BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Xu C, Li X, Shi Y, Wang B, Sun H. Combinative evaluation of primary tumor and lymph nodes to predict pelvic lymphatic metastasis in cervical cancer: an integrated PET-IVIM MRI study. Cancer Imaging 2020;20:21. [PMID: 32143736 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-020-00298-y] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Dolciami M, Capuani S, Celli V, Maiuro A, Pernazza A, Palaia I, Di Donato V, Santangelo G, Rizzo SMR, Ricci P, Della Rocca C, Catalano C, Manganaro L. Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) MR Quantification in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer (LACC): Preliminary Study on Assessment of Tumor Aggressiveness and Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. JPM 2022;12:638. [DOI: 10.3390/jpm12040638] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Zhang Y, Hu Y, Zhao S, Cui C. The Utility of PET/CT Metabolic Parameters Measured Based on Fixed Percentage Threshold of SUVmax and Adaptive Iterative Algorithm in the New Revised FIGO Staging System for Stage III Cervical Cancer. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021;8:680072. [PMID: 34395472 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.680072] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Olthof EP, van der Aa MA, Adam JA, Stalpers LJA, Wenzel HHB, van der Velden J, Mom CH. The role of lymph nodes in cervical cancer: incidence and identification of lymph node metastases-a literature review. Int J Clin Oncol 2021;26:1600-10. [PMID: 34241726 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-01980-2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Song J, Hu Q, Ma Z, Zhao M, Chen T, Shi H. Feasibility of T2WI-MRI-based radiomics nomogram for predicting normal-sized pelvic lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer patients. Eur Radiol 2021;31:6938-48. [PMID: 33585992 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07735-x] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Steiner A, Narva S, Rinta-Kiikka I, Hietanen S, Hynninen J, Virtanen J. Diagnostic efficiency of whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI, MRI alone, and SUV and ADC values in staging of primary uterine cervical cancer. Cancer Imaging 2021;21:16. [PMID: 33482909 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-020-00372-5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Garau LM, Niccoli-asabella A, Ferrari C, Sardaro A, Pisani A, Rubini G. The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in endometrial adenocarcinoma: a review of the literature and recent advances. Clin Transl Imaging 2020;8:357-64. [DOI: 10.1007/s40336-020-00385-x] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]