Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2025; 31(22): 105201
Published online Jun 14, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i22.105201
Published online Jun 14, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i22.105201
Table 1 The controlling nutritional status
Parameter | Malnutritional status | |||
Normal | Mild | Moderate | Severe | |
ALB (g/dL) | 3.5-4.5 | 3.0-3.49 | 2.5-2.9 | < 2.5 |
Score | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
Total lymphocytes (/mm3) | ≥ 1600 | 1200-1599 | 800-1199 | < 800 |
Score | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Cholesterol (mg/dL) | ≥ 180 | 140-180 | 100-139 | < 100 |
Score | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Total | 0-1 | 2-4 | 5-8 | 9-12 |
Table 2 Comparison of the baseline characteristics of patients, n (%)
Item | Without complication | With complication | t/χ2 | P value |
Age | 68.23 ± 7.94 | 69.12 ± 7.45 | -0.892 | 0.419 |
Sex | ||||
Male | 92 (65.2) | 15 (68.2) | 0.073 | 0.788 |
Female | 49 (34.8) | 7 (31.8) | ||
BMI (kg/m2) | 25.87 ± 5.19 | 29.14 ± 3.28 | 8.091 | 0.000 |
Combined hypertension | ||||
Yes | 34 (24.1) | 5 (22.7) | 0.020 | 0.887 |
No | 107 (75.9) | 17 (77.3) | ||
Combined diabetes | ||||
Yes | 21 (14.9) | 9 (42.9) | 9.472 | 0.002 |
No | 120 (85.1) | 12 (57.1) | ||
Combined hyperlipidemia | ||||
Yes | 16 (11.3) | 6 (27.3) | 4.134 | 0.042 |
No | 125 (88.7) | 16 (72.7) | ||
ASA score | ||||
I | 61 (43.3) | 3 (13.6) | 7.004 | 0.008 |
II | 80 (56.7) | 19 (86.4) | ||
Primary tumor site | ||||
Esophagogastric junction | 55 (39.0) | 9 (40.9) | 0.123 | 0.940 |
Proximal stomach | 49 (34.8) | 8 (36.4) | ||
Distal stomach | 37 (26.2) | 5 (22.7) | ||
TNM stage | ||||
I stage | 38 (27.0) | 5 (22.7) | 0.175 | 0.676 |
II stage | 103 (73.0) | 17 (77.3) | ||
VFA | 105.28 ± 37.61 | 151.98 ± 45.33 | 5.872 | 0.000 |
SFA | 213.60 ± 57.18 | 247.35 ± 79.35 | 2.523 | 0.013 |
TFA | 318.88 ± 47.40 | 399.33 ± 62.34 | 9.108 | 0.000 |
VSR | 0.79 ± 0.41 | 1.07 ± 0.56 | 6.129 | 0.000 |
Table 3 Relationship between postoperative complications and visceral fat area, n (%)
Item | Anastomotic lesions | Surgical incision infection or fat liquefaction | Lung infection | Abdominal infection | Intestinal obstruction | Other | With complication |
VFA-L | 1 (0.9) | 2 (1.8) | 1 (0.9) | 1 (0.9) | 1 (0.9) | 2 (1.8) | 7 (6.4) |
VFA-H | 4 (7.4) | 5 (9.3) | 2 (3.7) | 2 (3.7) | 1 (1.9) | 3 (5.6) | 15 (27.8) |
χ2 | 5.115 | 4.843 | 1.552 | 1.552 | 0.260 | 1.681 | 14.106 |
P value | 0.024 | 0.028 | 0.213 | 0.213 | 0.610 | 0.195 | 0.000 |
Table 4 Analysis of postoperative related conditions and visceral fat area
Item | Operation time (minute) | Intraoperative blood loss (mL) | First exhaust time (day) | Postoperative hospital stay (day) |
VFA-L | 224.31 ± 51.89 | 127.93 ± 98.26 | 2.89 ± 1.13 | 10.13 ± 4.75 |
VFA-H | 268.55 ± 63.41 | 163.77 ± 105.27 | 3.02 ± 1.88 | 11.28 ± 7.32 |
t | 6.064 | 8.719 | 2.981 | 5.174 |
P value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.109 | 0.552 |
Table 5 Analysis of serological indicators and visceral fat area
Item | ALB (g/L) | Hb (g/L) | CRP (mg/L) | TC (mmol/ L) | TG (mmol/L) | WBC (109/L) |
VFA-L | 33.12 ± 4.67 | 118.29 ± 39.61 | 6.14 ± 2.47 | 4.71 ± 1.24 | 1.99 ± 1.01 | 13.89 ± 3.44 |
VFA-H | 28.53 ± 3.92 | 115.99 ± 41.23 | 13.58 ± 4.36 | 6.33 ± 2.35 | 2.78 ± 1.76 | 16.73 ± 5.27 |
t | -3.378 | -0.276 | 4.416 | 2.434 | 2.136 | 3.192 |
P value | 0.452 | 0.735 | 0.0007 | 0.031 | 0.045 | 0.057 |
Table 6 Risk factors of complication analyzed by binary logistic regression models
Item | B | SE | Wald | P value | OR | 95%CI | |
Upper | Lower | ||||||
BMI (kg/m2) | 0.827 | 0.366 | 5.624 | 0.019 | 1.952 | 3.624 | 1.183 |
Combined diabetes | 0.688 | 0.313 | 3.705 | 0.035 | 1.672 | 3.185 | 1.079 |
Combined hyperlipidemia | 0.455 | 0.241 | 1.545 | 0.217 | 1.544 | 3.103 | 0.844 |
ASA score | 0.040 | 0.019 | 4.635 | 0.031 | 1.041 | 1.080 | 1.004 |
VFA | 0.951 | 0.342 | 8.531 | 0.004 | 2.597 | 4.853 | 1.479 |
SFA | -0.341 | 0.169 | 2.121 | 0.142 | 0.773 | 1.074 | 0.529 |
TFA | 0.857 | 0.306 | 6.133 | 0.013 | 1.655 | 4.040 | 1.076 |
VSR | 0.868 | 0.325 | 7.879 | 0.008 | 2.046 | 5.640 | 1.196 |
- Citation: Li WF, Que CR, Xu DB, Li P. Impact of visceral fat distribution on postoperative complications in high-aged patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery: A cross-sectional study. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(22): 105201
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i22/105201.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i22.105201