Copyright
©The Author(s) 1997.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 15, 1997; 3(2): 93-94
Published online Jun 15, 1997. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v3.i2.93
Published online Jun 15, 1997. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v3.i2.93
Table 1 Ames test on salted pork
Samples | Mutagenicity (rev/g TA98) | |
-Sg | +Sg | |
Salted pork | ||
-NaNO2 | 8640 | 13000 |
+NaNO2 | 8810 | 14900 |
Table 2 Micronuclei test of salted pork-induced V79 cells
Samples | -Sg | +Sg | ||
MNR | MNCR | MNR | MNCR | |
Extract of salted pork (0 mL/L) | 13 | 12 | 9.0 | 8.0 |
Extract of salted pork (20 mL/L) | 19 | 17 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Extract of salted pork (40 mL/L) | 19 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.5 |
Extract of salted pork (80 mL/L) | 27 | 20 | 6.0 | 5.0 |
Methyl nitrate nitrosoguanidine (5 mg/L) | 96 | 86 | ||
Aflatoxin B1 (0.01 mg/L) | 19.0 | 18.0 |
- Citation: Yuan Y, Lin HZ, Zhang YC, Wang XJ, Wu YQ, Gao H, Wang L, Liu YH, Lu F, Lou SQ. Pathogenetic effects of salted pork in an area of China with high-risk for stomach cancer. World J Gastroenterol 1997; 3(2): 93-94
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v3/i2/93.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v3.i2.93