临床经验
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2008.
世界华人消化杂志. 2008-08-28; 16(24): 2780-2784
在线出版 2008-08-28. doi: 10.11569/wcjd.v16.i24.2780
表1 三组中肝功能正常者与肝功能异常者的AFP、CEA、CA19-9比较
nAFP(μg/L) CEA(μg/L) CA19-9(kIU/L)
恶性肿瘤组
肝功能正常组1493.91±13.2660.82±196.7289.65±211.41
肝功能异常组35362.78±947.5258.52±181.84123.28±221.57
组间比较z = -3.917z = -0.654z = -1.973
P = 0.000P = 0.513P = 0.048
良性肝胆胰疾病组
肝功能正常组325.52±14.422.87±2.2244.43±98.00
肝功能异常组388.19±23.352.79±1.7653.59±63.88
组间比较z = -0.407z = -0.012z = -1.757
P = 0.684P = 0.991P = 0.079
普通疾病组
肝功能正常组4992.61±1.992.42±1.5115.48±11.83
肝功能异常组923.77±6.492.71±1.6818.05±13.85
组间比较z = -2.252z = -1.569z = -1.141
P = 0.024P = 0.117P = 0.254
表2 不同三组中AFP、CEA、CA19-9与肝功能各指标的相关性比较
AFP
CEA
CA19-9
rPrPr P
恶性肿瘤组
TBIL-0.0060.937-0.0210.7730.2820.000
DBIL-0.0020.974-0.0250.7390.2810.000
IDBIL-0.0070.925-0.0130.8660.2630.000
ALT0.0120.876-0.0640.3900.1720.020
AST0.0600.420-0.0290.7010.0880.234
γ-GT0.1110.1320.0000.9960.0980.188
ALP0.0680.359-0.0390.6030.0940.206
TBA0.0390.604-0.0750.3130.2440.001
良性肝胆胰疾病组
TBIL0.0510.673-0.0250.8380.3390.004
DBIL0.0540.659-0.0420.7310.3210.007
IDBIL0.0800.511-0.0080.9500.3200.007
ALT0.0610.618-0.1540.2040.2950.013
AST0.1570.195-0.0610.6180.3820.001
γ-GT0.1090.371-0.1340.2700.2870.016
ALP0.1140.349-0.0740.5450.3560.002
TBA0.2140.076-0.0210.8630.2570.032
普通疾病组
TBIL0.0820.0450.0590.1520.1150.005
DBIL0.1330.0010.0650.1170.1380.001
IDBIL0.0520.2100.0420.3090.0890.030
ALT0.0500.2210.0290.4860.0400.327
AST0.0330.4420.0520.2090.1100.008
γ-GT0.1900.0000.1710.0000.0630.125
ALP0.0000.9910.1390.0000.0660.109
TBA-0.0610.141-0.0460.2650.0370.370
表3 AFP、CA19-9分别与肝功能各指标的多重线性回归分析
非标准化系数
标准化系数Betat Sig.
BStd. Error
AFP(Constant)9.96511.3000.8820.378
γ-GT0.1360.0670.1072.0820.044
CA19-9(Constant)17.5165.8502.9940.003
TBIL2.3931.0640.5832.2490.025
ALP0.1010.0490.1002.0780.038

引文著录: 阮水良, 毕军. 肝功能生化指标对常用肿瘤标志物检测的影响. 世界华人消化杂志 2008; 16(24): 2780-2784