BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Bigonnesse C, Mahmood A, Chaudhury H, Mortenson WB, Miller WC, Martin Ginis KA. The role of neighborhood physical environment on mobility and social participation among people using mobility assistive technology. Disability & Society 2018;33:866-93. [DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2018.1453783] [Cited by in Crossref: 15] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Lakhani A, Parekh S, Watling DP, Grimbeek P, Duncan R, Charlifue S, Kendall E. Access and engagement with places in the community, and the quality of life among people with spinal cord damage. J Spinal Cord Med 2021;:1-9. [PMID: 33465016 DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2020.1860867] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Fallon KF, Price CR. Meeting the needs of low-income housing for senior and disabled populations: an analysis of low-income housing tax credit residents in Ohio. Housing and Society 2020;47:244-68. [DOI: 10.1080/08882746.2020.1783940] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Xie Q, Yuan X. Functioning and environment: Exploring outdoor activity-friendly environments for older adults with disabilities in a Chinese long-term care facility. Building Research & Information. [DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2021.1968292] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Pettersson C, Zingmark M, Haak M. Enabling social participation for older people: The content of reablement by age, gender, and level of functioning in occupational therapists' interventions. Scand J Occup Ther 2021;:1-8. [PMID: 34463598 DOI: 10.1080/11038128.2021.1967442] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Battalova A, Hurd L, Hobson S, Kirby RL, Emery R, Mortenson WB. “Dirty looks”: A critical phenomenology of motorized mobility scooter use. Social Science & Medicine 2022;297:114810. [DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114810] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Smith EM, Huff S, Wescott H, Daniel R, Ebuenyi ID, O'Donnell J, Maalim M, Zhang W, Khasnabis C, MacLachlan M. Assistive technologies are central to the realization of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2022;:1-6. [PMID: 35900971 DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2099987] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Mahmood A, O’dea E, Bigonnesse C, Labbe D, Mahal T, Qureshi M, Mortenson WB. Stakeholders Walkability/Wheelability Audit in Neighbourhoods (SWAN): user-led audit and photographic documentation in Canada. Disability & Society 2020;35:902-25. [DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2019.1649127] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Finlay JM, Rowles GD. Clinical geography: A proposal to embrace space, place and wellbeing through person-centered practice. Wellbeing, Space and Society 2021;2:100035. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wss.2021.100035] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Bozovic T, Hinckson E, Smith M. Why do people walk? role of the built environment and state of development of a social model of walkability. Travel Behaviour and Society 2020;20:181-91. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tbs.2020.03.010] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Hansen RK, Larsen RG, Laessoe U, Samani A, Cowan RE. Physical Activity Barriers in Danish Manual Wheelchair Users: A Cross-sectional Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2021;102:687-93. [PMID: 33091383 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.09.384] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Bozovic T, Stewart T, Hinckson E, Smith M. Clearing the path to transcend barriers to walking: Analysis of associations between perceptions and walking behaviour. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 2021;77:197-208. [DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2021.01.003] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Uchenwoke CI, Arinze BO, Nwankwo MJ, Umunnah JO. Quality of life, self-esteem, self-efficacy and social participation of persons living with mobility-related disability using mobility aids devices within select Nigerian communities. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2021;:1-6. [PMID: 33555947 DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2021.1881173] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Lee D, Tak SH. Barriers and facilitators of older adults’ usage of mobility devices: a scoping review. Educational Gerontology. [DOI: 10.1080/03601277.2022.2084309] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Pettersson C, Baudin K, Hedvall PO. The struggle for access - a qualitative document study of how people using wheeled mobility devices experience exclusion and discrimination. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2022;:1-9. [PMID: 35930498 DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2107094] [Reference Citation Analysis]
15 Atoyebi OA, Labbé D, Prescott M, Mahmood A, Routhier F, Miller WC, Mortenson WB. Mobility Challenges Among Older Adult Mobility Device Users. Curr Geri Rep 2019;8:223-31. [DOI: 10.1007/s13670-019-00295-5] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]