Editorial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2025; 31(3): 100393
Published online Jan 21, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i3.100393
Table 1 Red cell distribution width/platelet ratio in non-hepatic conditions
Ref.
Method
Findings
Conclusion
Acute conditions
Cetinkaya et al[43], 2014Totally 102 patients with AP were recruitedRPR with a cutoff value of 0.000067 presented an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.783 (95%CI: 0.688-0.878) and predicted the mortality of approximately 80% of the patientsRPR is a valuable biomarker of mortality in AP
Pusuroglu et al[44], 2015 Totally 470 consecutive patients with STEMI submitted for primary PCI were prospectively enrolledAt LRA, high RPR was an independent predictor of one-year cardiovascular mortality (P = 0.003, OR = 3.106, 95%CI: 1.456-6.623)RPR is an inexpensive and readily available biomarker which offers additional risk stratification in predicting long-term MACE and cardiovascular mortality in STEMI
Celık et al[42], 2015Totally 580 STEMI patients were divided into two groups according to thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grades after primary PCIAt LRA, RPR was among the independent predictors of no-reflow after primary PCI. In its turn, being in the no-reflow group compared to the reflow patients was associated with higher odds of in-hospital MACE, and cardiovascular mortalityRPR is among the independent predictors of no-reflow and in-hospital MACE among patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI
Karabulut and Arcagok[45], 2020 RPR was compared to C-reactive protein and procalcitonin to investigate the potential to predict EOS in newbornsRPR and other biomarkers had higher values in proven EOS than in the controlsRPR may be used in the diagnosis of EOS among newborns as a good alternative to other tools
Lehmann et al[46], 2021Totally 102 subjects with deep-seated ICH were includedAt LRA elevated RPR ≥ 0.06 was among the independent predictors of 90-day mortalityRPR, as a biomarker of inflammation, might serve for prognostic assessment in deep-seated ICH
Jiang et al[47], 2022Totally 47 individuals with MSA, 125 subjects with Parkinson’s disease, and 124 healthy controls were enrolledAt LRA, RPR was associated with the risk of MSAPatients with MSA probably have peripheral inflammatory reaction
Liu et al[48], 2022Totally 3367 patients with sepsis
were enrolled
After adjustment for confounders, high RPR was significantly associated with increased mortality both for categorical and continuous variables (adjusted HR = 1.210, 95%CI: 1.045–1.400; and adjusted HR = 2.826, 95%CI: 2.025–3.944, respectively)Elevated RPR values predict 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis
Wang et al[49], 2022 Totally 45 newborns were included in each of three groups of different severity; mild, moderate, and severe conditions based on SNAPE-IIA positive correlation was found between the SNAPE-II scores and RPR among newborns in NICUFurther to the SNAPE-II, also RPR can be used as a supplementary predictor biomarker for the assessment of neonatal morbidity and mortality in NICU
Liang et al[50], 2023 Retrospective cohort study of 2823 adults with ICHAfter adjustment for confounding factors, the 3rd tertile of RPR values, compared to the 1st tertile, was associated with increased odds of 30-day death in patients with ICH (HR = 1.37, 95%CI: 1.15–1.64)Among subjects with ICH, elevated RPR levels predict 30-day mortality
Kasirer et al[51], 2024Totally 69 infants with NEC and 78 controls were enrolled RPR was significantly associated with both NEC diagnosis (P < 0.0001) and mortality (P = 0.01). However, at LRA only variations of platelet count from birth to diagnosis remained significantThe often-elusive attempts to definitively diagnose NEC among preterm newborns may benefit from largely available, cheap, and easily calculated platelet indices
Chronic and acute-on chronic conditions
Özer Bekmez et al[52], 2018 A cohort of 112 infants with medically treated hsPDA and 96 controls were recruitedAt LRA analysis, high RPR (OR = 3.3, 95%CI: 1.438-5.872, P < 0.05) was one of the independent risk factors for hsPDARPR is a promising biomarker for the diagnosis of hsPDA
Bilgin et al[53], 2019Totally 312 CRC patients were enrolledAmong subjects with right-sided advanced cancer, OS was statistically significantly better for those with RPR ≥ 0.05 compared to those with RPR < 0.05 (median OS; RPR ≥ 0.05: 24.8 months vs < 0.05: 13.9 months; P = 0.035)After validation, RPR can be used as a prognostic marker in CRC
Dagistan and Cosgun[54], 2019Retrospective survey of 1342 subjects submitted to cranial MRIA statistically significant difference was found in RPR values among the various study groups (Fazekas 0 to Fazekas 3) (P < 0.001)Increased RPR values may suggest higher Fazekas's score and dementia in cranial MRI studies
Guler Kazanci et al[55], 2019Totally 481 infants were recruited (169 with hsPDA and 312 controls)RPR was significantly higher in the hsPDA group (P < 0.05). At LRA RPR > 0.070 (risk ratio = 5.33; 95%CI: 3.28-8.65; P < 0.001) was among the independent predictors of hsPDAHigh RPR values in the first hours of life are a risk factor for hsPDA (and hsPDA refractive to ibuprofen treatment) in preterm infants
Chen et al[56], 2023Totally 1922 AECOPD adults participating in the MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV; and 1738 AECOPD patients from Emergency Intensive Care Unit Collaborative Research Database were recruitedAfter adjusting for confounders, Log (RPR×1000) was associated with elevated risk of in-hospital mortality of AECOPD patients (OR = 1.36, 95%CI: 1.01–1.84)Among AECOPD patients RPR was associated with in-hospital mortality
Table 2 Red cell distribution width/platelet ratio in liver disease
Ref.
Method
Findings
Conclusion
Taefi et al[60], 2015Totally 152 subjects with native livers and 70 with transplanted livers were recruitedIn the native liver group RPR showed the strongest correlation with the degree of fibrosis (P < 0.001), AUC for cirrhosis = 0.684. However, in the transplanted liver group, none of the variables was significantly correlated with the stages of fibrosis nor did it predict cirrhosisWhile it can be a strong predictor of the stage of fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with CHB hepatitis and native liver, the use of RPR is limited among those with transplanted livers
Cengiz and Ozenirler[61], 2015Totally 123 consecutive individuals with biopsy-proven NAFLD were analyzedAUROC of the RPR was 0.69 in predicting significant fibrosis (≥ F2), 0.81 in advanced fibrosis (≥ F3), and 0.85 in F4, and all were statistically significant (P < 0.001). RPR was correlated with fibrosis (r = 0.37, 95%CI: 0.21-0.52, P < 0.001). At LRA, RPR independently predicted both significant and advanced fibrosis (P < 0.05)The finding that RPR predicted liver fibrosis may be useful to reduce liver biopsy burden in NAFLD
Koksal et al[62], 2016Totally 228 individuals with biopsy-proven CHB were enrolledStatistically significant increases in all scores, including RPR, and decrease in platelet count were observed as the fibrosis level increased. However, RPR (and platelet count) were best in demonstrating advanced fibrosisWhile they cannot replace liver biopsy for diagnosis, noninvasive scores such as APRI score can be used for monitoring the response to treatment with entecavir and tenefovir
Karagöz et al[63], 2016Totally 98 biopsy-proven treatment-naïve CHC patients were recruitedThe AUC of RPR (cut-off = 0.07 Fl) for predicting significant fibrosis was 0.705, which was superior to other non-invasive indices of fibrosis RPR values, being significantly higher in patients with CHC, and associated with the severity of fibrosis, can be used to predict advanced liver histology, thereby decreasing the need of liver biopsy
Huang et al[64], 2017Totally 256 CHB subjects were recruitedThe diagnostic performance of GPR was not significantly different from APRI, FIB-4, and RPR in identifying significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis, but it was significantly superior to area at risk and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in both HBeAg positive CHB and HBeAg negative CHBGPR does not show any advantages over APRI, FIB-4, and RPR in identifying significant liver fibrosis, advanced liver fibrosis, and liver cirrhosis among Chinese subjects with HBeAg positive CHB or HBeAg negative CHB
Ferdous et al[65], 2018Totally 40 subjects with CHB were enrolled RPR was positively correlated with stages of hepatic fibrosis (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.749, P < 0.001)Among CHB patients RPR values are strongly associated with stages of increasing severity of hepatic fibrosis
Liu et al[66], 2019Totally 123 individuals with CHB were enrolledThe AUC values for RPR for the diagnoses of substantial fibrosis, severe fibrosis, and cirrhosis were 0.692, 0.732, and 0.808, respectivelyAmong CHB patients two-dimensional shear wave elastography is significantly more accurate than other non-invasive indices, including RPR, in the diagnosis of substantial fibrosis, severe fibrosis, and cirrhosis (P < 0.05)
Milas et al[67], 2019Meta-analysis of 18 published studies totaling approximately 1800 patients for each outcomeSensitivity, specificity, and AUC were as follows: (1) Significant fibrosis: 0.635, 0.769, and 0.747; (2) Advanced fibrosis: 0.607, 0.783, and 0.773; and (3) Cirrhosis: 0.739, 0.768, and 0.818. Similar findings, in all outcomes, were registered for CHB. Subgroup analysis indicated a high specificity for advanced fibrosis detection in PBC. For patients with advanced fibrosis, studies outside of China showed a higher sensitivity than investigations performed in ChinaWith AUC > 0.7 for all outcomes and AUC > 0.8 for cirrhosis, RPR is a good biomarker of fibrosis, particularly among the most advanced forms of CLD
Jiang et al[68], 2020Totally 118 biopsy-proven PBC subjects were recruitedThe AUROC of RPR for predicting advanced fibrosis was 0.517The AUROC of the total bile acid to platelet ratio in diagnosing fibrosis among PBC subjects was higher than that of other non-invasive serological models, including RPR
Gozdas and Ince[69], 2020Totally 81 subjects with HCV chronic infection were enrolledRPR values of those with severe fibrosis were significantly higher than those of the mild fibrosis group (P < 0.05). However, MPV/P had the biggest AUROC in the prediction of advanced fibrosisMPV/P is an easy and practical biomarker to gain a preliminary insight into advanced fibrosis among subjects with chronic HCV infection
O’Hara et al[70], 2020Cross-sectional survey of 8099 individuals in South-Western UgandaIn this study, RPR scores were excluded from further statistical analysis given that only few individuals had an elevated scoreThis population-based cohort study did not have statistical power sufficient to detect any factors associated with abnormal RPR scores given that only few subjects had an elevated RPR score
Chen et al[71], 2020Retrospective analysis of 1005 CHB patients submitted to liver biopsies and laboratory profilingStepwise applying RPR, GPR, and easy liver fibrosis test would accurately discriminate 60% of patients as having either cirrhosis or no cirrhosisStepwise applying routine tests could be a strategy for cirrhosis detection in resource-limited settings
Ramzy et al[72], 2021Cross-sectional analysis of 197 Egyptians with CHCRPR values were significantly different among subjects with various fibrosis stages (P < 0.01) and RPR cut-off values of 0.007 and 0.008 were reliable predictors of significant and advanced fibrosis, respectively. However, at LRA, RPR was not an independent predictor of fibrosisWhile having fair sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy for predicting significant fibrosis in patients with CHC, RPR was not an independent predictor of fibrosis at LRA
Zhang et al[59], 2023Totally 168 HBVDC patients were enrolledAT LRA, RPR (together with MELD score) was an independent predictor of mortality at 30 days. RPR and MELD score had similar predictive value and the combination of the two indexes further improved their predictive value for mortalityRPR is a reliable biomarker for the prediction of mortality at 30 days among HBVDC subjects
Nawalerspanya et al[73], 2024Retrospective cross-sectional study of 139 individuals with biopsy-proven AIH or AIH-PBC overlap syndrome With an AUROC of 0.742, RPR distinguishes cirrhosis from non-cirrhosis stages of CLD better than FIB-4 and APRIIn distinguishing cirrhotic from non-cirrhotic CLD among individuals with either AIH or AIH-PBC, RPR is more accurate than other non-invasive biomarkers of fibrosis