Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2025; 31(5): 102249
Published online Feb 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i5.102249
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of triglyceride glucose index < 1.79 and triglyceride glucose index ≥ 1.79, n (%)
Variables
Overall (n = 300)
Low TyG index (n = 164)
High TyG index (n = 136)
P value
BMI, kg/m2, mean ± SD22.71 ± 2.9322.12 ± 2.8623.42 ± 2.86< 0.001a
Fasting glucose, mg/dL, mean ± SD6.53 ± 1.775.20 ± 1.028.13 ± 0.99< 0.001a
Fasting triglycerides, mg/dL, mean ± SD1.74 ± 0.411.45 ± 0.272.09 ± 0.23< 0.001a
Tyg index, mean ± SD1.67 ± 0.541.29 ± 0.432.12 ± 0.22< 0.001a
Age, years0.514
< 60135 (45.00)71 (43.29)64 (47.06)
≥ 60165 (55.00)93 (56.71)72 (52.94)
Sex0.833
Female152 (50.67)84 (51.22)68 (50.00)
Male148 (49.33)80 (48.78)68 (50.00)
Drinking history0.387
No204 (68.00)115 (64.02)89 (65.44)
Yes92 (32.00)49 (29.88)47 (34.56)
Smoking history0.859
No208 (69.33)113 (68.90)95 (69.85)
Yes92 (30.67)51 (31.10)41 (30.15)
ECOG0.583
0198 (66.00)106 (64.63)92 (67.65)
1102 (34.00)58 (35.37)44 (32.35)
Site0.054
Stomach150 (50.17)74 (45.12)64 (47.06)
Gastric and esophageal binding149 (49.83)90 (54.88)72 (52.94)
Histological0.189
Adenocarcinoma216 (72.00)113 (68.90)103 (75.74)
Other84 (28.00)51 (31.10)33 (24.26)
CEA, ng/mL0.188
< 390 (30.00)44 (26.81)46 (33.82)
≥ 3210 (72.00)120 (73.17)90 (66.18)
AFP, ng/mL0.169
< 15253 (84.33)134 (81.71)119 (87.50)
≥ 1547 (15.67)30 (18.29)17 (12.50)
CA-199, ng/mL0.071
< 37184 (61.33)93 (56.71)91 (66.91)
≥ 37116 (38.67)71 (43.29)45 (33.09)
Liver metastasis0.798
No194 (64.67)105 (70.12)89 (65.44)
Yes106 (35.33)59 (35.98)47 (34.56)
Peritoneal metastasis0.423
No241 (80.33)129 (78.66)112 (82.35)
Yes59 (19.67)35 (21.34)24 (17.65)
EBV status0.390
No-infect253 (84.33)141 (85.98)112 (82.35)
Infect47 (15.67)23 (14.02)24 (17.65)
PD-L1 expression0.059
CPS < 551 (17.00)34 (20.73)17 (12.50)
CPS ≥ 5249 (83.00)130 (79.27)119 (87.50)
MMR status0.125
pMMR289 (96.33)155 (94.51)134 (98.53)
dMMR11 (3.67)9 (5.49)2 (1.47)
Table 2 Tumor responses of triglyceride glucose index < 1.79 and triglyceride glucose index ≥ 1.79, n (%)
Variables
Low TyG index (n = 164)
High TyG index (n = 136)
χ2
P value
CR
0164 (100.00)135 (99.26)
10 (0.00)1 (0.74)
PR
0149 (90.85)112 (82.35)
115 (9.15)24 (17.65)
SD
0102 (62.20)81 (59.56)
162 (37.80)55 (40.44)
PD
077 (46.95)80 (58.82)
187 (53.05)56 (41.18)
ORR5.490.020a
0149 (90.85)111 (81.62)
115 (9.15)25 (18.38)
DCR4.200.040a
087 (53.05)56 (41.18)
177 (46.95)80 (58.82)
Table 3 Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for progression-free survival
FactorsUnivariate
Multivariate
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
Age (≥ 60 vs < 60), years0.83 (0.62-1.12)0.222
Sex (male vs female)1.01 (0.75-1.35) 0.954
Drinking history (yes vs no)0.97 (0.71-1.33)0.866
Smoking history (yes vs no)0.96 (0.70-1.33)0.818
Site (stomach vs gastric and esophageal binding)1.14 (0.85-1.53)0.388
ECOG (0 vs 1)1.86 (1.36-2.54)< 0.001a1.58 (1.14-2.20)0.006a
Histological (others vs adenocarcinoma)0.94 (0.68-1.31)0.732
TyG (low vs high)0.58 (0.43-0.79)< 0.001a0.66 (0.48-0.90)0.010a
CEA (< 3 vs ≥ 3), ng/mL1.27 (0.91-1.76)0.159
AFP (≥ 15 vs < 15), ng/mL0.79 (0.50-1.23)0.298
CA-199 (< 37 vs ≥ 37), ng/mL1.22 (0.91-1.64)0.188
Liver metastasis (yes vs no)0.89 (0.65-1.21)0.459
Peritoneal metastasis (no vs yes)1.02 (0.71-1.49)0.899
EBV status (infect vs no-infect)0.82 (0.55-1.23)0.341
PD-L1 expression (CPS < 5 vs CPS ≥ 5)0.27 (0.18-0.40)< 0.001a0.37 (0.25-0.56)< 0.001a
MMR status (pMMR vs dMMR)2.61 (0.97-7.03)0.058
BMI (< 25 vs ≥ 25), kg/m20.55 (0.37-0.82)0.003a0.56 (0.38-0.84)0.005a
Table 4 Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for overall survival
FactorsUnivariate
Multivariate
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
Age (≥ 60 vs < 60), years0.86 (0.59-1.24)0.410
Sex (male vs female)1.16 (0.80-1.67)0.434
Drinking history (no vs yes)1.14 (0.78-1.67)0.503
Smoking history (no vs yes)1.12 (0.76-1.64)0.567
Site (stomach vs gastric and esophageal binding)1.10 (0.76-1.60)0.613
ECOG (0 vs 1)1.90 (1.27-2.86)0.002a1.68 (1.10-2.59)0.017a
Histological (others vs adenocarcinoma)0.86 (0.58-1.28)0.466
TyG (low vs high)0.33 (0.22-0.50)< 0.001a0.36 (0.24-0.55)< 0.001a
CEA (< 3 vs ≥ 3), ng/mL1.11 (0.73-1.69)0.635
AFP (< 15 vs ≥ 15), ng/mL1.15 (0.69-1.93)0.593
CA-199 (< 37 vs ≥ 37), ng/mL1.23 (0.85-1.79)0.267
Liver metastasis (no vs yes)1.20 (0.83-1.74)0.335
Peritoneal metastasis (no vs yes)1.27 (0.81-1.98)0.294
EBV status (infect vs no-infect)0.77 (0.45-1.33)0.355
PD-L1 expression (CPS < 5 vs CPS ≥ 5)0.31 (0.19-0.51)< 0.001a0.49 (0.29-0.82)0.007a
MMR status (pMMR vs dMMR)1.21 (0.45-3.30)0.707
BMI (< 25 vs ≥ 25), kg/m20.72 (0.45-1.14)0.159
Table 5 Comparison of features between the training and validation sets, n (%)
Characteristic
Test (n = 90)
Train (n = 210)
χ2
P value
Age, years1.940.164
< 6046 (51.11)89 (42.38)
≥ 6044 (48.89)121 (57.62)
Sex0.430.512
Female43 (47.78)109 (51.90)
Male47 (52.22)101 (48.10)
BMI, kg/m20.210.646
< 2569 (76.67)166 (79.05)
≥ 2521 (23.33)44 (20.95)
TyG 0.310.578
Low47 (52.22)117 (55.71)
High43 (47.78)93 (44.29)
Drinking history0.240.627
No63 (70.00)141 (67.14)
Yes27 (30.00)69 (32.86)
Smoking history1.580.209
No67 (74.44)141 (67.14)
Yes23 (25.56)69 (32.86)
ECOG0.410.523
057 (63.33)141 (67.14)
133 (36.67)69 (32.86)
Site0.080.772
Stomach44 (48.89)106 (50.72)
Gastric and esophageal binding46 (51.11)103 (49.28)
Histological1.390.239
Adenocarcinoma21 (23.33)63 (30.00)
Other69 (76.67)147 (70.00)
CEA, ng/mL3.700.054
< 334 (37.78)56 (26.67)
≥ 356 (62.22)154 (73.33)
AFP, ng/mL1.830.176
< 1572 (80.00)181 (86.19)
≥ 1518 (20.00)29 (13.81)
CA-199, ng/mL1.540.214
< 3760 (66.67)124 (59.05)
≥ 3730 (33.33)86 (40.95)
Liver metastasis1.600.206
No63 (70.00)131 (62.38)
Yes27 (30.00)79 (37.62)
Peritoneal metastasis0.730.392
No75 (83.33)166 (62.38)
Yes15 (16.67)79 (37.62)
EBV status0.100.578
No-infect75 (83.33)178 (84.76)
Infect15 (16.67)32 (15.24)
PD-L1 expression0.600.440
CPS < 513 (14.44)38 (18.10)
CPS ≥ 577 (85.56)172 (81.90)
MMR status0.020.893
pMMR4 (4.44)7 (3.33)
dMMR86 (95.56)203 (96.67)
Table 6 Adverse events associated with sintilimab plus chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients, n (%)
Variables
Low TyG index (n = 164)
High TyG index (n = 136)
χ2
P value
All grades: Leukopenia71 (43.29)62 (45.59)0.260.607
All grades: Anemia68 (41.46)58 (42.65)0.000.989
All grades: Neutropenia63 (38.41)50 (36.75)0.090.769
All grades: Thrombocytopenia58 (35.37)47 (34.56)0.000.959
All grades: Nausea50 (30.49)38 (27.94)0.230.630
All grades: Pyrexia40 (24.39)36 (26.47)0.170.680
All grades: Elevated ALT34 (20.73)24 (17.65)0.450.501
All grades: Elevated AST34 (20.73)22 (16.18)1.020.313
All grades: Hypothyroidism32 (19.51)31 (22.79)0.480.487
All grades: Diarrhea29 (17.68)32 (23.52)1.570.210
All grades: Hypertension24 (14.63)19 (13.97)0.030.870
All grades: Pneumonitis20 (12.20)17 (12.50)0.020.898
All grades: Proteinuria18 (10.98)12 (8.82)0.380.536
All grades: Hyperbilirubinemia17 (10.37)12 (8.82)0.200.653
All grades: Fatigue16 (9.80)13 (10.29)0.000.954
≥ 3 grades: Thrombocytopenia30 (18.29)22 (16.18)0.230.630
≥ 3 grades: Neutropenia21 (12.80)14 (10.29)0.450.500
≥ 3 grades: Leukopenia19 (11.59)15 (11.03)0.020.880
≥ 3 grades: Anemia15 (9.15)10 (7.35)0.310.576
≥ 3 grades: Diarrhea8 (4.88)6 (4.41)0.040.849
≥ 3 grades: Nausea7 (4.27)5 (3.68)0.070.795
≥ 3 grades: Elevated ALT5 (3.05)4 (2.94)0.080.775
≥ 3 grades: Elevated AST4 (5.88)2 (1.47)0.030.855
≥ 3 grades: Hypothyroidism3 (1.83)4 (2.94)0.040.833
≥ 3 grades: Hypertension3 (1.83)2 (1.47)0.050.819
≥ 3 grades: Pneumonitis3 (1.83)2 (1.47)0.050.819
≥ 3 grades: Hyperbilirubinemia2 (1.22)2 (1.47)0.090.763
≥ 3 grades: Fatigue0 (0.00)0 (0.00)--
≥ 3 grades: Pyrexia0 (0.00)0 (0.00)--
≥ 3 grades: Proteinuria0 (0.00)0 (0.00)--