BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Hollin IL, Craig BM, Coast J, Beusterien K, Vass C, Disantostefano R, Peay H. Reporting Formative Qualitative Research to Support the Development of Quantitative Preference Study Protocols and Corresponding Survey Instruments: Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers. Patient 2020;13:121-36. [DOI: 10.1007/s40271-019-00401-x] [Cited by in Crossref: 62] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 67] [Article Influence: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Meadows KA, Reaney M. Bringing the patient's perspectives forward in drug development and health-care evaluation. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2023;:1-5. [PMID: 36620921 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2166492] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 dosReis S, Bozzi LM, Butler B, Xie RZ, Chapman RH, Bright J, Malik E, Slejko JF. Preferences for Treatments for Major Depressive Disorder: Formative Qualitative Research Using the Patient Experience. Patient 2023;16:57-66. [PMID: 36121615 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-022-00596-6] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Roth EG, Kim J, Slejko JF, Mullins CD, Doyle JL, Levitt DL, Melendez M, Fletke KJ, Hu Y. Constructing Health State Descriptions for Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer: Stakeholder Engagement and Formative Qualitative Research. Patient 2023;16:67-76. [PMID: 36169919 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-022-00597-5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Lorimer K, Greco G, Lorgelly P. A new sexual wellbeing paradigm grounded in capability approach concepts of human flourishing and social justice. Cult Health Sex 2022;:1-16. [PMID: 36565149 DOI: 10.1080/13691058.2022.2158236] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Arije O, Madan J, Hlungwani T. Attributes development for a discrete choice experiment on preferences in sexual and reproductive health services for adolescents and young people in Nigeria. BMC Health Serv Res 2022;22:1511. [PMID: 36510202 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08888-1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Loria-Rebolledo LE, Watson V, Hassan S, Gabbay M, Tahir N, Hossain M, Goodall M, Frith L. Public contributors' preferences for the organization of remote public involvement meetings in health and social care: A discrete choice experiment study. Health Expect 2023;26:146-59. [PMID: 36335575 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13641] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Smith IP, Ancillotti M, de Bekker-Grob EW, Veldwijk J. Does It Matter How You Ask? Assessing the Impact of Failure or Effectiveness Framing on Preferences for Antibiotic Treatments in a Discrete Choice Experiment. Patient Prefer Adherence 2022;16:2921-36. [PMID: 36324822 DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S365624] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Schoefs E, Vermeire S, Ferrante M, Sabino J, Lambrechts T, Avedano L, Haaf I, De Rocchis MS, Broggi A, Sajak-Szczerba M, Saldaña R, Janssens R, Huys I. What are the unmet needs and most relevant treatment outcomes according to patients with inflammatory bowel disease? A qualitative patient preference study. J Crohns Colitis 2022:jjac145. [PMID: 36165579 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac145] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Currie GR, Pham T, Twilt M, Ijzerman MJ, Hull PM, Kip MMA, Benseler SM, Hazlewood GS, Yeung RSM, Wulffraat NM, Swart JF, Vastert SJ, Marshall DA. Perspectives of Pediatric Rheumatologists on Initiating and Tapering Biologics in Patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Formative Qualitative Study. Patient 2022;15:599-609. [DOI: 10.1007/s40271-022-00575-x] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Arije O, Hlungwani T, Madan J. “They will judge you more like a parent instead of like a health practitioner”: Perceptions and preferences of young people regarding sexual and reproductive health services in Southwest Nigeria. Dialogues in Health 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.dialog.2022.100051] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Barthold D, Brah AT, Graham SM, Simoni JM, Hauber B. Improvements to Survey Design from Pilot Testing a Discrete-Choice Experiment of the Preferences of Persons Living with HIV for Long-Acting Antiretroviral Therapies. Patient 2022;15:513-520. [DOI: 10.1007/s40271-022-00581-z] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Mehrotra S, Gonzalez JM, Schantz K, Yang JC, Friedewald JJ, Knight R. Patient Preferences for Waiting Time and Kidney Quality. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2022;17:1363-71. [PMID: 35985699 DOI: 10.2215/CJN.01480222] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Zeidan AM, Tsai J, Karimi M, Schmier J, Jayade S, Zormpas E, Hassan A, Ruiters D, Anthony C, Hill K, Wert T, Botteman M. Patient Preferences for Benefits, Risks, and Administration Route of Hypomethylating Agents in Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia 2022;22:e853-e866. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2022.04.023] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Kennedy BL, Currie GR, Kania-richmond A, Emery CA, Mackean G, Marshall DA. Factors That Patients Consider in Their Choice of Non-Surgical Management for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: Formative Qualitative Research for a Discrete Choice Experiment. Patient 2022;15:537-550. [DOI: 10.1007/s40271-022-00577-9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
15 Hollin IL, Paskett J, Schuster ALR, Crossnohere NL, Bridges JFP. Best-Worst Scaling and the Prioritization of Objects in Health: A Systematic Review. Pharmacoeconomics 2022. [PMID: 35838889 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01167-1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
16 Mohr W, Rädke A, Afi A, Mühlichen F, Platen M, Scharf A, Michalowsky B, Hoffmann W. Development of a Quantitative Preference Instrument for Person-Centered Dementia Care—Stage 2: Insights from a Formative Qualitative Study to Design and Pretest a Dementia-Friendly Analytic Hierarchy Process Survey. IJERPH 2022;19:8554. [DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19148554] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
17 Mohr W, Rädke A, Michalowsky B, Hoffmann W. Elicitation of quantitative, choice-based preferences for Person-Centered Care among People living with Dementia in comparison to physicians' judgements in Germany: study protocol for the mixed-methods PreDemCare-study. BMC Geriatr 2022;22:567. [PMID: 35804302 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03238-6] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
18 Bentley C, Izadi-najafabadi S, Raymakers A, Mctaggart-cowan H. Qualitative Research Informing a Preference Study on Selecting Cannabis for Cancer Survivor Symptom Management: Design of a Discrete Choice Experiment. Patient 2022;15:497-507. [DOI: 10.1007/s40271-021-00567-3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
19 Mohr W, Rädke A, Afi A, Mühlichen F, Platen M, Michalowsky B, Hoffmann W. Development of a Quantitative Instrument to Elicit Patient Preferences for Person-Centered Dementia Care Stage 1: A Formative Qualitative Study to Identify Patient Relevant Criteria for Experimental Design of an Analytic Hierarchy Process. IJERPH 2022;19:7629. [DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19137629] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
20 Mott DJ, Ternent L, Vale L. Do preferences differ based on respondent experience of a health issue and its treatment? A case study using a public health intervention. Eur J Health Econ 2022. [PMID: 35716317 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-022-01482-6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
21 Kechichian A, Desmeules F, Girard P, Pinsault N. Acceptability of a task sharing and shifting model between family physicians and physiotherapists in French multidisciplinary primary healthcare centres: a cross-sectional survey. Fam Med Community Health 2022;10. [PMID: 35710147 DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2022-001644] [Reference Citation Analysis]
22 Rivero-Arias O, Buckell J, Allin B, Craig BM, Ayman G, Knight M; CSOR Collaborative Group. Using stated-preferences methods to develop a summary metric to determine successful treatment of children with a surgical condition: a study protocol. BMJ Open 2022;12:e062833. [PMID: 35680263 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062833] [Reference Citation Analysis]
23 Bailey C, Howell M, Raghunandan R, Salisbury A, Chen G, Coast J, Craig JC, Devlin NJ, Huynh E, Lancsar E, Mulhern BJ, Norman R, Petrou S, Ratcliffe J, Street DJ, Howard K, Viney R; Quality of Life in Kids: Key Evidence to Strengthen Decisions in Australia (QUOKKA), Tools for Outcomes Research to Measure, Value Child Health (TORCH) Project Teams. Preference Elicitation Techniques Used in Valuing Children's Health-Related Quality-of-Life: A Systematic Review. Pharmacoeconomics 2022. [PMID: 35619044 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01149-3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
24 Powell PA, Rowen D. What Matters for Evaluating the Quality of Mental Healthcare? Identifying Important Aspects in Qualitative Focus Groups with Service Users and Frontline Mental Health Professionals. Patient 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40271-022-00580-0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
25 Flythe JE, Forfang D, Gedney N, White DM, Wilkie C, Cavanaugh KL, Harris RC, Unruh M, Squillaci G, West M, Mansfield C, Soloe CS, Treiman K, Wood D, Hurst FP, Neuland CY, Saha A, Sheldon M, Tarver ME. Development of a Patient Preference Survey for Wearable Kidney Replacement Therapy Devices. Kidney360 2022;3:1197-209. [PMID: 35919522 DOI: 10.34067/KID.0001862022] [Reference Citation Analysis]
26 Mouter N, Boxebeld S, Kessels R, van Wijhe M, de Wit A, Lambooij M, van Exel J. Public Preferences for Policies to Promote COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake: A Discrete Choice Experiment in The Netherlands. Value in Health 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.03.013] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
27 Beaudart C, Silverman S, Gold DT, Williams SA, Weiss R, Hiligsmann M. A Qualitative Study to Assess US Patient Preferences between new Transdermal System and Injectable Anabolic Therapies for Osteoporosis Treatment. Arch Osteoporos 2022;17:57. [PMID: 35378644 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-022-01075-z] [Reference Citation Analysis]
28 Bailey PK, Hole BD, Plumb LA, Caskey FJ. Mixed-methods research in nephrology. Kidney International 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2022.01.027] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
29 Perrotta C, Romero M, Sguassero Y, Straw C, Gialdini C, Righetti N, Betran AP, Ramos S. Caesarean birth in public maternities in Argentina: a formative research study on the views of obstetricians, midwives and trainees. BMJ Open 2022;12:e053419. [PMID: 35078842 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053419] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
30 Gc VS, Iglesias CP, Erdem S, Hassan L, Peek N, Manca A. Using discrete-choice experiments to elicit preferences for digital wearable health technology for self-management of chronic kidney disease. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2022;38:e77. [DOI: 10.1017/s0266462322003233] [Reference Citation Analysis]
31 Martelletti P. Treatment. Migraine in Medicine 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-97359-9_4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
32 Marsh K, Ho K, Lo R, Zaour N, George AT, Cook NS. Assessing Patient Preferences in Rare Diseases: Direct Preference Elicitation in the Rare Chronic Kidney Disease, Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy. Patient 2021;14:837-847. [DOI: 10.1007/s40271-021-00521-3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
33 Hall R, Medina-Lara A, Hamilton W, Spencer AE. Attributes Used for Cancer Screening Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review. Patient 2021. [PMID: 34671946 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-021-00559-3] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
34 Smith HS, Morain SR, Robinson JO, Canfield I, Malek J, Rubanovich CK, Bloss CS, Ackerman SL, Biesecker B, Brothers KB, Goytia CN, Horowitz CR, Knight SJ, Koenig B, Kraft SA, Outram S, Rini C, Shipman KJ, Waltz M, Wilfond B, McGuire AL. Perceived Utility of Genomic Sequencing: Qualitative Analysis and Synthesis of a Conceptual Model to Inform Patient-Centered Instrument Development. Patient 2021. [PMID: 34658003 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-021-00558-4] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
35 Aguiar M, Laba TL, Munro S, Burch T, Beckett J, Kaal KJ, Bansback N, Hudson M, Harrison M. Co-production of randomized clinical trials with patients: a case study in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant for patients with scleroderma. Trials 2021;22:611. [PMID: 34503552 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05575-0] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
36 He J, Duenas A, Collacott H, Lam A, Gries KS, Carson R, Potthoff D, Trevor N, Tervonen T. Patient Perceptions Regarding Multiple Myeloma and Its Treatment: Qualitative Evidence from Interviews with Patients in the United Kingdom, France, and Germany. Patient 2021;14:613-23. [PMID: 33686594 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-021-00501-7] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
37 Apantaku G, Aguiar M, Kaal KJ, McDonald PJ, Connolly MB, Hrincu V, Illes J, Harrison M. Understanding Attributes that Influence Physician and Caregiver Decisions About Neurotechnology for Pediatric Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Formative Qualitative Study to Support the Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment. Patient 2021. [PMID: 34431073 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-021-00544-w] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
38 Willems D, Hiligsmann M, van der Zee HH, Sayed CJ, Evers SMAA. Identifying Unmet Care Needs and Important Treatment Attributes in the Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Qualitative Interview Study. Patient 2021. [PMID: 34368925 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-021-00539-7] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
39 Viberg Johansson J, Shah N, Haraldsdóttir E, Bentzen HB, Coy S, Kaye J, Mascalzoni D, Veldwijk J. Governance mechanisms for sharing of health data: An approach towards selecting attributes for complex discrete choice experiment studies. Technology in Society 2021;66:101625. [DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101625] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
40 Artioli G, Sarli L. The qualitative method for a humanisation of research. Acta Biomed 2021;92:e2021041. [PMID: 34328126 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v92iS2.12042] [Reference Citation Analysis]
41 Webb EJD, Meads D, Eskytė I, Ford HL, Bekker HL, Chataway J, Pepper G, Marti J, Okan Y, Pavitt SH, Schmierer K, Manzano A. The Impact of Reproductive Issues on Preferences of Women with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis for Disease-Modifying Treatments. Patient 2020;13:583-97. [PMID: 32588337 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00429-4] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
42 Sugitani Y, Sugitani N, Ono S. Quantitative Preferences for Lung Cancer Treatment from the Patients' Perspective: A Systematic Review. Patient 2020;13:521-36. [PMID: 32686052 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00434-7] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
43 Janssens R, Lang T, Vallejo A, Galinsky J, Plate A, Morgan K, Cabezudo E, Silvennoinen R, Coriu D, Badelita S, Irimia R, Anttonen M, Manninen RL, Schoefs E, Vandebroek M, Vanhellemont A, Delforge M, Stevens H, Simoens S, Huys I. Patient Preferences for Multiple Myeloma Treatments: A Multinational Qualitative Study. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021;8:686165. [PMID: 34295912 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.686165] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
44 Carter SM, Shih P, Williams J, Degeling C, Mooney-Somers J. Conducting Qualitative Research Online: Challenges and Solutions. Patient 2021. [PMID: 34114170 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-021-00528-w] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
45 Perrotta C, Romero M, Sguassero Y, Straw C, Gialdini C, Righetti N, Beltrán AP, Ramos S. Caesarean birth in public maternities in Argentina: a formative research study on the views of obstetricians, midwives, and trainees.. [DOI: 10.1101/2021.05.13.21257168] [Reference Citation Analysis]
46 Jackson L, Al-Janabi H, Roberts T, Ross J. Exploring young people's preferences for STI screening in the UK: A qualitative study and discrete choice experiment. Soc Sci Med 2021;279:113945. [PMID: 34010779 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113945] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
47 Craig BM. United States COVID-19 Vaccination Preferences (CVP): 2020 Hindsight. Patient 2021;14:309-18. [PMID: 33783724 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-021-00508-0] [Cited by in Crossref: 25] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18] [Article Influence: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
48 Gijsbers M, Keizer IE, Schouten SE, Trompert JL, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM, van Til JA. Public Preferences in Priority Setting when Admitting Patients to the ICU During the COVID-19 Crisis: A Pilot Study. Patient 2021;14:331-8. [PMID: 33748930 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-021-00504-4] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
49 Singh M, Rathi R. Investigation and modeling of lean six sigma barriers in small and medium-sized industries using hybrid ISM-SEM approach. IJLSS 2021;12:1115-45. [DOI: 10.1108/ijlss-09-2020-0146] [Cited by in Crossref: 17] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19] [Article Influence: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
50 van Overbeeke E, Hauber B, Michelsen S, Goldman M, Simoens S, Huys I. Patient Preferences to Assess Value IN Gene Therapies: Protocol Development for the PAVING Study in Hemophilia. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021;8:595797. [PMID: 33768101 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.595797] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
51 Jimenez-Moreno AC, van Overbeeke E, Pinto CA, Smith I, Sharpe J, Ormrod J, Whichello C, de Bekker-Grob EW, Bullok K, Levitan B, Huys I, de Wit GA, Gorman G. Patient Preferences in Rare Diseases: A Qualitative Study in Neuromuscular Disorders to Inform a Quantitative Preference Study. Patient 2021;14:601-12. [PMID: 33660162 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00482-z] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
52 Petrocchi S, Janssens R, Oliveri S, Arnou R, Durosini I, Guiddi P, Louis E, Vandevelde M, Nackaerts K, Smith MY, Galli G, de Marinis F, Gianoncelli L, Pravettoni G, Huys I. What Matters Most to Lung Cancer Patients? A Qualitative Study in Italy and Belgium to Investigate Patient Preferences. Front Pharmacol 2021;12:602112. [PMID: 33746750 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.602112] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
53 Dobra RA, Boeri M, Elborn S, Kee F, Madge S, Davies JC. Discrete choice experiment (DCE) to quantify the influence of trial features on the decision to participate in cystic fibrosis (CF) clinical trials. BMJ Open 2021;11:e045803. [PMID: 33653764 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045803] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
54 Slejko JF, Hong YD, Sullivan JL, Reed RM, dosReis S. Prioritization and Refinement of Patient-Informed Value Elements as Attributes for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Treatment Preferences. Patient 2021;14:569-79. [PMID: 33554310 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-021-00495-2] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
55 Durosini I, Janssens R, Arnou R, Veldwijk J, Smith MY, Monzani D, Smith I, Galli G, Garassino M, Katz EG, Bailo L, Louis E, Vandevelde M, Nackaerts K, de Wit GA, Pravettoni G, Huys I. Patient Preferences for Lung Cancer Treatment: A Qualitative Study Protocol Among Advanced Lung Cancer Patients. Front Public Health 2021;9:622154. [PMID: 33634069 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.622154] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
56 Beckham SW, Crossnohere NL, Gross M, Bridges JFP. Eliciting Preferences for HIV Prevention Technologies: A Systematic Review. Patient 2021;14:151-74. [PMID: 33319339 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00486-9] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
57 Reaney M, Rodriguez AM. Patient Experience Information: Streamlining and Harmonizing the Collection of Patient Preference and Patient-Reported Outcomes Data. Pharmaceut Med 2020;34:309-14. [PMID: 33156510 DOI: 10.1007/s40290-020-00356-7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
58 van Overbeeke E, Michelsen S, Hauber B, Peerlinck K, Hermans C, Lambert C, Goldman M, Simoens S, Huys I. Patient perspectives regarding gene therapy in haemophilia: Interviews from the PAVING study. Haemophilia 2021;27:129-36. [PMID: 33161616 DOI: 10.1111/hae.14190] [Cited by in Crossref: 14] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15] [Article Influence: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
59 Ge X, Tong H, Song Y, He H, Li S, Hong J, Wang W. The caring experience and supportive care needs of male partners for women with gynaecologic cancer: A qualitative literature review. J Clin Nurs 2020;29:4469-81. [PMID: 32949056 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15501] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
60 Brennan L, Chin S, Molenaar A, Barklamb AM, Lim MS, Reid M, Truby H, Jenkins EL, McCaffrey TA. Beyond Body Weight: Design and Validation of Psycho-Behavioural Living and Eating for Health Segments (LEHS) Profiles for Social Marketing. Nutrients 2020;12:E2882. [PMID: 32967237 DOI: 10.3390/nu12092882] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
61 Al-Janabi H, Coles J, Copping J, Dhanji N, McLoughlin C, Murphy J, Nicholls J. Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in Health Economics Methodology Research: Reflections and Recommendations. Patient 2021;14:421-7. [PMID: 32939688 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00445-4] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
62 Costa S, Regier DA, Raymakers AJN, Pollard S. Genomic Testing for Relapsed and Refractory Lymphoid Cancers: Understanding Patient Values. Patient 2021;14:187-96. [PMID: 32875479 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00448-1] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
63 Shields GE, Brown L, Wells A, Capobianco L, Vass C. Utilising Patient and Public Involvement in Stated Preference Research in Health: Learning from the Existing Literature and a Case Study. Patient 2021;14:399-412. [PMID: 32748242 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00439-2] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
64 Wagner L, Frisch M, Turner-Brown L, Andrews S, Edwards A, Moultrie R, Alvarez Rivas A, Wheeler A, Raspa M. Preferences for the research use of electronic health records among young adults with fragile X syndrome or autism spectrum disorder. Disabil Health J 2020;13:100927. [PMID: 32360031 DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100927] [Reference Citation Analysis]
65 Mccarthy MC, De Abreu Lourenco R, Mcmillan LJ, Meshcheriakova E, Cao A, Gillam L. Finding Out What Matters in Decision-Making Related to Genomics and Personalized Medicine in Pediatric Oncology: Developing Attributes to Include in a Discrete Choice Experiment. Patient 2020;13:347-61. [DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00411-0] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10] [Article Influence: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]