Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2025; 31(5): 102249
Published online Feb 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i5.102249
Published online Feb 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i5.102249
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of triglyceride glucose index < 1.79 and triglyceride glucose index ≥ 1.79, n (%)
Variables | Overall (n = 300) | Low TyG index (n = 164) | High TyG index (n = 136) | P value |
BMI, kg/m2, mean ± SD | 22.71 ± 2.93 | 22.12 ± 2.86 | 23.42 ± 2.86 | < 0.001a |
Fasting glucose, mg/dL, mean ± SD | 6.53 ± 1.77 | 5.20 ± 1.02 | 8.13 ± 0.99 | < 0.001a |
Fasting triglycerides, mg/dL, mean ± SD | 1.74 ± 0.41 | 1.45 ± 0.27 | 2.09 ± 0.23 | < 0.001a |
Tyg index, mean ± SD | 1.67 ± 0.54 | 1.29 ± 0.43 | 2.12 ± 0.22 | < 0.001a |
Age, years | 0.514 | |||
< 60 | 135 (45.00) | 71 (43.29) | 64 (47.06) | |
≥ 60 | 165 (55.00) | 93 (56.71) | 72 (52.94) | |
Sex | 0.833 | |||
Female | 152 (50.67) | 84 (51.22) | 68 (50.00) | |
Male | 148 (49.33) | 80 (48.78) | 68 (50.00) | |
Drinking history | 0.387 | |||
No | 204 (68.00) | 115 (64.02) | 89 (65.44) | |
Yes | 92 (32.00) | 49 (29.88) | 47 (34.56) | |
Smoking history | 0.859 | |||
No | 208 (69.33) | 113 (68.90) | 95 (69.85) | |
Yes | 92 (30.67) | 51 (31.10) | 41 (30.15) | |
ECOG | 0.583 | |||
0 | 198 (66.00) | 106 (64.63) | 92 (67.65) | |
1 | 102 (34.00) | 58 (35.37) | 44 (32.35) | |
Site | 0.054 | |||
Stomach | 150 (50.17) | 74 (45.12) | 64 (47.06) | |
Gastric and esophageal binding | 149 (49.83) | 90 (54.88) | 72 (52.94) | |
Histological | 0.189 | |||
Adenocarcinoma | 216 (72.00) | 113 (68.90) | 103 (75.74) | |
Other | 84 (28.00) | 51 (31.10) | 33 (24.26) | |
CEA, ng/mL | 0.188 | |||
< 3 | 90 (30.00) | 44 (26.81) | 46 (33.82) | |
≥ 3 | 210 (72.00) | 120 (73.17) | 90 (66.18) | |
AFP, ng/mL | 0.169 | |||
< 15 | 253 (84.33) | 134 (81.71) | 119 (87.50) | |
≥ 15 | 47 (15.67) | 30 (18.29) | 17 (12.50) | |
CA-199, ng/mL | 0.071 | |||
< 37 | 184 (61.33) | 93 (56.71) | 91 (66.91) | |
≥ 37 | 116 (38.67) | 71 (43.29) | 45 (33.09) | |
Liver metastasis | 0.798 | |||
No | 194 (64.67) | 105 (70.12) | 89 (65.44) | |
Yes | 106 (35.33) | 59 (35.98) | 47 (34.56) | |
Peritoneal metastasis | 0.423 | |||
No | 241 (80.33) | 129 (78.66) | 112 (82.35) | |
Yes | 59 (19.67) | 35 (21.34) | 24 (17.65) | |
EBV status | 0.390 | |||
No-infect | 253 (84.33) | 141 (85.98) | 112 (82.35) | |
Infect | 47 (15.67) | 23 (14.02) | 24 (17.65) | |
PD-L1 expression | 0.059 | |||
CPS < 5 | 51 (17.00) | 34 (20.73) | 17 (12.50) | |
CPS ≥ 5 | 249 (83.00) | 130 (79.27) | 119 (87.50) | |
MMR status | 0.125 | |||
pMMR | 289 (96.33) | 155 (94.51) | 134 (98.53) | |
dMMR | 11 (3.67) | 9 (5.49) | 2 (1.47) |
Table 2 Tumor responses of triglyceride glucose index < 1.79 and triglyceride glucose index ≥ 1.79, n (%)
Variables | Low TyG index (n = 164) | High TyG index (n = 136) | χ2 | P value |
CR | ||||
0 | 164 (100.00) | 135 (99.26) | ||
1 | 0 (0.00) | 1 (0.74) | ||
PR | ||||
0 | 149 (90.85) | 112 (82.35) | ||
1 | 15 (9.15) | 24 (17.65) | ||
SD | ||||
0 | 102 (62.20) | 81 (59.56) | ||
1 | 62 (37.80) | 55 (40.44) | ||
PD | ||||
0 | 77 (46.95) | 80 (58.82) | ||
1 | 87 (53.05) | 56 (41.18) | ||
ORR | 5.49 | 0.020a | ||
0 | 149 (90.85) | 111 (81.62) | ||
1 | 15 (9.15) | 25 (18.38) | ||
DCR | 4.20 | 0.040a | ||
0 | 87 (53.05) | 56 (41.18) | ||
1 | 77 (46.95) | 80 (58.82) |
Table 3 Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for progression-free survival
Factors | Univariate | Multivariate | ||
HR (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value | |
Age (≥ 60 vs < 60), years | 0.83 (0.62-1.12) | 0.222 | ||
Sex (male vs female) | 1.01 (0.75-1.35) | 0.954 | ||
Drinking history (yes vs no) | 0.97 (0.71-1.33) | 0.866 | ||
Smoking history (yes vs no) | 0.96 (0.70-1.33) | 0.818 | ||
Site (stomach vs gastric and esophageal binding) | 1.14 (0.85-1.53) | 0.388 | ||
ECOG (0 vs 1) | 1.86 (1.36-2.54) | < 0.001a | 1.58 (1.14-2.20) | 0.006a |
Histological (others vs adenocarcinoma) | 0.94 (0.68-1.31) | 0.732 | ||
TyG (low vs high) | 0.58 (0.43-0.79) | < 0.001a | 0.66 (0.48-0.90) | 0.010a |
CEA (< 3 vs ≥ 3), ng/mL | 1.27 (0.91-1.76) | 0.159 | ||
AFP (≥ 15 vs < 15), ng/mL | 0.79 (0.50-1.23) | 0.298 | ||
CA-199 (< 37 vs ≥ 37), ng/mL | 1.22 (0.91-1.64) | 0.188 | ||
Liver metastasis (yes vs no) | 0.89 (0.65-1.21) | 0.459 | ||
Peritoneal metastasis (no vs yes) | 1.02 (0.71-1.49) | 0.899 | ||
EBV status (infect vs no-infect) | 0.82 (0.55-1.23) | 0.341 | ||
PD-L1 expression (CPS < 5 vs CPS ≥ 5) | 0.27 (0.18-0.40) | < 0.001a | 0.37 (0.25-0.56) | < 0.001a |
MMR status (pMMR vs dMMR) | 2.61 (0.97-7.03) | 0.058 | ||
BMI (< 25 vs ≥ 25), kg/m2 | 0.55 (0.37-0.82) | 0.003a | 0.56 (0.38-0.84) | 0.005a |
Table 4 Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for overall survival
Factors | Univariate | Multivariate | ||
HR (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value | |
Age (≥ 60 vs < 60), years | 0.86 (0.59-1.24) | 0.410 | ||
Sex (male vs female) | 1.16 (0.80-1.67) | 0.434 | ||
Drinking history (no vs yes) | 1.14 (0.78-1.67) | 0.503 | ||
Smoking history (no vs yes) | 1.12 (0.76-1.64) | 0.567 | ||
Site (stomach vs gastric and esophageal binding) | 1.10 (0.76-1.60) | 0.613 | ||
ECOG (0 vs 1) | 1.90 (1.27-2.86) | 0.002a | 1.68 (1.10-2.59) | 0.017a |
Histological (others vs adenocarcinoma) | 0.86 (0.58-1.28) | 0.466 | ||
TyG (low vs high) | 0.33 (0.22-0.50) | < 0.001a | 0.36 (0.24-0.55) | < 0.001a |
CEA (< 3 vs ≥ 3), ng/mL | 1.11 (0.73-1.69) | 0.635 | ||
AFP (< 15 vs ≥ 15), ng/mL | 1.15 (0.69-1.93) | 0.593 | ||
CA-199 (< 37 vs ≥ 37), ng/mL | 1.23 (0.85-1.79) | 0.267 | ||
Liver metastasis (no vs yes) | 1.20 (0.83-1.74) | 0.335 | ||
Peritoneal metastasis (no vs yes) | 1.27 (0.81-1.98) | 0.294 | ||
EBV status (infect vs no-infect) | 0.77 (0.45-1.33) | 0.355 | ||
PD-L1 expression (CPS < 5 vs CPS ≥ 5) | 0.31 (0.19-0.51) | < 0.001a | 0.49 (0.29-0.82) | 0.007a |
MMR status (pMMR vs dMMR) | 1.21 (0.45-3.30) | 0.707 | ||
BMI (< 25 vs ≥ 25), kg/m2 | 0.72 (0.45-1.14) | 0.159 |
Table 5 Comparison of features between the training and validation sets, n (%)
Characteristic | Test (n = 90) | Train (n = 210) | χ2 | P value |
Age, years | 1.94 | 0.164 | ||
< 60 | 46 (51.11) | 89 (42.38) | ||
≥ 60 | 44 (48.89) | 121 (57.62) | ||
Sex | 0.43 | 0.512 | ||
Female | 43 (47.78) | 109 (51.90) | ||
Male | 47 (52.22) | 101 (48.10) | ||
BMI, kg/m2 | 0.21 | 0.646 | ||
< 25 | 69 (76.67) | 166 (79.05) | ||
≥ 25 | 21 (23.33) | 44 (20.95) | ||
TyG | 0.31 | 0.578 | ||
Low | 47 (52.22) | 117 (55.71) | ||
High | 43 (47.78) | 93 (44.29) | ||
Drinking history | 0.24 | 0.627 | ||
No | 63 (70.00) | 141 (67.14) | ||
Yes | 27 (30.00) | 69 (32.86) | ||
Smoking history | 1.58 | 0.209 | ||
No | 67 (74.44) | 141 (67.14) | ||
Yes | 23 (25.56) | 69 (32.86) | ||
ECOG | 0.41 | 0.523 | ||
0 | 57 (63.33) | 141 (67.14) | ||
1 | 33 (36.67) | 69 (32.86) | ||
Site | 0.08 | 0.772 | ||
Stomach | 44 (48.89) | 106 (50.72) | ||
Gastric and esophageal binding | 46 (51.11) | 103 (49.28) | ||
Histological | 1.39 | 0.239 | ||
Adenocarcinoma | 21 (23.33) | 63 (30.00) | ||
Other | 69 (76.67) | 147 (70.00) | ||
CEA, ng/mL | 3.70 | 0.054 | ||
< 3 | 34 (37.78) | 56 (26.67) | ||
≥ 3 | 56 (62.22) | 154 (73.33) | ||
AFP, ng/mL | 1.83 | 0.176 | ||
< 15 | 72 (80.00) | 181 (86.19) | ||
≥ 15 | 18 (20.00) | 29 (13.81) | ||
CA-199, ng/mL | 1.54 | 0.214 | ||
< 37 | 60 (66.67) | 124 (59.05) | ||
≥ 37 | 30 (33.33) | 86 (40.95) | ||
Liver metastasis | 1.60 | 0.206 | ||
No | 63 (70.00) | 131 (62.38) | ||
Yes | 27 (30.00) | 79 (37.62) | ||
Peritoneal metastasis | 0.73 | 0.392 | ||
No | 75 (83.33) | 166 (62.38) | ||
Yes | 15 (16.67) | 79 (37.62) | ||
EBV status | 0.10 | 0.578 | ||
No-infect | 75 (83.33) | 178 (84.76) | ||
Infect | 15 (16.67) | 32 (15.24) | ||
PD-L1 expression | 0.60 | 0.440 | ||
CPS < 5 | 13 (14.44) | 38 (18.10) | ||
CPS ≥ 5 | 77 (85.56) | 172 (81.90) | ||
MMR status | 0.02 | 0.893 | ||
pMMR | 4 (4.44) | 7 (3.33) | ||
dMMR | 86 (95.56) | 203 (96.67) |
Table 6 Adverse events associated with sintilimab plus chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients, n (%)
Variables | Low TyG index (n = 164) | High TyG index (n = 136) | χ2 | P value |
All grades: Leukopenia | 71 (43.29) | 62 (45.59) | 0.26 | 0.607 |
All grades: Anemia | 68 (41.46) | 58 (42.65) | 0.00 | 0.989 |
All grades: Neutropenia | 63 (38.41) | 50 (36.75) | 0.09 | 0.769 |
All grades: Thrombocytopenia | 58 (35.37) | 47 (34.56) | 0.00 | 0.959 |
All grades: Nausea | 50 (30.49) | 38 (27.94) | 0.23 | 0.630 |
All grades: Pyrexia | 40 (24.39) | 36 (26.47) | 0.17 | 0.680 |
All grades: Elevated ALT | 34 (20.73) | 24 (17.65) | 0.45 | 0.501 |
All grades: Elevated AST | 34 (20.73) | 22 (16.18) | 1.02 | 0.313 |
All grades: Hypothyroidism | 32 (19.51) | 31 (22.79) | 0.48 | 0.487 |
All grades: Diarrhea | 29 (17.68) | 32 (23.52) | 1.57 | 0.210 |
All grades: Hypertension | 24 (14.63) | 19 (13.97) | 0.03 | 0.870 |
All grades: Pneumonitis | 20 (12.20) | 17 (12.50) | 0.02 | 0.898 |
All grades: Proteinuria | 18 (10.98) | 12 (8.82) | 0.38 | 0.536 |
All grades: Hyperbilirubinemia | 17 (10.37) | 12 (8.82) | 0.20 | 0.653 |
All grades: Fatigue | 16 (9.80) | 13 (10.29) | 0.00 | 0.954 |
≥ 3 grades: Thrombocytopenia | 30 (18.29) | 22 (16.18) | 0.23 | 0.630 |
≥ 3 grades: Neutropenia | 21 (12.80) | 14 (10.29) | 0.45 | 0.500 |
≥ 3 grades: Leukopenia | 19 (11.59) | 15 (11.03) | 0.02 | 0.880 |
≥ 3 grades: Anemia | 15 (9.15) | 10 (7.35) | 0.31 | 0.576 |
≥ 3 grades: Diarrhea | 8 (4.88) | 6 (4.41) | 0.04 | 0.849 |
≥ 3 grades: Nausea | 7 (4.27) | 5 (3.68) | 0.07 | 0.795 |
≥ 3 grades: Elevated ALT | 5 (3.05) | 4 (2.94) | 0.08 | 0.775 |
≥ 3 grades: Elevated AST | 4 (5.88) | 2 (1.47) | 0.03 | 0.855 |
≥ 3 grades: Hypothyroidism | 3 (1.83) | 4 (2.94) | 0.04 | 0.833 |
≥ 3 grades: Hypertension | 3 (1.83) | 2 (1.47) | 0.05 | 0.819 |
≥ 3 grades: Pneumonitis | 3 (1.83) | 2 (1.47) | 0.05 | 0.819 |
≥ 3 grades: Hyperbilirubinemia | 2 (1.22) | 2 (1.47) | 0.09 | 0.763 |
≥ 3 grades: Fatigue | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | - | - |
≥ 3 grades: Pyrexia | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | - | - |
≥ 3 grades: Proteinuria | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | - | - |
- Citation: Yao ZY, Ma X, Cui YZ, Liu J, Han ZX, Song J. Impact of triglyceride-glucose index on the long-term prognosis of advanced gastric cancer patients receiving immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(5): 102249
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i5/102249.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i5.102249