Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28, 2023; 29(8): 1374-1394
Published online Feb 28, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i8.1374
Table 1 Description of study design and study population
Ref.
Design
CP patients
CP severity, n (%)
CP etiology, n (%)
Study population
Race
Female patients, n (%)
Age, mean ± SD
BMI, mean ± SD
Morán et al[17], 1997Cross sectionalClinicoradiological All severeAlcohol: 10 (71.4)CP: 14CP: 0CP: 561 (-)CP: 22.64
Idiopathic 4 (28.6)Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Haaber et al[18], 2000Cross sectionalClinicoradiologicalAlcohol: 46 (79)CP: 58CP: -CP: 26 (44.8)CP: 53 (9)CP: 23 (5)
Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Dujsikova et al[19], 2008Cross sectionalEUS based criteria Wiersema classification: Mild: 41 (56.2), moderate: 12 (16.4), severe: 20 (27.4)CP: 73CP: -CP:17 (23.28)CP: 46.61 (13.23)CP: -
Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Tignor et al[20], 2010Retrospective cohortICD-9 code 577.1CP: 3192CP: White: 2091 (65.5), black: 419 (13.1), hispanic: 222 (6.9), others: 532 (16.7)CP: 1636 (51.25)CP: -CP: -
Controls: 1436699Control: White: 860190 (59.9), black: 115199 (8.0), hispanic: 102000, other: 451110Controls: 907328 (63.15)Controls: -Controls: -
Sudeep et al[22], 2011Cross sectionalNot definedTropical pancreatitis: 20 (65)CP: 31CP: -CP: 0CP: 35.8 (9)CP: 18.46 (2.86)
Idiopathic: 11 (35)Controls: 35Controls: -Controls: 0Controls: 38.6 (5.2)Controls: 22.6 (3.1)
Joshi et al[21], 2011Cross sectionalClinicoradiologicalAll patients with tropical calcific pancreatitisCP: 72CP: -CP: 34 (47.2)CP: 31.1 (10.3)CP: 19 (3.1)
Controls: 100Controls: -Controls: 50 (50)Controls: 32.6 (9.6)Controls: 23.6 (3.2)
Duggan et al[23], 2012Cross sectionalClinicoradiologicalCambridge classification: Mild (37.1), severe (27.4)Alcohol: 24 (38.7)CP: 62CP: -CP: 17 (27.41)CP: 47.9 (12.5)CP: 25.6 (5)
Idiopathic: 38 (61.3)Controls: 66Controls: -Controls: 18 (27.27)Controls: 47.74 (11)Controls: 28.0 (4.1)
Sikkens et al[25], 2013Prospective cohortClinicoradiologicalAlcohol: 20 (50)CP: 40CP: -CP: 17 (42.5)CP: 52 (11)CP: 24 (5)
Idiopathic: 17 (43)Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Other: 3 (7)
Prabhakaran et al[28], 2014Cross sectionalClinicoradiological.Cambridge classification: Mild (13.1), moderate (5.05), marked: (81.8)Alcohol: 72 (70) CP: 103CP: -CP: 0CP: 38.6 (20.64)CP: 19.7
Idiopathic: 31 (29.1)Controls: -Controls: -Controls: 0Controls: 36.7 (20.70)Controls: -
Bang et al[26], 2014Prospective cohortICD-10: K86.0 (alcohol induced CP), K86.1 (other CP)CP: 11972CP: -CP: 4011 (33.5)CP: 54.5 (14)CP: -
Controls: 119720Controls: -Controls: 40106 (33.49)Controls: 54.5 (14)Controls: -
Duggan et al[27], 2015Cross sectionalClinicoradiologicalCambridge classification (unspecified number in each category)Alcohol: 18 (62.1)CP: 29CP: -CP: 12 (41.37)CP: 44.3 (12.3)CP: 25.2 (5.1)
Idiopathic: 8 (27.6)Controls: 29Controls: -Controls: 12 (41.37)Controls: 45.8 (9.8)Controls: 27.3 (3.7)
Other: 3 (10.3)
Munigala et al[24], 2016Cross sectionalICD-9 code 577.1CP: 3257CP: White 2120 (65), black 1012 (31), others 125 (4) CP: 178 (5.46)CP: 54.2 (11.1)CP: -
Controls: 450655Controls: White: 325132 (72), black: 76031 (17), others: 49492 (11)Controls: 53108 (11.78)Controls: 53.6 (13.9)Controls: -
Kumar et al[29], 2017Cross sectionalClinicoradiologicalCP: 102CP: -CP: 17 (16.7)CP: 40.8 (12.6)CP: 22.5 (3.2)
Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Stigliano et al[32], 2018Cross sectionalM-ANNHEIM criteria M-ANNHEIM scoring system: Minor: 74 (35), Increased: 99 (47), advanced: 32 (15), marked: 6 (3)Alcoholic: 91 (43)CP: 211CP: -CP: 69 (32.7) CP: 60 (-)CP: 24 (4)
Idiopathic: 40 (19)Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Hereditary: 8 (4)
Obstructive: 12 (5.7)
Kuhlmann et al[30], 2018Cross sectionalScore ≥ 4 points based on Lüneburg criteriaCP: 67CP: -CP: 27 (40.29)CP: 601 (-)CP: 22.7 (15-37.9)
Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Min et al[31], 2018Prospective cohortEUS criteria and/orEUS criteria (unspecified number in each category)Toxic/metabolic: 54 (59.3)CP: 91CP: -CP: 34 (37.36)CP: 48.6 (10.4)CP: 26.1 (7.8)
secretin stimulation testingIdiopathic: 17 (18.6)Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Hereditary: 13 (14.3)
Autoimmune: 5 (5.5)
Gupta et al[33], 2019Prospective cohortClinicoradiological and EUSCP: 38CP: White 35 (92), black 3 (8)CP: 19 (50)CP: 44 (10.7)CP: 26.7 (5.9)
Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Kanakis et al[7], 2020Retrospective cohortClinicoradiologicalCP: 239CP: White 43 (88), minorities: 6 (12)CP: 37 (15.48)CP: 561 (-)CP: 23 (8)
Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Hart et al[34], 2021Cross sectionalClinicoradiologicalCambridge classification (unspecified number in each category)-CP: 282CP: White race (87.2), minorities (12.8)CP: 145 (51.41)CP: 561 (-)CP: -
Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Vujasinovic et al[8], 2021Retrospective cohort2002 Asia-Pacifc consensus reportAlcohol and smoking: 40 (33.9)CP: 118CP: -CP: 49 (41.52)CP: 53.1 (16.3)CP: 23.9 (4.4)
Smoking only: 12 (11)Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Alcohol only: 7 (5.9)
Hereditary: 21 (11.8)
Immunological: 23 (14.4)
Efferent duct factors: 11 (9.3)
Tang et al[35], 2021Cross sectionalICD-9 based codesM-ANNHEIM clinical stage 0: 6 (5.8), I: 59 (56.7), II: 26 (25.0), III: 8 (7.7), IV: 5 (4.8)CP: 104CP: -CP: 31 (29.8)CP: 46.08 (14.43)CP: 21.43 (2.85)
Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Table 2 Characteristics of study outcomes, n (%)
Ref.
Population
Outcome definition
Osteoporosis
Osteopenia
Pathologic fracture
Morán et al[17], 1997CP: 14T score < -2.5 CP: 3 (21.4)CP: 10 (71.4)CP: -
Controls: -T score -1 to -2.5 Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Unavailable
Haaber et al[18], 2000CP: 58Z score < -2 CP: 13 (22.4)CP: 36 (62)CP: -
Controls: -Z score < -1.0Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Unavailable
Dujsikova et al[19], 2008CP: 73T score < -2.5 CP: 4 (5.5)CP: 19 (26)CP: 1 (1.3)
Controls: -T score -1 to -2.5 Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Undefined
Tignor et al[20], 2010CP: 3192Not studiedCP: -CP: -CP: 154 (4.8)
Controls: 1436699Not studiedControls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Vertebral, hip, and wrist fractures using ICD-9 codes
Sudeep et al[22], 2011CP: 31T score < -2.5 CP: 9 (29)CP: -CP: -
Controls: 35T score -1 to -2.5 Controls: 3 (8.5)Controls: -Controls: -
Unavailable
Joshi et al[21], 2011CP: 72Z score < -2 CP: 22 (30.5)CP: -CP: 0
Controls: 100UnavailableControls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Undefined
Duggan et al[23], 2012CP: 62T score < -2.5 CP: 18 (33)CP: 21 (39.6)CP: -
Controls: 66T score -1 to -2.5 Controls: 6 (10.1)Controls: 20 (33.8)Controls: -
Unavailable
Sikkens et al[25], 2013CP: 40T score < -2.5 CP: 4 (10)CP: 18 (45)CP: -
Controls: -T score -1 to -2.5 Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Unavailable
Prabhakaran et al[28], 2014CP: 103T score < -2.5 CP: 25 (30.1)CP: 38 (45.7)CP: -
Controls: -T score -1 to -2.5 Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Unavailable
Bang et al[26], 2014CP: 11972M80.0-M81.9 based on ICD-10 codeCP: 898 (7.5)CP: -CP: 1055 (8.8)
Controls: 119720UnavailableControls: 4070 (3.3)Controls: -Controls: 8485 (7)
Spine, humerus, distal forearm, and proximal femur based on ICD-10 codes
Duggan et al[27], 2015CP: 29T score < -2.5 CP: 9 (31)CP: 13 (44.8)CP: -
Controls: 29T score -1 to -2.5 Controls: 2 (6.8)Controls: 15 (51.7)Controls: -
Unavailable
Munigala et al[24], 2016CP: 3257Unspecified ICD-9 codesCP: -CP: -CP: 153 (4.6)
Controls: 450655UnavailableControls: -Controls: -Controls: 9325 (2)
ICD-9 codes: vertebral (805.2, 805.3, 805.4,805.5, 805.6, 805.7), hip (820.0, 820.1, 820.2, 820.3, 820.8, 820.9), or wrist fractures (814.0, 814.1, 813.4, 813.5)
Kumar et al[29], 2017CP: 102Z score < -2 CP: 6 (5.8)CP: 21 (20.5)CP: -
Controls: -UnavailableControls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Unavailable
Stigliano et al[32], 2018CP: 211T score < -2.5 CP: 46 (21.8)CP: 89 (42.1)CP: 13 (6.1)
Controls: -T score: -1 to -2.5 Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Occurring at the spine, hip and distal radius, and not associated with traumatic events
Kuhlmann et al[30], 2018CP: 67T score < -2.5 CP: 18 (26.8)CP: 34 (50.7)CP: -
Controls: -T score: -1 to -2.5 Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Unavailable
Min et al[31], 2018CP: 91T score < -2.5 CP: 10 (22.2)CP: 21 (46.6)CP: -
Controls: -T score: -1 to -2.5 Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Unavailable
Gupta et al[33], 2019CP: 38T score < -2.5 CP: 21 (55.2)CP: -CP: -
Controls: -T score: -1 to -2.5 Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
A fall from standing height or less that resulted in a fracture
Kanakis et al[7], 2020CP: 239T score < -2.5 or history of fragility fractureCP: 15 (30.6)CP: 27 (55.1)CP: 22 (9)
Controls: -T score: -1 to -2.5 Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Hip or vertebral fracture not due to excess trauma
Hart et al[34], 2021CP: 282T score < -2.5 CP: 48 (17)CP: 110 (39)CP: 6 (2.1)
Controls: -T score: -1 to -2.5 Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Spontaneous fractures
Vujasinovic et al[8], 2021CP: 118T score < -2.5 CP: 30 (25.4)CP: 33 (27.9)CP: 33 (27.9)
Controls: -T score: -1 to -2.5 Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Unavailable
Tang et al[35], 2021CP: 104T score < -2.5 CP: 6 (5.7)CP: 32 (30.7)CP: -
Controls: -T score: -1 to -2.5 Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Occurring in the hip, spine, or wrist
Table 3 Characteristics of various covariates and their association with outcome measures
Ref.
PERT use, n (%)
Inflammatory markers: CRP/IL-6, mean ± SD
Vitamin D deficiency, n (%)
Serum PTH, mean ± SD
Alcohol exposure, n (%)
Smokers, n (%)
Diabetes, n (%)
Nutritional parameters
Relevant covariates findings
Morán et al[17], 1997CP: 4 (28.57)CP: -CP: 7 (50)CP: -CP: 0CP: -CP: -Mean serum albumin 3.8 g/dL, 4 (28.6) had BMI < 20. Non-significant associations between osteopathy and BMINon-significant associations between osteopathy and (1) CP severity (as per fecal fat or bicarbonate secretion assessments); (2) CP etiology; (3) Age; and (4) Vitamin D, PTH or calcium
Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Haaber et al[18], 2000CP: 26 (44.82)CP: -CP: -CP: 401 (31)CP: -CP: -CP: -Non-significant associations between osteopathy and (1) Duration of CP; and (2) Vitamin D and PTH
Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Dujsikova et al[19], 2008CP: -CP: -CP: 63 (86.3)CP: -CP: 8 (10.95)CP: -CP: -Non-significant associations between osteopathy and severity of disease
Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Tignor et al[20], 2010CP: -CP: -CP: -CP: -CP: -CP: -CP: -No descriptions of regression analysis or covariate adjustment
Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Sudeep et al[22], 2011CP: -CP: -CP: 16 (51.6)CP: -CP: -CP: -CP: -BMI correlated significantly with BMC (r = 0.426; P = 0.017). There was an inverse correlation between stool fat and BMC (r = -0.47; P = 0.03)Non-significant associations between osteopathy and (1) EPI (as per 72-hour fecal fat); and (2) Vitamin D
Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Joshi et al[21], 2011CP: 33 (45.83)CP: CRP < 0.32 (-)CP: 62 (86.11)CP: 43.381 (-)CP: -CP: 7 (9.7)CP: 52 (72.2)Lumbar Z score was associated with BMI (beta: 0.276; P = 0.04), serum albumin was significantly lower in patients compared with controls [4.0 (0.6) vs 4.6 (0.7) g/dL, P < 0.001]
Controls: -Controls: CRP < 0.32 (-)Controls: 85 (85)Controls: 84.871 (-)Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Significant association of Lumbar Z score with log vitamin D (beta: 0.274; P = 0.04)
Duggan et al[23], 2012CP: -CP: -CP: -CP: -CP: 58 (93.5)CP: 46 (74.19)CP: -BMI < 20: low BMD: 15 (23.8) vs normal BMD 10 (1.1)Higher T scores for the lowest age tertile (P = 0.003). Lower T-score for smokers (P = 0.002). Non-significant associations between T scores at any area and (1) CP severity; (2) EPI; and (3) Ssex
Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: 62 (93.9)Controls: 40 (60.6)Controls: -
Sikkens et al[25], 2013CP: 19 (47.5)CP: -CP: -CP: -CP: 1 (2.5)CP: 27 (67.5)CP: -A high BMI is predictive of a ‘‘higher’’ lowest T-score [Coeff: 0.58 (0.2); P = 0.003]Significant association between osteopathy and untreated EPI (P = 0.013)
Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Prabhakaran et al[28], 2014CP: -CP: -CP: 20 (19.41)CP: 27.6 (39.8)CP: 72 (69.9)CP: -CP: 39 (37.86)-Non-significant associations between osteopathy and (1) EPI (as per steatorrhea assessment); (2) CP severity; and (3) CP etiology
Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Non-significant associations between osteopathy and vitamin D, PTH and alkaline phosphatase
Bang et al[26], 2014CP: 3545 (29.61)CP: -CP: -CP: -CP: 3651 (30.49)CP: -CP: -Increased risk of fracture among smokers (HR, 1.8; 95%CI, 1.7-1.8) and alcohol related CP (HR, 2.0 vs 1.5; P < 0.0001)
Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: 2753 (2.29)Controls: -Controls: -
Reduced fracture risk among PERT treated CP patients (HR, 0.8; 95%CI, 0.7-0.9)
Duggan et al[27], 2015CP: -CP: CRP: 3.15 (-), IL-6: 5.61 (-)CP: 20CP: 47.1 (19.4) CP: 27 (93.10)CP: 23 (79.3)CP: -Lower T scores were associated with BMI (P = 0.04)Lower T scores were associated with age (P = 0.006). Non-significant association with carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen; osteocalcin; Procollagen 1 amino-terminal propeptide
Controls: -Controls: CRP: 0.9 (-), IL-6: 3.58 (1.82)Controls: 18Controls: 46.3 (14)Controls: 28 (96.55)Controls: 10 (34.4)Controls: -
Non-significant association with IL-6 and CRPLower T scores were associated with serum vitamin D (P = 0.002). No association with PTH
Munigala et al[24], 2016CP: -CP: -CP: -CP: -CP: 494 (15.16)CP: 505 (15.5)CP: -A significant association of BMD in the columnar spine with vitamin D level (coefficient 0.13 g/cm2; P = 0.017) and BMI (coefficient 0.14 g/cm2; P = 0.007) were observed on univariate analysisIncreased fracture risk among males (adjusted OR, 1.73% (95%CI: 1.46%-2.05%); P < 0.0001), alcohol consumers (OR, 2.30), and smokers (OR, 1.97). Non-significant associations between osteopathy and age
Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: 37146 (8.24)Controls: 77926 (17.29)Controls: -
Kumar et al[29], 2017CP: -CP: -CP: 69 (67.64)CP: -CP: -CP: -CP: 54 (52.94)A MUST score (malnutrition score) of 1 or higher was associated with an increased risk for osteopenia and osteoporosis on Fisher’s exact test (P = 0.0037)Non-significant association between osteopathy and duration of CP
Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Non-significant association between osteopathy and vitamin D
Stigliano et al[32], 2018CP: 116 (54.97)CP: -CP: 119 (56.39)CP: -CP: 127 (60.18)CP: 145 (68.72)CP: 77 (36.49)Observed significant association of BMI with osteopathy (OR 0.89; 95%CI: 0.83-0.96; P = 0.003) Osteopathy more prevalent with increasing age (OR 1.06; P = 0.0002), female sex (OR: 3.44; P = 0.0005). Non-significant association between osteopathy and (1) CP severity; (2) EPI (as assessed by fecal elastase); (3) Smoking; (4) Duration of CP; and (5) Alcohol exposure
Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Non-significant association between osteopathy and PERT usageNon-significant association between osteopathy and IL-6/CRPNon-significant association between osteopathy, vitamin D and PTH
Kuhlmann et al[30], 2018CP: 28 (41.79)CP: -CP: -CP: -CP: 42 (62.68)CP: 42 (62.68)CP: 22 (32.83)The underweight BMI category, had significant higher odds of osteopathy (OR: 7.40; 95%CI: 1.56-34.99; P < 0.001)Lower Z scores associated with (1) EPI (P = 0.01); (2) Smoking (P = 0.02). Non-significant association with alcohol exposure
Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Lower Z scores associated with vitamin D (P = < 0.001)
Min et al[31], 2018CP: -CP: -CP: -CP: -CP: -CP: -CP: -Non-significant association with BMINon-significant association with (1) CP severity; (2) PERT usage
Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Gupta et al[33], 2019CP: -CP: -CP: -CP: -CP: 13 (34.21)CP: 18 (47.36)CP: 12 (31.57)Low bone mass was associated with lower BMI. Non-significant association with CP duration
Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Kanakis et al[7], 2020CP: -CP: -CP: -CP: -CP: 130 (54.39)CP: 132 (55.23)CP: -For patients, there was no association between total hip BMD and BMI (P = 0.753)No descriptions of regression analysis or covariate adjustment
Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Hart et al[34], 2021CP: 161 (57.09)CP: -CP: -CP: -CP: -CP: 191 (67.7)CP: 111 (39.36)Higher osteopathy risk associated with low BMI (P ≤ 0.001)Increased risk of osteopathy with white race (P = 0.017), age (P ≤ 0.001), female sex (P ≤ 0.01) and past or present smoking (P ≤ 0.01). No associations with (1) CP severity (per atrophy assessment); and (2) Duration of CP
Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Reduced osteopathy among PERT users (P = 0.02)
Vujasinovic et al[8], 2021CP: 104 (88.13)CP: -CP: -CP: -CP: 53 (44.91)CP: 76 (64.4)CP: 28 (23.72)
Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Reduced time to first fracture in PERT-treated patients
Tang et al[35], 2021CP: 51CP: CRP: 0.75 (-), IL-6: 4.51 (-)CP: 76 (73.07)CP: 40.86 (-)CP: 52 (50)CP: 45 (43.26)CP: 28 (26.92)Independent predictors of osteopathy: BMI (OR, 0.72; 95%CI, 0.58-0.89; P = 0.003)Non-significant association between osteopathy and (1) Age; and (2) Duration of CP
Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -Controls: -
Non-significant association between osteopathy and IL-6/CRPNon-significant association between osteopathy and PTH
Table 4 Metaregression of outcome measures with various covariates
CovariatesOsteopenia
Osteoporosis
Fragility fracture
95%CI
P value
95%CI
P value
95%CI
P value
Sex distribution0.2 (-1.2-1.5)P = 0.80.5 (-1.9-2.9)P = 0.70.3 (-3.2-3.7)P = 0.9
Age0.0 (0-1)P = 0.60.0 (-0.1-0.0)P = 0.30.0 (-0.5-0.4)P = 0.7
DM0.3 (-5.5-6.0)P = 0.90.0 (-3.9-3.8)P = 0.9-13.8 (-107.4-79.8)P = 0.3
Alcohol use0.0 (-1.5-1.3)P = 0.10.8 (-8.5-10.0)P = 0.7-0.5 (-5.4-4.4)P = 0.3
Vitamin D 0.0 (-0.02-0.0012)P = 0.4-0.002 (-0.004-0.001)P = 0.20.0 (-0.003-0.005)P = 0.5
PTH levels0.002 (-0.02-0.02)P = 0.50.0 (-0.02-0.03)P = 0.4--
PERT1.7 (0.6 -2.8)P = 0.21.7 (0.6-2.8)P < 0.00011.0 (-4.3-6.2)P = 0.5
Smoking0.0 (-3.6-3.6)P = 0.9-0.5 (-2.9-1.9)P = 0.62.0 (-3.4-7.9)P = 0.3
Mean BMINAP = 0.90.0 (-0.12-0.21)P = 0.60.5 (-17.2-18.2)P = 0.8