BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Horton R, Lucassen A. Consent and Autonomy in the Genomics Era. Curr Genet Med Rep 2019;7:85-91. [PMID: 31281738 DOI: 10.1007/s40142-019-00164-9] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Ralefala D, Kasule M, Wonkam A, Matshaba M, de Vries J. Should Feedback of Individual Results be Integrated into the Consent Process in African Genomics? Participants' Views from an HIV-TB Genomics Research Project in Botswana. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2021;:1-9. [PMID: 34197280 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2021.1941414] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Schmitz D, Henn W. The fetus in the age of the genome. Hum Genet 2021. [PMID: 34426855 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-021-02348-2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Speechly C, Stenhouse R, Berman Y, Barlow-Stewart K, Fleming J, Petrie D, Culling B. Genetic counselors, patients', and carers' views on an Australian clinical genetics service information system. J Genet Couns 2021. [PMID: 33866647 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1412] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Horton R, Lucassen A. Genomic testing in healthcare: a hybrid space where clinical practice and research need to co-exist. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2019;19:963-7. [PMID: 31603004 DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2019.1672540] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Ballard LM, Horton RH, Dheensa S, Fenwick A, Lucassen AM. Exploring broad consent in the context of the 100,000 Genomes Project: a mixed methods study. Eur J Hum Genet 2020;28:732-41. [PMID: 31919452 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-019-0570-7] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Costa A, Franková V, Robert G, Macek M, Patch C, Alexander E, Arellanesova A, Clayton-Smith J, Hunter A, Havlovicová M, Pourová R, Pritchard M, Roberts L, Zoubková V, Metcalfe A. Co-designing models for the communication of genomic results for rare diseases: a comparative study in the Czech Republic and the United Kingdom. J Community Genet 2022. [PMID: 35523996 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-022-00589-w] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 McDermott JH. Genetic testing in the acute setting: a round table discussion. J Med Ethics 2020;46:531-2. [PMID: 32651253 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2019-106043] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Smith J, Braithwaite J, O’brien TA, Smith S, Tyrrell VJ, Mould EVA, Long JC, Rapport F. Re-Imagining the Data Collection and Analysis Research Process by Proposing a Rapid Qualitative Data Collection and Analytic Roadmap Applied to the Dynamic Context of Precision Medicine. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2022;21:160940692211030. [DOI: 10.1177/16094069221103097] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Singh S, Cadigan RJ, Moodley K. Research-Related Stakeholders' Perspectives on Sociocultural Considerations in Biobanking Practice in South Africa. Biopreserv Biobank 2022. [PMID: 35759422 DOI: 10.1089/bio.2021.0149] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 O'Sullivan L, Crowley R, McAuliffe É, Doran P. Contributory factors to the evolution of the concept and practice of informed consent in clinical research: A narrative review. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2020;19:100634. [PMID: 33024880 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100634] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Davies G, Butow P, Napier CE, Bartley N, Juraskova I, Meiser B, Ballinger ML, Thomas DM, Schlub TE, Best MC; members of the PiGeOn Project. Advanced Cancer Patient Knowledge of and Attitudes towards Tumor Molecular Profiling. Transl Oncol 2020;13:100799. [PMID: 32450551 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100799] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Filoche S, Stone P, Cram F, Bacharach S, Dowell A, Sika-Paotonu D, Beard A, Ormandy J, Buchanan C, Thunders M, Dew K. Uncovering social structures and informational prejudices to reduce inequity in delivery and uptake of new molecular technologies. J Med Ethics 2020;46:763-7. [PMID: 31911498 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105734] [Reference Citation Analysis]