Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 21, 2023; 29(31): 4797-4808
Published online Aug 21, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i31.4797
Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies
Ref.
Country
Design
Diagnosis
Patient number
Mean age (yr)
Male (%)
CP class C (%)
Methods for copeptin measuring
Copeptin analysis
Median follow-up duration (mo)
Variables adjusted
Moreno et al[23], 2013FrancePCCirrhosis (alcohol 84.2%)125586933.7Kryptor immunoassay13 pmol/L, T3:T1-211Age, sex, CP Class, and CRP
Kerbert et al[24], 2015The NetherlandsRCCirrhosis (alcohol 34.4%, viral 18%)615475.431.1Kryptor immunoassay21.9 pmol/L, ROC analysis12Age, sex, and MELD score
Sola 2016-originalSpainPCCirrhosis (alcohol 43%, HCV 34%)2656066NRKryptor immunoassay14 pmol/L, median3Age, sex, MELD score, and leukocyte count
Sola 2016-validationMultiple European countriesRCCirrhosis (alcohol 51%, HCV 19%)1205772NRKryptor immunoassay19 pmol/L, median3Age, sex, and MELD score
Kerbert et al[25], 2016The Netherlands and FrancePCCirrhosis (alcohol 70.1%, viral 11.4%)18455.770.721.2Kryptor immunoassay12.3 pmol/L, ROC analysis12Age, sex, CP class, and CRP
Kerbert et al[27], 2017Multiple European countriesRCAcute decompensated cirrhosis (alcohol 61%, HCV 31.9%, and HBV 5.7%)7795865.7NRKryptor immunoassay13.6 pmol/L, ROC analysis3Age, sex, WBC, sodium, and MELD score
Schneider et al[28], 2019GermanyRCEnd-stage liver disease (alcohol 63.4%, viral 8.5%)61557.261.9NRKryptor immunoassay16.3 pmol/L, T3:T1-29.3Age, sex, and MELD-Na score
Zhao et al[29], 2019ChinaPCHBV related ACLF1514983.4NRELISA18.7 pmol/L, median1Age, sex, and MELD score
Hartl et al[30], 2021AustriaRCACLD (alcohol 36.2%, viral 35.9%)66356.668.216.5Kryptor immunoassay11.4 pmol/L, ULN26.2Age, sex, MELD score, HVPG, albumin, sodium, and presence of HCC
Shigefuku et al[36], 2021JapanRCCLD (alcohol 45.9%, viral 57.0%), cirrhosis 66.5%17067.358.2NRAutomated copeptin immunofluorescent assay4.8 pmol/L, ROC analysis48Age, sex, eGFR, ALBI score, and presence of HCC
Table 2 Quality evaluation of the included studies via the Newcastle-Ottawa scale
Ref.
Representativeness of the exposed cohort
Selection of the non-exposed cohort
Ascertainment of exposure
Outcome not present at baseline
Control for age and sex
Control for other confounding factors
Assessment of outcome
Suitable follow-up duration
Adequacy of follow-up of cohorts
Total
Moreno et al[23], 20131111111018
Kerbert et al[24], 20150111111118
Sola 2016-original1111111018
Sola 2016-validation0111111017
Kerbert et al[25], 20161111111119
Kerbert et al[27], 20170111111017
Schneider et al[28], 20190111111017
Zhao et al[29], 20191111111018
Hartl et al[30], 20210111111118
Shigefuku et al[36], 20211111111119