BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Gliwa C, Berkman BE. Do researchers have an obligation to actively look for genetic incidental findings? Am J Bioeth 2013;13:32-42. [PMID: 23391059 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2012.754062] [Cited by in Crossref: 66] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 60] [Article Influence: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Garrett JR. Reframing the ethical debate regarding incidental findings in genetic research. Am J Bioeth 2013;13:44-6. [PMID: 23391061 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2013.757972] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Ackerman SL, Koenig BA. Understanding variations in secondary findings reporting practices across U.S. genome sequencing laboratories. AJOB Empirical Bioethics 2017;9:48-57. [DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2017.1405095] [Cited by in Crossref: 16] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Lucassen A, Houlston RS. The challenges of genome analysis in the health care setting. Genes (Basel) 2014;5:576-85. [PMID: 25055201 DOI: 10.3390/genes5030576] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Berkman BE, Hull SC, Eckstein L. The unintended implications of blurring the line between research and clinical care in a genomic age. Per Med 2014;11:285-95. [PMID: 25506378 DOI: 10.2217/pme.14.3] [Cited by in Crossref: 26] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23] [Article Influence: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Zusevics K. Ancillary Care, Genomics, and the Need and Opportunity for Community-Based Participatory Research. The American Journal of Bioethics 2013;13:54-6. [DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2012.754065] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Doernberg S, Hull SC. Harms of Deception in FMR1 Premutation Genotype-Driven Recruitment. Am J Bioeth 2017;17:62-3. [PMID: 28328354 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1284920] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Rahimzadeh V, Avard D, Sénécal K, Knoppers BM, Sinnett D. To disclose, or not to disclose? Context matters. Eur J Hum Genet 2015;23:279-84. [PMID: 24916647 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.108] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Appelbaum PS, Parens E, Waldman CR, Klitzman R, Fyer A, Martinez J, Price WN 2nd, Chung WK. Models of consent to return of incidental findings in genomic research. Hastings Cent Rep 2014;44:22-32. [PMID: 24919982 DOI: 10.1002/hast.328] [Cited by in Crossref: 51] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 44] [Article Influence: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Schaefer GO, Savulescu J. The Right to Know: A Revised Standard for Reporting Incidental Findings. Hastings Cent Rep 2018;48:22-32. [PMID: 29590521 DOI: 10.1002/hast.836] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Eckstein L, Garrett JR, Berkman BE. A framework for analyzing the ethics of disclosing genetic research findings. J Law Med Ethics 2014;42:190-207. [PMID: 25040383 DOI: 10.1111/jlme.12135] [Cited by in Crossref: 20] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21] [Article Influence: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Vos S, van Delden JJM, van Diest PJ, Bredenoord AL. Moral Duties of Genomics Researchers: Why Personalized Medicine Requires a Collective Approach. Trends Genet 2017;33:118-28. [PMID: 28017398 DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2016.11.006] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Dal-Ré R, Katsanis N, Katsanis S, Parker LS, Ayuso C. Managing incidental genomic findings in clinical trials: fulfillment of the principle of justice. PLoS Med 2014;11:e1001584. [PMID: 24453945 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001584] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10] [Article Influence: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Black L, Avard D, Zawati MH, Knoppers BM, Hébert J, Sauvageau G; Leucegene Project. Funding considerations for the disclosure of genetic incidental findings in biobank research. Clin Genet 2013;84:397-406. [PMID: 23662709 DOI: 10.1111/cge.12190] [Cited by in Crossref: 17] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Botkin JR, Belmont JW, Berg JS, Berkman BE, Bombard Y, Holm IA, Levy HP, Ormond KE, Saal HM, Spinner NB, Wilfond BS, McInerney JD. Points to Consider: Ethical, Legal, and Psychosocial Implications of Genetic Testing in Children and Adolescents. Am J Hum Genet 2015;97:6-21. [PMID: 26140447 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.05.022] [Cited by in Crossref: 255] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 196] [Article Influence: 36.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
15 Wright CF, Fitzgerald TW, Jones WD, Clayton S, McRae JF, van Kogelenberg M, King DA, Ambridge K, Barrett DM, Bayzetinova T, Bevan AP, Bragin E, Chatzimichali EA, Gribble S, Jones P, Krishnappa N, Mason LE, Miller R, Morley KI, Parthiban V, Prigmore E, Rajan D, Sifrim A, Swaminathan GJ, Tivey AR, Middleton A, Parker M, Carter NP, Barrett JC, Hurles ME, FitzPatrick DR, Firth HV; DDD study. Genetic diagnosis of developmental disorders in the DDD study: a scalable analysis of genome-wide research data. Lancet 2015;385:1305-14. [PMID: 25529582 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61705-0] [Cited by in Crossref: 422] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 232] [Article Influence: 52.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
16 Scherr CL, Aufox S, Ross AA, Ramesh S, Wicklund CA, Smith M. What People Want to Know About Their Genes: A Critical Review of the Literature on Large-Scale Genome Sequencing Studies. Healthcare (Basel) 2018;6:E96. [PMID: 30096823 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare6030096] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
17 Murphy Bollinger J, Bridges JF, Mohamed A, Kaufman D. Public preferences for the return of research results in genetic research: a conjoint analysis. Genet Med 2014;16:932-9. [PMID: 24854226 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2014.50] [Cited by in Crossref: 32] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 31] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
18 Fernandez CV, Bouffet E, Malkin D, Jabado N, O'Connell C, Avard D, Knoppers BM, Ferguson M, Boycott KM, Sorensen PH, Orr AC, Robitaille JM, McMaster CR. Attitudes of parents toward the return of targeted and incidental genomic research findings in children. Genet Med 2014;16:633-40. [PMID: 24434691 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.201] [Cited by in Crossref: 57] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 59] [Article Influence: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
19 Biesecker LG. Incidental variants are critical for genomics. Am J Hum Genet 2013;92:648-51. [PMID: 23643378 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.04.001] [Cited by in Crossref: 32] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 27] [Article Influence: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
20 Ross KM, Reiff M. A perspective from clinical providers and patients: researchers' duty to actively look for genetic incidental findings. Am J Bioeth 2013;13:56-8. [PMID: 23391067 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2012.754064] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
21 Boardman F, Hale R. Responsibility, identity, and genomic sequencing: A comparison of published recommendations and patient perspectives on accepting or declining incidental findings. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2018;6:1079-96. [PMID: 30370638 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.485] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
22 Haga SB, Zhao JQ. Stakeholder views on returning research results. Adv Genet 2013;84:41-81. [PMID: 24262096 DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-407703-4.00002-5] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
23 Pinxten W, Howard HC. Ethical issues raised by whole genome sequencing. Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology 2014;28:269-79. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2014.02.004] [Cited by in Crossref: 38] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 32] [Article Influence: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
24 Winkler EC, Wiemann S. Findings made in gene panel to whole genome sequencing: data, knowledge, ethics – and consequences? Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics 2016;16:1259-70. [DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2016.1212662] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
25 Shahmirzadi L, Chao EC, Palmaer E, Parra MC, Tang S, Gonzalez KD. Patient decisions for disclosure of secondary findings among the first 200 individuals undergoing clinical diagnostic exome sequencing. Genet Med 2014;16:395-9. [PMID: 24113345 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.153] [Cited by in Crossref: 75] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 71] [Article Influence: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
26 Wright CF, FitzPatrick DR, Firth HV. Paediatric genomics: diagnosing rare disease in children. Nat Rev Genet 2018;19:253-68. [PMID: 29398702 DOI: 10.1038/nrg.2017.116] [Cited by in Crossref: 172] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 134] [Article Influence: 43.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
27 Sundby A, Boolsen MW, Burgdorf KS, Ullum H, Hansen TF, Middleton A, Mors O. Stakeholders in psychiatry and their attitudes toward receiving pertinent and incident findings in genomic research. Am J Med Genet A 2017;173:2649-58. [PMID: 28817238 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38380] [Cited by in Crossref: 16] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15] [Article Influence: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
28 Ormondroyd E, Mackley MP, Blair E, Craft J, Knight JC, Taylor JC, Taylor J, Watkins H. "Not pathogenic until proven otherwise": perspectives of UK clinical genomics professionals toward secondary findings in context of a Genomic Medicine Multidisciplinary Team and the 100,000 Genomes Project. Genet Med 2018;20:320-8. [PMID: 29261176 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.157] [Cited by in Crossref: 33] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30] [Article Influence: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
29 Wouters RHP, Bijlsma RM, Frederix GWJ, Ausems MGEM, van Delden JJM, Voest EE, Bredenoord AL. Is It Our Duty To Hunt for Pathogenic Mutations? Trends Mol Med 2018;24:3-6. [PMID: 29246758 DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2017.11.008] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
30 Biesecker LG. The Nirvana fallacy and the return of results. Am J Bioeth 2013;13:43-4. [PMID: 23391060 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2013.755826] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
31 Appelbaum PS, Fyer A, Klitzman RL, Martinez J, Parens E, Zhang Y, Chung WK. Researchers' views on informed consent for return of secondary results in genomic research. Genet Med 2015;17:644-50. [PMID: 25503499 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2014.163] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
32 Hull SC, Berkman BE. Grappling with genomic incidental findings in the clinical realm. Chest 2014;145:226-30. [PMID: 24493507 DOI: 10.1378/chest.13-1976] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
33 Kostick K, Pereira S, Brannan C, Torgerson L, Lázaro-Muñoz G. Psychiatric genomics researchers' perspectives on best practices for returning results to individual participants. Genet Med 2020;22:345-52. [PMID: 31477844 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0642-7] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
34 Price WN 2nd. Legal implications of an ethical duty to search for genetic incidental findings. Am J Bioeth 2013;13:48-9. [PMID: 23391063 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2012.754068] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
35 Costain G, Bassett AS. Incomplete knowledge of the clinical context as a barrier to interpreting incidental genetic research findings. Am J Bioeth 2013;13:58-60. [PMID: 23391068 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2012.754063] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
36 Roche MI, Berg JS. Incidental Findings with Genomic Testing: Implications for Genetic Counseling Practice. Curr Genet Med Rep 2015;3:166-76. [PMID: 26566463 DOI: 10.1007/s40142-015-0075-9] [Cited by in Crossref: 57] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 48] [Article Influence: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
37 Pinard A, Miltgen M, Blanchard A, Mathieu H, Desvignes JP, Salgado D, Fabre A, Arnaud P, Barré L, Krahn M, Grandval P, Olschwang S, Zaffran S, Boileau C, Béroud C, Collod-Béroud G. Actionable Genes, Core Databases, and Locus-Specific Databases. Hum Mutat 2016;37:1299-307. [PMID: 27600092 DOI: 10.1002/humu.23112] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
38 Kleiderman E, Avard D, Besso A, Ali-Khan S, Sauvageau G, Hébert J. Disclosure of incidental findings in cancer genomic research: investigators' perceptions on obligations and barriers. Clin Genet 2015;88:320-6. [PMID: 25492269 DOI: 10.1111/cge.12540] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
39 Ulrich M. The duty to rescue in genomic research. Am J Bioeth 2013;13:50-1. [PMID: 23391064 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2012.754067] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10] [Article Influence: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
40 Hofmann B. Incidental findings of uncertain significance: To know or not to know--that is not the question. BMC Med Ethics 2016;17:13. [PMID: 26873084 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-016-0096-2] [Cited by in Crossref: 21] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19] [Article Influence: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
41 Jelsig AM, Qvist N, Brusgaard K, Ousager LB. Research participants in NGS studies want to know about incidental findings. Eur J Hum Genet 2015;23:1423-6. [PMID: 25604854 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.298] [Cited by in Crossref: 22] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22] [Article Influence: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
42 Gainotti S, Mascalzoni D, Bros-Facer V, Petrini C, Floridia G, Roos M, Salvatore M, Taruscio D. Meeting Patients' Right to the Correct Diagnosis: Ongoing International Initiatives on Undiagnosed Rare Diseases and Ethical and Social Issues. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018;15:E2072. [PMID: 30248891 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15102072] [Cited by in Crossref: 21] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13] [Article Influence: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
43 Anastasova V, Blasimme A, Julia S, Cambon-Thomsen A. Genomic incidental findings: reducing the burden to be fair. Am J Bioeth 2013;13:52-4. [PMID: 23391065 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2012.754066] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
44 Blasimme A, Vayena E. Becoming partners, retaining autonomy: ethical considerations on the development of precision medicine. BMC Med Ethics 2016;17:67. [PMID: 27809825 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-016-0149-6] [Cited by in Crossref: 27] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22] [Article Influence: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
45 Love-Nichols J, Uhlmann WR, Arscott P, Willer C, Hornsby W, Roberts JS. A survey of aortic disease biorepository participants' preferences for return of research genetic results. J Genet Couns 2021;30:645-55. [PMID: 33319384 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1341] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
46 Koplin JJ, Savulescu J, Vears DF. Why genomics researchers are sometimes morally required to hunt for secondary findings. BMC Med Ethics 2020;21:11. [PMID: 32005225 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-020-0449-8] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
47 Parens E, Appelbaum P, Chung W. Incidental findings in the era of whole genome sequencing? Hastings Cent Rep 2013;43:16-9. [PMID: 23842918 DOI: 10.1002/hast.189] [Cited by in Crossref: 23] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15] [Article Influence: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
48 Klitzman R, Buquez B, Appelbaum PS, Fyer A, Chung WK. Processes and factors involved in decisions regarding return of incidental genomic findings in research. Genet Med 2014;16:311-7. [PMID: 24071801 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.140] [Cited by in Crossref: 26] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20] [Article Influence: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
49 Haga SB, Friedman B, Richard G. Considering the Benefits and Risks of Research Participants' Access to Sequence Data. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2017;21:717-21. [PMID: 29045186 DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2017.0143] [Reference Citation Analysis]
50 Wright CF, Middleton A, Barrett JC, Firth HV, FitzPatrick DR, Hurles ME, Parker M. Returning genome sequences to research participants: Policy and practice. Wellcome Open Res 2017;2:15. [PMID: 28317033 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.10942.1] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10] [Article Influence: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
51 Borgelt E, Anderson JA, Illes J. Managing incidental findings: lessons from neuroimaging. Am J Bioeth 2013;13:46-7. [PMID: 23391062 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2012.754069] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
52 Nguyen A, Hook CC, Dearani JA, Schaff HV. Mycobacterium chimaera: The ethical duty to disclose the minimal risk of infection to exposed patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017;153:1422-1424.e1. [PMID: 28351477 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.02.020] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
53 Holm IA, Yu TW, Joffe S. From Sequence Data to Returnable Results: Ethical Issues in Variant Calling and Interpretation. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2017;21:178-83. [PMID: 28306396 DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2016.0413] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
54 Punetha J, Hoffman EP. Short read (next-generation) sequencing: a tutorial with cardiomyopathy diagnostics as an exemplar. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2013;6:427-34. [PMID: 23852418 DOI: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.113.000085] [Cited by in Crossref: 17] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10] [Article Influence: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
55 Schuol S, Schickhardt C, Wiemann S, Bartram CR, Tanner K, Eils R, Meder B, Richter D, Glimm H, von Kalle C, Winkler EC. So rare we need to hunt for them: reframing the ethical debate on incidental findings. Genome Med 2015;7:83. [PMID: 26229554 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-015-0198-3] [Cited by in Crossref: 16] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
56 Middleton A, Morley KI, Bragin E, Firth HV, Hurles ME, Wright CF, Parker M; DDD study. Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research. Eur J Hum Genet 2016;24:21-9. [PMID: 25920556 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.58] [Cited by in Crossref: 116] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 107] [Article Influence: 16.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
57 Lynch J, Hines J, Theodore S, Mitchell M. Lay Attitudes Toward Trust, Uncertainty, and the Return of Pediatric Research Results in Biobanking. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2016;7:160-6. [PMID: 28050575 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2015.1053008] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
58 Shkedi-Rafid S, Dheensa S, Crawford G, Fenwick A, Lucassen A. Defining and managing incidental findings in genetic and genomic practice. J Med Genet 2014;51:715-23. [PMID: 25228303 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2014-102435] [Cited by in Crossref: 41] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 35] [Article Influence: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
59 Gliwa C, Berkman BE. Response to open peer commentaries on "do researchers have an obligation to actively look for genetic incidental findings?". Am J Bioeth 2013;13:W10-1. [PMID: 23557061 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2013.781470] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
60 Prows CA, Tran G, Blosser B. Whole exome or genome sequencing: nurses need to prepare families for the possibilities. J Adv Nurs 2014;70:2736-45. [DOI: 10.1111/jan.12516] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
61 Souzeau E, Burdon KP, Mackey DA, Hewitt AW, Savarirayan R, Otlowski M, Craig JE. Ethical Considerations for the Return of Incidental Findings in Ophthalmic Genomic Research. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2016;5:3. [PMID: 26929883 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.5.1.3] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]