BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Sundby A, Boolsen MW, Burgdorf KS, Ullum H, Hansen TF, Mors O. Attitudes of stakeholders in psychiatry towards the inclusion of children in genomic research. Hum Genomics 2018;12:12. [PMID: 29506557 DOI: 10.1186/s40246-018-0144-8] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Strohmaier J, Witt SH, Frank J, Lemme N, Flatau L, Streit F, Foo JC, Reitt M, Rujescu D, Schulze TG, Lanzerath D, Illes F, Degenhardt F, Rietschel M. Attitudes toward the right to autonomous decision-making in psychiatric genetic testing: Controversial and context-dependent. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2019;180:555-65. [PMID: 30912305 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32724] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Vears DF, Minion JT, Roberts SJ, Cummings J, Machirori M, Murtagh MJ. Views on genomic research result delivery methods and informed consent: a review. Per Med 2021;18:295-310. [PMID: 33822658 DOI: 10.2217/pme-2020-0139] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Lázaro-Muñoz G, Torgerson L, Pereira S. Return of results in a global survey of psychiatric genetics researchers: practices, attitudes, and knowledge. Genet Med 2021;23:298-305. [PMID: 33033403 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-00986-x] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Garrett JR, Lantos JD, Biesecker LG, Childerhose JE, Chung WK, Holm IA, Koenig BA, McEwen JE, Wilfond BS, Brothers K; Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) Consortium Pediatrics Working Group. Rethinking the "open future" argument against predictive genetic testing of children. Genet Med 2019;21:2190-8. [PMID: 30894702 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0483-4] [Cited by in Crossref: 19] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Kostick K, Pereira S, Brannan C, Torgerson L, Lázaro-Muñoz G. Psychiatric genomics researchers' perspectives on best practices for returning results to individual participants. Genet Med 2020;22:345-52. [PMID: 31477844 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0642-7] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Macpherson I, Roqué MV, Segarra I. Ethical Challenges of Germline Genetic Enhancement. Front Genet 2019;10:767. [PMID: 31552088 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00767] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Mezinska S, Gallagher L, Verbrugge M, Bunnik EM. Ethical issues in genomics research on neurodevelopmental disorders: a critical interpretive review. Hum Genomics 2021;15:16. [PMID: 33712057 DOI: 10.1186/s40246-021-00317-4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Kostick KM, Brannan C, Pereira S, Lázaro-Muñoz G. Psychiatric genetics researchers' views on offering return of results to individual participants. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2019;180:589-600. [PMID: 30358063 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32682] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Martinez-Martin N, Greely HT, Cho MK. Ethical Development of Digital Phenotyping Tools for Mental Health Applications: Delphi Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9:e27343. [PMID: 34319252 DOI: 10.2196/27343] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Sundby A, Boolsen MW, Burgdorf KS, Ullum H, Hansen TF, Middleton A, Mors O. The preferences of potential stakeholders in psychiatric genomic research regarding consent procedures and information delivery. Eur Psychiatry 2019;55:29-35. [PMID: 30384109 DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.09.005] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Vears DF, Minion JT, Roberts SJ, Cummings J, Machirori M, Blell M, Budin-Ljøsne I, Cowley L, Dyke SOM, Gaff C, Green R, Hall A, Johns AL, Knoppers BM, Mulrine S, Patch C, Winkler E, Murtagh MJ. Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives. PLoS One 2021;16:e0258646. [PMID: 34748551 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258646] [Reference Citation Analysis]