Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 7, 2025; 31(13): 104466
Published online Apr 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i13.104466
Published online Apr 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i13.104466
Table 1 Comparison of the predictive performance of the xTRM-W staging system and the 8th edition tumor node metastasis staging system
Group | Classification | Likelihood ratio χ2 | C-index | AIC value |
Training set | xTRM-W | 668.580 | 0.742 | 12323.976 |
pTNM | 479.560 | 0.714 | 12512.994 | |
Validation set | xTRM-W | 324.290 | 0.666 | 12489.603 |
pTNM | 275.700 | 0.655 | 12538.197 |
Table 2 Comparison of the predictive performance of the xTRM-P staging system and the 8th edition tumor node metastasis staging system
Group | Classification | Likelihood ratio χ2 | C-index | AIC value |
Training set | xTRM-P | 732.740 | 0.723 | 15938.971 |
pTNM | 559.260 | 0.704 | 16112.451 | |
Validation set | xTRM-P | 989.680 | 0.680 | 34678.546 |
pTNM | 893.260 | 0.680 | 34774.967 |
- Citation: Zhang YL, Song HB, Xue YW. Machine learning-based reconstruction of prognostic staging for gastric cancer patients with different differentiation grades: A multicenter retrospective study. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(13): 104466
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i13/104466.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i13.104466