BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Strickland JC, Stoops WW. Utilizing content-knowledge questionnaires to assess study eligibility and detect deceptive responding. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2020;46:149-57. [PMID: 31810399 DOI: 10.1080/00952990.2019.1689990] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Smith KE, Rogers JM, Dunn KE, Grundmann O, McCurdy CR, Schriefer D, Epstein DH. Searching for a Signal: Self-Reported Kratom Dose-Effect Relationships Among a Sample of US Adults With Regular Kratom Use Histories. Front Pharmacol 2022;13:765917. [PMID: 35300296 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.765917] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Scheibein F, Donnelly W, Wells JS. Assessing open science and citizen science in addictions and substance use research: A scoping review. Int J Drug Policy 2021;100:103505. [PMID: 34753045 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103505] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Pickering D, Blaszczynski A. Paid online convenience samples in gambling studies: questionable data quality. International Gambling Studies 2021;21:516-36. [DOI: 10.1080/14459795.2021.1884735] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Pautassi RM, Pilatti A. Tackling deceptive responding during eligibility via content-knowledge questionnaires. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2020;46:141-2. [PMID: 31961760 DOI: 10.1080/00952990.2020.1712723] [Reference Citation Analysis]