Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2025; 31(22): 105201
Published online Jun 14, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i22.105201
Table 1 The controlling nutritional status
Parameter
Malnutritional status
Normal
Mild
Moderate
Severe
ALB (g/dL)3.5-4.53.0-3.492.5-2.9< 2.5
Score0246
Total lymphocytes (/mm3)≥ 16001200-1599800-1199< 800
Score0123
Cholesterol (mg/dL)≥ 180140-180100-139< 100
Score0123
Total0-12-45-89-12
Table 2 Comparison of the baseline characteristics of patients, n (%)
Item
Without complication
With complication
t/χ2
P value
Age68.23 ± 7.9469.12 ± 7.45-0.8920.419
Sex
    Male92 (65.2)15 (68.2)0.0730.788
    Female49 (34.8)7 (31.8)
BMI (kg/m2)25.87 ± 5.1929.14 ± 3.288.0910.000
Combined hypertension
    Yes34 (24.1)5 (22.7)0.0200.887
    No107 (75.9)17 (77.3)
Combined diabetes
    Yes21 (14.9)9 (42.9)9.4720.002
    No120 (85.1)12 (57.1)
Combined hyperlipidemia
    Yes16 (11.3)6 (27.3)4.1340.042
    No125 (88.7)16 (72.7)
ASA score
    I61 (43.3)3 (13.6)7.0040.008
    II80 (56.7)19 (86.4)
Primary tumor site
    Esophagogastric junction55 (39.0)9 (40.9)0.1230.940
    Proximal stomach49 (34.8)8 (36.4)
    Distal stomach37 (26.2)5 (22.7)
TNM stage
    I stage38 (27.0)5 (22.7)0.1750.676
    II stage103 (73.0)17 (77.3)
VFA105.28 ± 37.61151.98 ± 45.335.8720.000
SFA213.60 ± 57.18247.35 ± 79.352.5230.013
TFA318.88 ± 47.40399.33 ± 62.349.1080.000
VSR0.79 ± 0.411.07 ± 0.566.1290.000
Table 3 Relationship between postoperative complications and visceral fat area, n (%)
Item
Anastomotic lesions
Surgical incision infection or fat liquefaction
Lung infection
Abdominal infection
Intestinal obstruction
Other
With complication
VFA-L1 (0.9)2 (1.8)1 (0.9)1 (0.9)1 (0.9)2 (1.8)7 (6.4)
VFA-H4 (7.4)5 (9.3)2 (3.7)2 (3.7)1 (1.9)3 (5.6)15 (27.8)
χ25.1154.8431.5521.5520.2601.68114.106
P value0.0240.0280.2130.2130.6100.1950.000
Table 4 Analysis of postoperative related conditions and visceral fat area
Item
Operation time (minute)
Intraoperative blood loss (mL)
First exhaust time (day)
Postoperative hospital stay (day)
VFA-L224.31 ± 51.89127.93 ± 98.262.89 ± 1.1310.13 ± 4.75
VFA-H268.55 ± 63.41163.77 ± 105.273.02 ± 1.8811.28 ± 7.32
t6.0648.7192.9815.174
P value0.0000.0000.1090.552
Table 5 Analysis of serological indicators and visceral fat area
Item
ALB (g/L)
Hb (g/L)
CRP (mg/L)
TC (mmol/ L)
TG (mmol/L)
WBC (109/L)
VFA-L33.12 ± 4.67118.29 ± 39.616.14 ± 2.474.71 ± 1.241.99 ± 1.0113.89 ± 3.44
VFA-H28.53 ± 3.92115.99 ± 41.2313.58 ± 4.366.33 ± 2.352.78 ± 1.7616.73 ± 5.27
t-3.378-0.2764.4162.4342.1363.192
P value0.4520.7350.00070.0310.0450.057
Table 6 Risk factors of complication analyzed by binary logistic regression models
Item
B
SE
Wald
P value
OR
95%CI
Upper
Lower
BMI (kg/m2)0.8270.3665.6240.0191.9523.6241.183
Combined diabetes0.6880.3133.7050.0351.6723.1851.079
Combined hyperlipidemia0.4550.2411.5450.2171.5443.1030.844
ASA score0.0400.0194.6350.0311.0411.0801.004
VFA0.9510.3428.5310.0042.5974.8531.479
SFA-0.3410.1692.1210.1420.7731.0740.529
TFA0.8570.3066.1330.0131.6554.0401.076
VSR0.8680.3257.8790.0082.0465.6401.196