BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Quinlan-jones E, Hillman SC, Kilby MD, Greenfield SM. Parental experiences of prenatal whole exome sequencing (WES) in cases of ultrasound diagnosed fetal structural anomaly. Prenatal Diagnosis 2017;37:1225-31. [DOI: 10.1002/pd.5172] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Lou S, Jensen AH, Vogel I. How are uncertain prenatal genetic results perceived and managed two years after they were received? A qualitative interview study. J Genet Couns 2021;30:1191-202. [PMID: 33830585 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1402] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Kuiper JM, Borry P, Vears DF, Van Hoyweghen I. The social shaping of a diagnosis in Next Generation Sequencing. New Genetics and Society 2021;40:425-48. [DOI: 10.1080/14636778.2020.1853514] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Ferretti L, Mellis R, Chitty LS. Update on the use of exome sequencing in the diagnosis of fetal abnormalities. Eur J Med Genet 2019;62:103663. [PMID: 31085342 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2019.05.002] [Cited by in Crossref: 22] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13] [Article Influence: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Tolusso LK, Hazelton P, Wong B, Swarr DT. Beyond diagnostic yield: prenatal exome sequencing results in maternal, neonatal, and familial clinical management changes. Genet Med 2021;23:909-17. [PMID: 33442022 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-01067-9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Pratt M, Garritty C, Thuku M, Esmaeilisaraji L, Hamel C, Hartley T, Millar K, Skidmore B, Dougan S, Armour CM. Application of exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis: a rapid scoping review. Genet Med 2020;22:1925-34. [PMID: 32747765 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-0918-y] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Kilby MD. The role of next-generation sequencing in the investigation of ultrasound-identified fetal structural anomalies. BJOG 2021;128:420-9. [PMID: 32975887 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16533] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Narayanan S, Blumberg B, Clayman ML, Pan V, Wicklund C. Exploring the Issues Surrounding Clinical Exome Sequencing in the Prenatal Setting. J Genet Counsel 2018;27:1228-37. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-018-0245-5] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Mellis R, Chandler N, Chitty LS. Next-generation sequencing and the impact on prenatal diagnosis. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2018;18:689-99. [PMID: 29962246 DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2018.1493924] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13] [Article Influence: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Brown JEH, Zamora AN, Outram S, Sparks TN, Lianoglou BR, Norstad M, Sahin Hodoglugil NN, Norton ME, Ackerman SL. “Let’s Just Wait Until She’s Born”: Temporal Factors That Shape Decision-Making for Prenatal Genomic Sequencing Amongst Families Underrepresented in Genomic Research. Front Genet 2022;13:882703. [DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.882703] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Horn R, Parker M. Health professionals' and researchers' perspectives on prenatal whole genome and exome sequencing: 'We can't shut the door now, the genie's out, we need to refine it'. PLoS One 2018;13:e0204158. [PMID: 30240445 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204158] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Alanazi EM, Alanzi TM, Wu M, Luo J. Patients’ unmet information needs and gaps of obstetric ultrasound exam: A qualitative content analysis of social media platforms. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked 2022;28:100830. [DOI: 10.1016/j.imu.2021.100830] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Harris S, Gilmore K, Hardisty E, Lyerly AD, Vora NL. Ethical and counseling challenges in prenatal exome sequencing. Prenat Diagn 2018;38:897-903. [PMID: 30171820 DOI: 10.1002/pd.5353] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Hammond J, Klapwijk JE, Hill M, Lou S, Ormond KE, Diderich KEM, Riedijk S, Lewis C. Parental experiences of uncertainty following an abnormal fetal anomaly scan: Insights using Han's taxonomy of uncertainty. J Genet Couns 2021;30:198-210. [PMID: 32638447 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1311] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Yang Y, Yassan L, Leung EKY, Yeo KJ. Smith-Lemli-Opitz Syndrome in a newborn infant with developmental abnormalities and low endogenous cholesterol. Clin Chim Acta 2018;479:208-11. [PMID: 29355488 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.01.027] [Reference Citation Analysis]
15 Kernie CG, Wynn J, Rosenbaum A, de Voest J, Galloway S, Giordano J, Stover S, Westerfield L, Gilmore K, Wapner RJ, Van den Veyver IB, Vora NL, Clifton RG, Caughey AB, Chung WK. Information is power: The experiences, attitudes and needs of individuals who chose to have prenatal genomic sequencing for fetal anomalies. Prenat Diagn 2022. [PMID: 35476893 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6153] [Reference Citation Analysis]
16 Riedijk S, Diderich K, Galjaard R, Srebniak G. Genome Sequencing in Prenatal Testing and Screening: Lessons Learned From Broadening the Scope of Prenatal Genetics From Conventional Karyotyping to Whole-Genome Microarray Analysis. Clinical Genome Sequencing. Elsevier; 2019. pp. 157-80. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-813335-4.00010-6] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
17 Buchanan J, Hill M, Vass CM, Hammond J, Riedijk S, Klapwijk JE, Harding E, Lou S, Vogel I, Hui L, Ingvoldstad-Malmgren C, Soller MJ, Ormond KE, Choolani M, Zheng Q, Chitty LS, Lewis C. Factor's that impact on women's decision-making around prenatal genomic tests: An international discrete choice survey. Prenat Diagn 2022. [PMID: 35476801 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6159] [Reference Citation Analysis]
18 Harding E, Hammond J, Chitty LS, Hill M, Lewis C. Couples experiences of receiving uncertain results following prenatal microarray or exome sequencing: A mixed-methods systematic review. Prenat Diagn 2020;40:1028-39. [PMID: 32362033 DOI: 10.1002/pd.5729] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
19 Plantinga M, Zwienenberg L, van Dijk E, Breet H, Diphoorn J, El Mecky J, Bouman K, Verheij J, Birnie E, Ranchor AV, Corsten-Janssen N, van Langen IM. Parental experiences of rapid exome sequencing in cases with major ultrasound anomalies during pregnancy. Prenat Diagn 2021. [PMID: 34643287 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6056] [Reference Citation Analysis]
20 Castleman JS, Wall E, Allen S, Williams D, Doyle S, Kilby MD. The prenatal exome - a door to prenatal diagnostics? Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2021;21:465-74. [PMID: 33877000 DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2021.1920398] [Reference Citation Analysis]