Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 21, 2024; 30(31): 3680-3688
Published online Aug 21, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i31.3680
Published online Aug 21, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i31.3680
Table 1 Endoscopic working channel cleanliness scale
Working channel findings | Endoscope inspection ratings |
Dark colored debris | 0 (none): No dark colored debris |
1 (mild): Small dark particles or linear debris in up to 3 locations | |
2 (moderate): Small dark particles or debris in > 3 locations or larger debris in 1 location | |
3 (severe): Larger dark particles or debris in > 1 location | |
Light colored debris | 0 (none): No light colored/reflective debris |
1 (mild): Small light-colored/reflective particles or residue in up to 3 locations | |
2 (moderate): Small light-colored/reflective particles or residue in > 3 locations, or larger debris/residue in 1 | |
3 (severe): Larger light-colored/reflective particles or debris in > 1 location or present in continuous large | |
Opaque fluid | 0 (none): No opaque fluid |
1 (mild): Up to 5 individual drops of opaque fluid within channel | |
2 (moderate): 6 to 10 individual drops of opaque fluid within channel | |
3 (severe): Greater than 10 individual drops of opaque fluid or pooling of fluid within channel | |
Clear fluid | 0 (none): No clear fluid |
1 (mild): Up to 5 individual drops of clear fluid within channel | |
2 (moderate): 6 to 10 individual drops of clear fluid within channel | |
3 (severe): Greater than 10 individual drops of clear fluid or pooling of fluid within channel |
Table 2 Teflon tube damage scale
Damage | Endoscope inspection ratings |
Scratch characteristics | 0 (none): No scratches visualized |
1 (mild): Superficial, with regular margins, < 1 image field in length | |
2 (moderate): Deeper, with irregular margins or > 1 image field in length | |
3 (severe): Deep with irregular margins | |
Scratch severity | 0 (none): No scratches visualized |
1 (mild): < 10 scratches visualized | |
2 (moderate): 10-20 scratches visualized | |
3 (severe): > 20 scratches visualized | |
Adherent peel | 0 (none): No adherent peel visualized |
1 (mild): Localized to 1 small (< 1 cm) site | |
2 (moderate): Present in 2–3 locations or 1-2 cm site | |
3 (severe): Present in > 3 locations or single > 2 cm site |
Table 3 Comparison of details of cleanliness scores of endoscopic working channels, n (%)
Working channel findings | Control group (n = 30) | Experimental group (n = 30) | χ2 | P value |
Dark colored debris | 4 (13.3) | 2 (6.7) | 0.74 | 0.671 |
Light colored debris | 20 (66.7) | 13 (43.3) | 3.30 | 0.069 |
Residual debris | 22 (73.3) | 14 (46.7) | 4.44 | 0.035 |
Opaque fluid | 2 (6.7) | 3 (10.0) | 0.22 | 1.00 |
Clear fluid | 14 (46.7) | 18 (60.0) | 1.07 | 0.438 |
Table 4 Comparison of damage scoring details for Teflon tubes
Working channel findings | Control group (n = 30) | Experimental group (n = 30) | Z | P value |
Scratch characteristics | 1 (1, 2) | 1 (1, 2) | -1.473 | 0.141 |
Scratch severity | 1 (1, 2) | 1 (1, 1) | -1.629 | 0.103 |
Adherent peel | 1.5 (1, 2) | 1 (1, 2) | -1.777 | 0.076 |
- Citation: Du J, Zhang M, Tao SY, Ye LS, Gong H, Hu B, Zhang QY, Qiao F. Efficacy of spray flushing in the reprocessing of flexible endoscopes: A randomized controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30(31): 3680-3688
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v30/i31/3680.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v30.i31.3680