BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Wynn J, Martinez J, Duong J, Zhang Y, Phelan J, Fyer A, Klitzman R, Appelbaum PS, Chung WK. Association of Researcher Characteristics with Views on Return of Incidental Findings from Genomic Research. J Genet Couns 2015;24:833-41. [PMID: 25592144 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9817-1] [Cited by in Crossref: 15] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Parker LS, Sankar PL, Boyer J, Jean Mcewen J, Kaufman D. Normative and conceptual ELSI research: what it is, and why it’s important. Genet Med 2019;21:505-9. [DOI: 10.1038/s41436-018-0065-x] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Hurlimann T, Jaitovich Groisman I, Godard B. Exploring neurologists' perspectives on the return of next generation sequencing results to their patients: a needed step in the development of guidelines. BMC Med Ethics 2018;19:81. [PMID: 30268121 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-018-0320-3] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Wynn J. Genomic Testing: a Genetic Counselor's Personal Reflection on Three Years of Consenting and Testing. J Genet Couns 2016;25:691-7. [PMID: 26242468 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9868-y] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15] [Article Influence: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Yu JH, Appelbaum PS, Brothers KB, Joffe S, Kauffman TL, Koenig BA, Prince AE, Scollon S, Wolf SM, Bernhardt BA, Wilfond BS; Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) Consortium Informed Consent and Governance Working Group. Consent for clinical genome sequencing: considerations from the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium. Per Med 2019;16:325-33. [PMID: 31313633 DOI: 10.2217/pme-2018-0076] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Wynn J, Martinez J, Bulafka J, Duong J, Zhang Y, Chiuzan C, Preti J, Cremona ML, Jobanputra V, Fyer AJ, Klitzman RL, Appelbaum PS, Chung WK. Impact of Receiving Secondary Results from Genomic Research: A 12-Month Longitudinal Study. J Genet Couns 2018;27:709-22. [PMID: 29168042 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0172-x] [Cited by in Crossref: 15] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Delanne J, Nambot S, Chassagne A, Putois O, Pelissier A, Peyron C, Gautier E, Thevenon J, Cretin E, Bruel AL, Goussot V, Ghiringhelli F, Boidot R, Tran Mau-Them F, Philippe C, Vitobello A, Demougeot L, Vernin C, Lapointe AS, Bardou M, Luu M, Binquet C, Lejeune C, Joly L, Juif C, Baurand A, Sawka C, Bertolone G, Duffourd Y, Sanlaville D, Pujol P, Geneviève D, Houdayer F, Thauvin-Robinet C, Faivre L. Secondary findings from whole-exome/genome sequencing evaluating stakeholder perspectives. A review of the literature. Eur J Med Genet 2019;62:103529. [PMID: 30165243 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.08.010] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18] [Article Influence: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Sapp JC, Johnston JJ, Driscoll K, Heidlebaugh AR, Miren Sagardia A, Dogbe DN, Umstead KL, Turbitt E, Alevizos I, Baron J, Bönnemann C, Brooks B, Donkervoort S, Jee YH, Linehan WM, McMahon FJ, Moss J, Mullikin JC, Nielsen D, Pelayo E, Remaley AT, Siegel R, Su H, Zarate C, Manolio TA, Biesecker BB, Biesecker LG; NISC Comparative Sequencing Program. Evaluation of Recipients of Positive and Negative Secondary Findings Evaluations in a Hybrid CLIA-Research Sequencing Pilot. Am J Hum Genet 2018;103:358-66. [PMID: 30122538 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.07.018] [Cited by in Crossref: 24] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21] [Article Influence: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Vears DF, Minion JT, Roberts SJ, Cummings J, Machirori M, Blell M, Budin-Ljøsne I, Cowley L, Dyke SOM, Gaff C, Green R, Hall A, Johns AL, Knoppers BM, Mulrine S, Patch C, Winkler E, Murtagh MJ. Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives. PLoS One 2021;16:e0258646. [PMID: 34748551 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258646] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Gourna EG, Armstrong N, Wallace SE. Compare and contrast: a cross-national study across UK, USA and Greek experts regarding return of incidental findings from clinical sequencing. Eur J Hum Genet 2016;24:344-9. [PMID: 26059844 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.132] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Wynn J, Martinez J, Duong J, Chiuzan C, Phelan JC, Fyer A, Klitzman RL, Appelbaum PS, Chung WK. Research Participants’ Preferences for Hypothetical Secondary Results from Genomic Research. J Genet Counsel 2017;26:841-51. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-0059-2] [Cited by in Crossref: 24] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Similuk MN, Yan J, Setzer MR, Jamal L, Littel P, Lenardo M, Su HC. Exome sequencing study in a clinical research setting finds general acceptance of study returning secondary genomic findings with little decisional conflict. J Genet Couns 2021;30:766-73. [PMID: 33320394 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1367] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Stein CM, Ponsaran R, Trapl ES, Goldenberg AJ. Experiences and perspectives on the return of secondary findings among genetic epidemiologists. Genet Med 2019;21:1541-7. [PMID: 30467403 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-018-0369-x] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Scheuner MT, Russell MM, Chanfreau-Coffinier C, Peredo J, Yano EM, Hamilton AB, Lerner B, Provenzale D, Knight SJ, Voils CI. Stakeholders' views on the value of outcomes from clinical genetic and genomic interventions. Genet Med 2019;21:1371-80. [PMID: 30377384 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-018-0344-6] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Mackley MP, Fletcher B, Parker M, Watkins H, Ormondroyd E. Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Genet Med 2017;19:283-93. [PMID: 27584911 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2016.109] [Cited by in Crossref: 74] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 70] [Article Influence: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]