BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Hattori K, Ikemoto Y, Takao W, Ohno S, Harimoto T, Kanazawa S, Oita M, Shibuya K, Kuroda M, Kato H. Development of MRI phantom equivalent to human tissues for 3.0-T MRI. Med Phys 2013;40:032303. [PMID: 23464335 DOI: 10.1118/1.4790023] [Cited by in Crossref: 38] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30] [Article Influence: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Elter A, Hellwich E, Dorsch S, Schäfer M, Runz A, Klüter S, Ackermann B, Brons S, Karger CP, Mann P. Development of phantom materials with independently adjustable CT- and MR-contrast at 0.35, 1.5 and 3 T. Phys Med Biol 2021;66:045013. [PMID: 33333496 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abd4b9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Sękowska A, Majchrowicz D, Sabisz A, Ficek M, Bułło-Piontecka B, Kosowska M, Jing L, Bogdanowicz R, Szczerska M. Nanodiamond phantoms mimicking human liver: perspective to calibration of T1 relaxation time in magnetic resonance imaging. Sci Rep 2020;10:6446. [PMID: 32296116 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-63581-9] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Colucci LA, Corapi KM, Li M, Parada XV, Allegretti AS, Lin HY, Ausiello DA, Rosen MS, Cima MJ. Fluid assessment in dialysis patients by point-of-care magnetic relaxometry. Sci Transl Med 2019;11:eaau1749. [PMID: 31341060 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aau1749] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Woletz M, Roat S, Hummer A, Tik M, Windischberger C. Technical Note: Human tissue-equivalent MRI phantom preparation for 3 and 7 Tesla. Med Phys 2021;48:4387-94. [PMID: 34018625 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14986] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Zhang H, Hou K, Chen J, Dyer BA, Chen JC, Liu X, Zhang F, Rong Y, Qiu J. Fabrication of an anthropomorphic heterogeneous mouse phantom for multimodality medical imaging. Phys Med Biol 2018;63:195011. [PMID: 30183686 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aadf2b] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Er WX, Lim WJ, Dwihapsari Y, Awang MNA, Yusoff AN. Signal-to-noise ratio uniformity and stability of agar gel phantom with iron (III) oxide as relaxation modifier. Beni-Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci 2021;10. [DOI: 10.1186/s43088-021-00173-0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Crasto N, Kirubarajan A, Sussman D. Anthropomorphic brain phantoms for use in MRI systems: a systematic review. MAGMA 2021. [PMID: 34463866 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-021-00953-w] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Filippou V, Tsoumpas C. Recent advances on the development of phantoms using 3D printing for imaging with CT, MRI, PET, SPECT, and ultrasound. Med Phys 2018. [PMID: 29933508 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13058] [Cited by in Crossref: 77] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 51] [Article Influence: 19.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Lim S, Woo C, Kim S, Choe B, Woo D. Radiofrequency Coil Design for in vivo Sodium Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Mouse Kidney at 9.4T. Investig Magn Reson Imaging 2018;22:65. [DOI: 10.13104/imri.2018.22.1.65] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Lennie E, Tsoumpas C, Sourbron S. Multimodal phantoms for clinical PET/MRI. EJNMMI Phys 2021;8:62. [PMID: 34436671 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-021-00408-0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Zarb F, Mcnulty J, Gatt A, Formosa C, Chockalingam N, Evanoff M, Rainford L. Comparison of in vivo vs. frozen vs. Thiel cadaver specimens in visualisation of anatomical structures of the ankle on proton density Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) through a visual grading analysis (VGA) study. Radiography 2017;23:117-24. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2016.12.004] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Gillmann C, Homolka N, Johnen W, Runz A, Echner G, Pfaffenberger A, Mann P, Schneider V, Hoffmann AL, Troost EGC, Koerber SA, Kotzerke J, Beuthien-Baumann B. Technical Note: ADAM PETer - An anthropomorphic, deformable and multimodality pelvis phantom with positron emission tomography extension for radiotherapy. Med Phys 2021;48:1624-32. [PMID: 33207020 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14597] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Song KH, Kim SY, Lee DW, Jung JY, Lee JH, Baek HM, Choe BY. Design of a fused phantom for quantitative evaluation of brain metabolites and enhanced quality assurance testing for magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. J Neurosci Methods 2015;255:75-84. [PMID: 26277420 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.08.005] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Portakal ZG, Shermer S, Jenkins C, Spezi E, Perrett T, Tuncel N, Phillips J. Design and characterization of tissue-mimicking gel phantoms for diffusion kurtosis imaging. Med Phys 2018;45:2476-85. [PMID: 29635795 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12907] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
15 Donahue PM, Crescenzi R, Scott AO, Braxton V, Desai A, Smith SA, Jordi J, Meszoely IM, Grau AM, Kauffmann RM, Sweeting RS, Spotanski K, Ridner SH, Donahue MJ. Bilateral Changes in Deep Tissue Environment After Manual Lymphatic Drainage in Patients with Breast Cancer Treatment-Related Lymphedema. Lymphat Res Biol 2017;15:45-56. [PMID: 28323572 DOI: 10.1089/lrb.2016.0020] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
16 Brynolfsson P, Axelsson J, Holmberg A, Jonsson JH, Goldhaber D, Jian Y, Illerstam F, Engström M, Zackrisson B, Nyholm T. Technical Note: Adapting a GE SIGNA PET/MR scanner for radiotherapy. Med Phys 2018;45:3546-50. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.13032] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
17 Kim MJ, Lee SR, Lee MY, Sohn JW, Yun HG, Choi JY, Jeon SW, Suh TS. Characterization of 3D printing techniques: Toward patient specific quality assurance spine-shaped phantom for stereotactic body radiation therapy. PLoS One 2017;12:e0176227. [PMID: 28472175 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176227] [Cited by in Crossref: 20] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
18 Adams F, Qiu T, Mark A, Fritz B, Kramer L, Schlager D, Wetterauer U, Miernik A, Fischer P. Soft 3D-Printed Phantom of the Human Kidney with Collecting System. Ann Biomed Eng 2017;45:963-72. [PMID: 27830490 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-016-1757-5] [Cited by in Crossref: 69] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 51] [Article Influence: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
19 So S, Park HW, Kim B, Fritz FJ, Poser BA, Roebroeck A, Bilgic B. BUDA-MESMERISE: Rapid acquisition and unsupervised parameter estimation for T1 , T2 , M0 , B0 , and B1 maps. Magn Reson Med 2022. [PMID: 35344611 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29228] [Reference Citation Analysis]
20 Weidner A, Stengl C, Dinkel F, Dorsch S, Murillo C, Seeber S, Gnirs R, Runz A, Echner G, Karger CP, Jäkel O. An abdominal phantom with anthropomorphic organ motion and multimodal imaging contrast for MR-guided radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2022;67. [PMID: 35081516 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac4ef8] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
21 Singhrao K, Fu J, Gao Y, Wu HH, Yang Y, Hu P, Lewis JH. A generalized system of tissue-mimicking materials for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Phys Med Biol 2020;65:13NT01. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab86d4] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
22 Niebuhr NI, Johnen W, Echner G, Runz A, Bach M, Stoll M, Giske K, Greilich S, Pfaffenberger A. The ADAM-pelvis phantom—an anthropomorphic, deformable and multimodal phantom for MRgRT. Phys Med Biol 2019;64:04NT05. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aafd5f] [Cited by in Crossref: 21] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20] [Article Influence: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
23 Nosrati R, Soliman A, Safigholi H, Hashemi M, Wronski M, Morton G, Pejović-milić A, Stanisz G, Song WY. MRI-based automated detection of implanted low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy seeds using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and unsupervised machine learning (ML). Radiotherapy and Oncology 2018;129:540-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.09.003] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13] [Article Influence: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
24 Niebuhr NI, Johnen W, Güldaglar T, Runz A, Echner G, Mann P, Möhler C, Pfaffenberger A, Jäkel O, Greilich S. Technical Note: Radiological properties of tissue surrogates used in a multimodality deformable pelvic phantom for MR-guided radiotherapy: Tissue surrogates for a multimodality phantom. Med Phys 2016;43:908-16. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4939874] [Cited by in Crossref: 31] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21] [Article Influence: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
25 Wereszczyńska B, Szcześniak K. MRI phantom for tissue simulation with respect to diffusion coefficient and kurtosis - Validation with injection of liposomal theranostics. Magn Reson Imaging 2021;82:18-23. [PMID: 34147600 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2021.06.006] [Reference Citation Analysis]
26 Neumann W, Lietzmann F, Schad LR, Zöllner FG. Design of a multimodal (1H/23Na MR/CT) anthropomorphic thorax phantom. Z Med Phys 2017;27:124-31. [PMID: 27596568 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2016.07.004] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
27 Singhrao K, Ruan D, Fu J, Gao Y, Chee G, Yang Y, King C, Hu P, Kishan AU, Lewis JH. Quantification of fiducial marker visibility for MRI-only prostate radiotherapy simulation. Phys Med Biol 2020;65:035015. [PMID: 31881546 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab65db] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
28 Steiner J, Matthews K 2nd, Jia G. Endorectal digital prostate tomosynthesis (endoDPT): a proof-of-concept study. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2021;7. [PMID: 34037539 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/abd59b] [Reference Citation Analysis]
29 Nosrati R, Paudel M, Ravi A, Pejovic-milic A, Morton G, Stanisz GJ. Potential applications of the quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) in MR-guided radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 2019;64:145013. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab2623] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
30 Menikou G, Yiannakou M, Yiallouras C, Ioannides C, Damianou C. MRI-compatible bone phantom for evaluating ultrasonic thermal exposures. Ultrasonics 2016;71:12-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2016.05.020] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
31 Singhrao K, Fu J, Wu HH, Hu P, Kishan AU, Chin RK, Lewis JH. A novel anthropomorphic multimodality phantom for MRI‐based radiotherapy quality assurance testing. Med Phys 2020;47:1443-51. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.14027] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
32 Bauer DF, Adlung A, Brumer I, Golla AK, Russ T, Oelschlegel E, Tollens F, Clausen S, Aumüller P, Schad LR, Nörenberg D, Zöllner FG. An anthropomorphic pelvis phantom for MR-guided prostate interventions. Magn Reson Med 2021. [PMID: 34652819 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29043] [Reference Citation Analysis]
33 Quick HH. Integrated PET/MR: Integrated PET/MR. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;39:243-58. [DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24523] [Cited by in Crossref: 87] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 76] [Article Influence: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
34 Bo Zhao, Haldar JP, Congyu Liao, Dan Ma, Yun Jiang, Griswold MA, Setsompop K, Wald LL. Optimal Experiment Design for Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting: Cramér-Rao Bound Meets Spin Dynamics. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2019;38:844-61. [PMID: 30295618 DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2018.2873704] [Cited by in Crossref: 33] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22] [Article Influence: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
35 Schneider S, Jølck RI, Troost EGC, Hoffmann AL. Quantification of MRI visibility and artifacts at 3T of liquid fiducial marker in a pancreas tissue-mimicking phantom. Med Phys 2018;45:37-47. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.12670] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]