BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Strong KA, Zusevics KL, Bick D, Veith R. Views of primary care providers regarding the return of genome sequencing incidental findings. Clin Genet 2014;86:461-8. [PMID: 24673592 DOI: 10.1111/cge.12390] [Cited by in Crossref: 24] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Duong B, Savarirayan R, Winship I. Incidental diagnosis of HLRCC following investigation for Asperger Syndrome: actionable and actioned. Familial Cancer 2016;15:25-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s10689-015-9829-5] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Shashi V, McConkie-Rosell A, Schoch K, Kasturi V, Rehder C, Jiang YH, Goldstein DB, McDonald MT. Practical considerations in the clinical application of whole-exome sequencing. Clin Genet 2016;89:173-81. [PMID: 25678066 DOI: 10.1111/cge.12569] [Cited by in Crossref: 42] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 32] [Article Influence: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Delanne J, Nambot S, Chassagne A, Putois O, Pelissier A, Peyron C, Gautier E, Thevenon J, Cretin E, Bruel AL, Goussot V, Ghiringhelli F, Boidot R, Tran Mau-Them F, Philippe C, Vitobello A, Demougeot L, Vernin C, Lapointe AS, Bardou M, Luu M, Binquet C, Lejeune C, Joly L, Juif C, Baurand A, Sawka C, Bertolone G, Duffourd Y, Sanlaville D, Pujol P, Geneviève D, Houdayer F, Thauvin-Robinet C, Faivre L. Secondary findings from whole-exome/genome sequencing evaluating stakeholder perspectives. A review of the literature. Eur J Med Genet 2019;62:103529. [PMID: 30165243 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.08.010] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18] [Article Influence: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Heaton TJ, Chico V. Attitudes towards the sharing of genetic information with at-risk relatives: results of a quantitative survey. Hum Genet 2016;135:109-20. [PMID: 26612611 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-015-1612-z] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Berg JS, Powell CM. Potential Uses and Inherent Challenges of Using Genome-Scale Sequencing to Augment Current Newborn Screening. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2015;5:a023150. [PMID: 26438605 DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a023150] [Cited by in Crossref: 15] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20] [Article Influence: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Jiang S, Anis AH, Cromwell I, Mohammadi T, Schrader KA, Lucas J, Armour CM, Clausen M, Bombard Y, Regier DA. Health-care practitioners' preferences for the return of secondary findings from next-generation sequencing: a discrete choice experiment. Genet Med 2020;22:2011-9. [PMID: 32820245 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-0927-x] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Anderson JA, Meyn MS, Shuman C, Zlotnik Shaul R, Mantella LE, Szego MJ, Bowdin S, Monfared N, Hayeems RZ. Parents perspectives on whole genome sequencing for their children: qualified enthusiasm? J Med Ethics 2017;43:535-9. [PMID: 27888232 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103564] [Cited by in Crossref: 35] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30] [Article Influence: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Ormond KE, O'daniel JM, Kalia SS. Secondary findings: How did we get here, and where are we going? J Genet Couns 2019;28:326-33. [DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1098] [Cited by in Crossref: 17] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Scheuner MT, Peredo J, Benkendorf J, Bowdish B, Feldman G, Fleisher L, Mulvihill JJ, Watson M, Herman GE, Evans J. Reporting genomic secondary findings: ACMG members weigh in. Genet Med 2015;17:27-35. [PMID: 25394173 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2014.165] [Cited by in Crossref: 41] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 34] [Article Influence: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Ngeow J, Eng C. Whole-genome sequencing: not yet making the clinical grade. Per Med 2014;11:471-5. [PMID: 29758773 DOI: 10.2217/pme.14.32] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Bishop C, Strong K, Dimmock D. Choices of incidental findings of individuals undergoing genome wide sequencing, a single center's experience: Choices of incidental findings of individuals undergoing genome wide sequencing. Clin Genet 2017;91:137-40. [DOI: 10.1111/cge.12829] [Cited by in Crossref: 19] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15] [Article Influence: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Ploug T, Holm S. Clinical genome sequencing and population preferences for information about 'incidental' findings-From medically actionable genes (MAGs) to patient actionable genes (PAGs). PLoS One 2017;12:e0179935. [PMID: 28671958 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179935] [Cited by in Crossref: 19] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17] [Article Influence: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Yamamoto K, Hachiya T, Fukushima A, Nakaya N, Okayama A, Tanno K, Aizawa F, Tokutomi T, Hozawa A, Shimizu A. Population-based biobank participants' preferences for receiving genetic test results. J Hum Genet 2017;62:1037-48. [PMID: 28794501 DOI: 10.1038/jhg.2017.81] [Cited by in Crossref: 14] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15] [Article Influence: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Spies G, Mokaya J, Steadman J, Schuitmaker N, Kidd M, Hemmings SMJ, Carr JA, Kuivaniemi H, Seedat S; SHARED ROOTS Group. Attitudes among South African university staff and students towards disclosing secondary genetic findings. J Community Genet 2021;12:171-84. [PMID: 33219499 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-020-00494-0] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
15 May T. On the justifiability of ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. J Law Med Ethics 2015;43:134-42. [PMID: 25846044 DOI: 10.1111/jlme.12201] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10] [Article Influence: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
16 Mackley MP, Fletcher B, Parker M, Watkins H, Ormondroyd E. Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Genet Med 2017;19:283-93. [PMID: 27584911 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2016.109] [Cited by in Crossref: 74] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 70] [Article Influence: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
17 Sayeed S, Califf R, Green R, Wong C, Mahaffey K, Gambhir SS, Mega J, Patrick-Lake B, Frazier K, Pignone M, Hernandez A, Shah SH, Fan AC, Krüg S, Shaack T, Shore S, Spielman S, Eckstrand J, Wong CA; Project Baseline Health Study Research Group. Return of individual research results: What do participants prefer and expect? PLoS One 2021;16:e0254153. [PMID: 34324495 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254153] [Reference Citation Analysis]
18 Middleton A, Morley KI, Bragin E, Firth HV, Hurles ME, Wright CF, Parker M; DDD study. Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research. Eur J Hum Genet 2016;24:21-9. [PMID: 25920556 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.58] [Cited by in Crossref: 116] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 107] [Article Influence: 16.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
19 Janssens ACJW, Evans JP. Returning pharmacogenetic secondary findings from genome sequencing: let’s not put the cart before the horse. Genet Med 2015;17:854-6. [DOI: 10.1038/gim.2015.59] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
20 Pillar N, Isakov O, Weissglas-Volkov D, Botchan S, Friedman E, Arber N, Shomron N. Actionable clinical decisions based on comprehensive genomic evaluation in asymptomatic adults. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2015;3:433-9. [PMID: 26436109 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.154] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
21 Ryan KA, De Vries RG, Uhlmann WR, Roberts JS, Gornick MC. Public's Views toward Return of Secondary Results in Genomic Sequencing: It's (Almost) All about the Choice. J Genet Couns 2017;26:1197-212. [PMID: 28357777 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0095-6] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
22 Joshi E, Mighton C, Clausen M, Casalino S, Kim THM, Kowal C, Birken C, Maguire JL, Bombard Y. Primary care provider perspectives on using genomic sequencing in the care of healthy children. Eur J Hum Genet 2020;28:551-7. [PMID: 31804631 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-019-0547-6] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]