BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Schneider J, Ye D, Hill AM, Whitehorn AS. Continued post-retraction citation of a fraudulent clinical trial report, 11 years after it was retracted for falsifying data. Scientometrics 2020;125:2877-913. [DOI: 10.1007/s11192-020-03631-1] [Cited by in Crossref: 23] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24] [Article Influence: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Kohl CBS, Faggion CM Jr. A comprehensive overview of studies that assessed article retractions within the biomedical sciences. Account Res 2023;:1-19. [PMID: 36469621 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2154660] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Frasco PE, Smith BB, Murray AW, Khurmi N, Mueller JT, Poterack KA. Context Analysis of Continued Citation of Retracted Manuscripts Published in Anesthesiology Journals. Anesth Analg 2022;135:1011-20. [PMID: 36269987 DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006195] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Schneider J, Blickhan S, Dawson S, Mehmani B, Pfeiffer N. The role of the information community in ensuring that information is authoritative: Strategies from NISO Plus 2022. ISU 2022. [DOI: 10.3233/isu-220169] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Heibi I, Peroni S. A protocol to gather, characterize and analyze incoming citations of retracted articles. PLoS ONE 2022;17:e0270872. [DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270872] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Yang S, Qi F, Diao H, Ajiferukea I. Do retraction practices work effectively? Evidence from citations of psychological retracted articles. Journal of Information Science. [DOI: 10.1177/01655515221097623] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Balke W, Kroll H, Fu Y, Schneider J, de Waard A. 2nd Workshop on Digital Infrastructures for Scholarly Content Objects (DISCO'22). Proceedings of the 22nd ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries 2022. [DOI: 10.1145/3529372.3530943] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 de Ridder J. How to trust a scientist. Stud Hist Philos Sci 2022;93:11-20. [PMID: 35247820 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.02.003] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Wang P, Su J. Expert-recommended biomedical journal articles: Their retractions or corrections, and post-retraction citing. Journal of Information Science. [DOI: 10.1177/01655515221074329] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Park Y, West RA, Pathmendra P, Favier B, Stoeger T, Capes-Davis A, Cabanac G, Labbé C, Byrne JA. Identification of human gene research articles with wrongly identified nucleotide sequences. Life Sci Alliance 2022;5:e202101203. [PMID: 35022248 DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202101203] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Bordignon F. Critical citations in knowledge construction and citation analysis: from paradox to definition. Scientometrics. [DOI: 10.1007/s11192-021-04226-0] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Leaphart DM, Cronley AC, Brothers TE. Misrepresentation of Scientific Figures. Integrity of Scientific Research 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-99680-2_15] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Rzymski P. Retraction in the online world—Shall we rethink the policy? Science and Public Policy 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scab085] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Nicholson JM, Mordaunt M, Lopez P, Uppala A, Rosati D, Rodrigues NP, Grabitz P, Rife SC. scite: A smart citation index that displays the context of citations and classifies their intent using deep learning. Quantitative Science Studies 2021;2:882-98. [DOI: 10.1162/qss_a_00146] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Siler K. L’Affaire Strumia reveals troubling gatekeeping values and outcomes at Quantitative Science Studies. Quantitative Science Studies 2021;2:1119-22. [DOI: 10.1162/qss_c_00153] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
15 Schneider J, De Waard A, Balke W, Wang X, Song N, Hua B, Fu Y. Digital Infrastructures for Scholarly Content Objects. 2021 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL) 2021. [DOI: 10.1109/jcdl52503.2021.00069] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
16 Marco-cuenca G, Salvador-oliván JA, Arquero-avilés R. Fraud in scientific publications in the European Union. An analysis through their retractions. Scientometrics 2021;126:5143-64. [DOI: 10.1007/s11192-021-03977-0] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
17 Nicholson J, Mordaunt M, Lopez P, Uppala A, Rosati D, Rodrigues N, Grabitz P, Rife S. scite: a smart citation index that displays the context of citations and classifies their intent using deep learning.. [DOI: 10.1101/2021.03.15.435418] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
18 Santos-d’amorim K, Correia AEGC, Miranda MKFDO, Santa-cruz P. Reasons and implications of retracted articles in Brazil. Transinformação 2021;33:e210001. [DOI: 10.1590/2318-0889202133e210001] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
19 [DOI: 10.1101/2021.07.29.453321] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Reference Citation Analysis]