G, D'angelo E, Aquino D, Biagi L, Bosco P, Carne I, De Francesco S, Demichelis G, Gianeri R, Lagana MM, Micotti E, Napolitano A, Palesi F, Pirastru A, Savini G, Alberici E, Amato C, Arrigoni F, Baglio F, Bozzali M, Castellano A, Cavaliere C, Contarino VE, Ferrazzi G, Gaudino S, Marino S, Manzo V, Pavone L, Politi LS, Roccatagliata L, Rognone E, Rossi A, Tonon C, Lodi R, Tagliavini F, Bruzzone MG; The RIN–Neuroimaging. Quantitative MRI Harmonization to Maximize Clinical Impact: The RIN–Neuroimaging Network. Front Neurol 2022;13:855125. [DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.855125] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Yongabi D, Mertens N, Peeters R. Reproducibility of T1 relaxation times in diagnostic MRI: A phantom study. Physics in Medicine 2021;12:100038. [DOI: 10.1016/j.phmed.2021.100038] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Wood S, Santini T, Krishnamurthy N, Martins T, Farhat N, Ibrahim TS. A comprehensive electromagnetic evaluation of an MRI anthropomorphic head phantom. NMR Biomed 2021;34:e4441. [PMID: 33354828 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4441] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Epistatou AC, Tsalafoutas IA, Delibasis KK. An Automated Method for Quality Control in MRI Systems: Methods and Considerations. J Imaging 2020;6:111. [PMID: 34460552 DOI: 10.3390/jimaging6100111] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Kanniyappan U, Wang B, Yang C, Ghassemi P, Litorja M, Suresh N, Wang Q, Chen Y, Pfefer TJ. Performance test methods for near-infrared fluorescence imaging. Med Phys 2020;47:3389-401. [PMID: 32304583 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14189] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Yang X, Little K, Jiang X, Hintenlang D. Improvement in MR quality control workflow and outcomes with a web-based database. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020;21:98-104. [PMID: 32306453 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12879] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Adjeiwaah M, Garpebring A, Nyholm T. Sensitivity analysis of different quality assurance methods for magnetic resonance imaging in radiotherapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2020;13:21-7. [PMID: 33458303 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2020.03.001] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Tajik D, Trac J, Nikolova NK. Quality Control of Microwave Equipment for Tissue Imaging. IEEE J Electromagn RF Microw Med Biol 2020;4:52-60. [DOI: 10.1109/jerm.2019.2925599] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Prohl AK, Scherrer B, Tomas-Fernandez X, Filip-Dhima R, Kapur K, Velasco-Annis C, Clancy S, Carmody E, Dean M, Valle M, Prabhu SP, Peters JM, Bebin EM, Krueger DA, Northrup H, Wu JY, Sahin M, Warfield SK. Reproducibility of Structural and Diffusion Tensor Imaging in the TACERN Multi-Center Study. Front Integr Neurosci 2019;13:24. [PMID: 31417372 DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2019.00024] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Bier EA, Nouls JC, Wang Z, He M, Schrank G, Morales-Medina N, Hashoian R, Svetlik H, Mugler JP 3rd, Driehuys B. A thermally polarized 129 Xe phantom for quality assurance in multi-center hyperpolarized gas MRI studies. Magn Reson Med 2019;82:1961-8. [PMID: 31218753 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27836] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Triphan SMF, Biederer J, Burmester K, Fellhauer I, Vogelmeier CF, Jörres RA, Kauczor HU, Heußel CP, Wielpütz MO, Jobst BJ. Design and application of an MR reference phantom for multicentre lung imaging trials. PLoS One 2018;13:e0199148. [PMID: 29975714 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199148] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Peltonen JI, Mäkelä T, Sofiev A, Salli E. An Automatic Image Processing Workflow for Daily Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quality Assurance. J Digit Imaging 2017;30:163-71. [PMID: 27834027 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-016-9919-4] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Guerri S, Mercatelli D, Aparisi Gómez MP, Napoli A, Battista G, Guglielmi G, Bazzocchi A. Quantitative imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis and sarcopenia. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2018;8:60-85. [PMID: 29541624 DOI: 10.21037/qims.2018.01.05] [Cited by in Crossref: 29] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 47] [Article Influence: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
15 Pappas EP, Alshanqity M, Moutsatsos A, Lababidi H, Alsafi K, Georgiou K, Karaiskos P, Georgiou E. MRI-Related Geometric Distortions in Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treatment Planning: Evaluation and Dosimetric Impact. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2017;16:1120-9. [PMID: 29332453 DOI: 10.1177/1533034617735454] [Cited by in Crossref: 27] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 28] [Article Influence: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
16 Wong OL, Yuan J, Yu SK, Cheung KY. Image quality assessment of a 1.5T dedicated magnetic resonance-simulator for radiotherapy with a flexible radio frequency coil setting using the standard American College of Radiology magnetic resonance imaging phantom test. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2017;7:205-14. [PMID: 28516046 DOI: 10.21037/qims.2017.02.08] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
17 Etman H, Mokhtar A, Abd-elhamid M, Ahmed M, El-diasty T. The effect of quality control on the function of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), using American College of Radiology (ACR) phantom. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine 2017;48:153-60. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrnm.2016.12.003] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
18 Kousi E, Borri M, Dean J, Panek R, Scurr E, Leach MO, Schmidt MA. Quality assurance in MRI breast screening: comparing signal-to-noise ratio in dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging protocols. Phys Med Biol 2016;61:37-49. [PMID: 26605957 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/1/37] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
19 Saenz DL, Yan Y, Christensen N, Henzler MA, Forrest LJ, Bayouth JE, Paliwal BR. Characterization of a 0.35T MR system for phantom image quality stability and in vivo assessment of motion quantification. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2015;16:30-40. [PMID: 26699552 DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i6.5353] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
20 Qiu J, Wang G, Min J, Wang X, Wang P. Testing the quality of images for permanent magnet desktop MRI systems using specially designed phantoms. Phys Med Biol 2013;58:8677-87. [PMID: 24263463 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/24/8677] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
21 Hellerbach A, Schuster V, Jansen A, Sommer J. MRI phantoms - are there alternatives to agar? PLoS One 2013;8:e70343. [PMID: 23940563 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070343] [Cited by in Crossref: 59] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 51] [Article Influence: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
22 Muren LP, Glimelius B. And they lived happily ever after… The marriage of Nordic Association for Clinical Physics and Acta Oncologica. Acta Oncol 2011;50:835-7. [PMID: 21767182 DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2011.590527] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]