Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2025; 31(18): 104206
Published online May 14, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i18.104206
Table 1 Patient characteristics after propensity matching, n (%)

UC
CD
HCs
P value1
P value2
P value3
Number of subjects, n33027085---
Age, years, median (IQR)48 (33, 59)47 (31, 54)49 (41, 60)0.0840.0620.108
BMI, kg/m2, median (IQR)23.84 (19.61, 24.37)22.88 (18.40, 25.09)24.59 (22.26, 28.73)0.1320.0750.144
Gender
Male174 (52.7)156 (57.8)44 (51.8)0.4800.3270.129
Female156 (47.3)114 (42.2)41 (48.2)
Duration of illness, years, median (IQR)2 (0.6, 5)1 (0.3, 3)-
Endoscopic activity
Mild122 (37.0)137 (50.7)-
Moderate98 (29.7)108 (40.0)-
Severe110 (33.3)25 (9.3)-
Table 2 Multivariate logistic stepwise regression analysis of ulcerative colitis population

Standard error
Wald-value
OR (95%CI)
P value
CAR1.90059.7846381.71 (9.21-15827.23)0.0018
ESR0.026210.05501.09 (1.03-1.14)0.0015
PAR0.08967.22741.27 (1.07-1.52)0.0072
Table 3 Multivariate logistic stepwise regression analysis of Crohn’s disease population

Standard error
Wald-value
OR (95%CI)
P value
AGR0.489439.66100.05 (0.02-0.12)< 0.001
CAR0.21616.36131.72 (1.13-2.63)0.0117
Table 4 Baseline comparison between endoscopic response group and no-response group in ulcerative colitis group

Endoscopic response group
Endoscopic no-response group
P value
CRP12.77 (3.77, 43.39)4.47 (1.82, 9.39)0.037
CLR6.69(2.56, 27.64)2.29 (0.63, 4.13)0.019
CAR0.30(0.13, 0.86)0.11 (0.03, 0.27)0.031
Table 5 Baseline comparison between endoscopic response group and no-response group in Crohn’s disease group

Endoscopic response group
Endoscopic no-response group
P value
CRP22.94 (4.20, 41.00)14.57 (6.45, 64.81)0.003
CAR0.67 (0.09, 1.10)0.37 (0.16, 1.88)0.026
CLR20.85 (2.63, 27.04)8.56 (4.08, 42.85)< 0.001