Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2024; 30(42): 4569-4575
Published online Nov 14, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i42.4569
Published online Nov 14, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i42.4569
Indications | Specific situations |
Disabling rectal bleeding[10] | |
Surgical contraindications[16] | Abnormal coagulation function anticoagulants, various acquired or genetic coagulation disorders (cirrhosis, protein S deficiency, haemophilia, etc.)[8,11,23] |
Previous unsuccessful surgery[8,16] | |
Poor cardiopulmonary function[34] | |
No history of surgery[8,10] | |
Vascular abnormalities | Rectal arteriovenous malformation[12] |
Both hemorrhoidal disease and portal hypertension with rectal varices[35] | |
No severe prolapse[8] | |
Wishes of younger active patients[8], immunosuppressed patients[36] | |
Pathological condition[15] | Morbid obesity, paraplegia |
Embolic materials | Advantages | Disadvantages |
Microcoils | Easy to identify under fluoroscopy[37] | Dependent on a normal coagulation status[38] |
Mild adverse reactions[29] | A non-distal embolization[8] | |
Slow symptom relief[22] | ||
Particles | Occluding the distal branches[22] | Particulate reflux[38] |
Higher clinical success rates[23] | An increased risk of local ischemic complications[23] | |
Liquid embolic materials | A high hemostasis effect with a low recurrent bleeding rate[38] | Vascular glue penetration can be difficult to control[38] |
Unwanted retrograde flow or reflux[39] | ||
Possibility of ischemic complications[26] |
- Citation: Lei ML, Dong LL, Zhang HP, Yu YB. Does hemorrhoidal artery embolization really benefit patients with hemorrhoids? World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30(42): 4569-4575
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v30/i42/4569.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v30.i42.4569