BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Johnston W, Judice PB, Molina García P, Mühlen JM, Lykke Skovgaard E, Stang J, Schumann M, Cheng S, Bloch W, Brønd JC, Ekelund U, Grøntved A, Caulfield B, Ortega FB, Sardinha LB. Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable and smartphone step count: expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE network. Br J Sports Med 2021;55:780-93. [PMID: 33361276 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103147] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Giurgiu M, Kolb S, Nigg C, Burchartz A, Timm I, Becker M, Rulf E, Doster AK, Koch E, Bussmann JBJ, Nigg C, Ebner-Priemer UW, Woll A. Assessment of 24-hour physical behaviour in children and adolescents via wearables: a systematic review of free-living validation studies. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2022;8:e001267. [PMID: 35646389 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001267] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Argent R, Hetherington-Rauth M, Stang J, Tarp J, Ortega FB, Molina-Garcia P, Schumann M, Bloch W, Cheng S, Grøntved A, Brønd JC, Ekelund U, Sardinha LB, Caulfield B. Recommendations for Determining the Validity of Consumer Wearables and Smartphones for the Estimation of Energy Expenditure: Expert Statement and Checklist of the INTERLIVE Network. Sports Med 2022. [PMID: 35260991 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-022-01665-4] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 O’brien MW. Implications and Recommendations for Equivalence Testing in Measures of Movement Behaviors: A Scoping Review. Journal for the Measurement of Physical Behaviour 2021;4:353-62. [DOI: 10.1123/jmpb.2021-0021] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Chan A, Chan D, Lee H, Chin Ng C, Hui Ling Yeo A. Reporting adherence, validity and physical activity measures of wearable activity trackers in medical research: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104696] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Konda S, Ogasawara I, Fujita K, Aoyama C, Yokoyama T, Magome T, Yulong C, Hashizume K, Matsuo T, Nakata K. Variability in Physical Inactivity Responses of University Students during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Monitoring of Daily Step Counts Using a Smartphone Application. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19:1958. [PMID: 35206149 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19041958] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Kastelic K, Dobnik M, Löfler S, Hofer C, Šarabon N. Validity, Reliability and Sensitivity to Change of Three Consumer-Grade Activity Trackers in Controlled and Free-Living Conditions among Older Adults. Sensors (Basel) 2021;21:6245. [PMID: 34577457 DOI: 10.3390/s21186245] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Adamakis M. Criterion Validity of iOS and Android Applications to Measure Steps and Distance in Adults. Technologies 2021;9:55. [DOI: 10.3390/technologies9030055] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Shei RJ, Holder IG, Oumsang AS, Paris BA, Paris HL. Wearable activity trackers-advanced technology or advanced marketing? Eur J Appl Physiol 2022. [PMID: 35445837 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-022-04951-1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Giurgiu M, Timm I, Becker M, Schmidt S, Wunsch K, Nissen R, Davidovski D, Bussmann JBJ, Nigg CR, Reichert M, Ebner-Priemer UW, Woll A, von Haaren-Mack B. Quality Evaluation of Free-living Validation Studies for the Assessment of 24-Hour Physical Behavior in Adults via Wearables: Systematic Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2022;10:e36377. [PMID: 35679106 DOI: 10.2196/36377] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]