Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2023; 29(19): 2916-2931
Published online May 21, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i19.2916
Table 1 Possible methods for monitoring the anticoagulant ability of direct oral anticoagulants[49,71,87]

Qualitative methods
Quantitative methods
Other
aPTT
TT
PT
Anti-FIIa levels
Anti-Fxa levels
Plasma level
dTT
ECT/ECA
CBC
CMP
Dabigatran222112222
Apixaban21122
Edoxaban21122
Rivaroxaban21122
Table 2 Pharmacological characteristics of direct oral anticoagulant[71,87]

Dabigatran
Apixaban
Edoxaban
Rivaroxaban
Target factorThrombin (Factor IIa)Factor XaFactor XaFactor Xa
Half-time (h)10.7-11.86.12-8.116.21-6.705.7-12.6
Time to peak effect (h)43.0-3.51-1.51.4-3.3
Distribution volume (L)50-702110750
Renal excretion (%)852735.4-5050
Fecal excretion (%)62562.250
Hepatic metabolismNoCYP3A4/5CYP3A4CYP3A4 and CYP2J2
TransporterP-gPP-gP/BCRPP-gPP-gP/BCRP
Protein binding (%)28.2-31.58740.0-58.992-95
DialyzableYesNoNoNo
ProdrugYesNoNoNo
Bioavailability (%)6.55061.866-112
Dose for AF (in Japan)150 mg5 mg60 mg15 mg
Dosing timeTwice dailyTwice dailyOnce dailyOnce daily
Reversal agentIdarucizumabAndexanet alfaAndexanet alfaAndexanet alfa
FDA-approved indicationsNonvalvular AF, VTE (T, SP, P) Nonvalvular AF, VTE (T, SP, P)Nonvalvular AF, VTE (T)Nonvalvular AF, VTE (T, SP, P)
Japanese insurance system-approved indicationsNonvalvular AF (P)Nonvalvular AF (P), VTE (T, SP)Nonvalvular AF (P), VTE (T, SP)Nonvalvular AF (P), VTE (T, SP)
Non-pharmacologic interactionsAge, reduced GFRAge, reduced body weight, reduced GFR, probable severe liver damageReduced GFR, probable severe liver damageAge, reduced GFR, probable severe liver damage
Drug interactionsDose reduction: Concomitant P-gp inhibitor, gastric acid inhibitory drugAvoid: Concomitant P-gp and CYP3A4 inhibitorsAvoid: Concomitant rifampinAvoid: Rivaroxaban with concomitant dual P-gp and CYP3A4 inhibitors
ContraindicationsCcr: < 30mL/minNonvalvular AF: Ccr: < 15mL/min, VTE:Nonvalvular AF: Ccr: < 15mL/min, VTE:Nonvalvular AF: Ccr: < 15mL/min, VTE:
Ccr: < 30mL/minCcr: < 30mL/minCcr: < 30mL/min
Table 3 Comparison of clinical trials on patients receiving direct oral anticoagulant: Major bleeding

Dabigatran
Apixaban
Edoxaban
Rivaroxaban
Trial nameRE-LY[4]ARISTOTLE[5]ENGAGE AF TIMI48[6]ROCKET AF[7]/J-ROCKET AF
Number of patients18113182012110514264
MethodPROBERCTRCTRCT
Primary endpointsStroke or systemic embolismIschemic or hemorrhagic stroke or systemic embolismStroke or systemic embolismStroke or systemic embolism
Period (years)2.01.82.81.9
CHADS2 score (mean)2.22.12.83.48 (J-ROCKET: 3.25)
Dosing dose150 mg/10 mg bid5 mg bid60 mg/30 mg qd20 mg od (J-ROCKET: 15 mg od)
Evaluation
Thrombus/embolism (vs warfarin)110 mg: Non-inferior, 150 mg: SuperiorSuperior60 mg: Similar, 30 mg: SimilarOn treatment: Superior, Intention-to-treat: Non-inferior
Outcomes: Stroke or systemic embolismWar: 1.69%/yr, D (110): 1.51%/yr, D (150): 1.11%/yrWar: 1.50%/yr, A: 1.27%/yrWar: 1.81%/yr, E (30): 2.06%/yr, E (60): 1.57%/yrWar: 2.2%/yr, R: 1.7%/yr
Major bleeding (vs warfarin)110 mg: Superior, 150 mg: SimilarSuperiorSuperiorSimilar
Bleeding rateWar: 3.36%/yr, D (110): 2.71%/yr, D (150): 3.11%/yrWar: 3.09%/yr, A: 2.13%/yrWar: 3.43%/yr, E (30): 1.61%/yr, E (60): 2.75%/yrWar: 3.4%/yr, R: 3.6%/yr
Intracranial bleedingWar: 0.74%/yr, D (110): 0.23%/yr, D (150): 0.30%/yrWar: 2.27%/yr, A: 1.79%/yrWar: 0.85%/yr, E (30): 0.26%/yr, E (60): 0.39%/yrWar: 0.7%/yr, R: 0.5%/yr
Gastrointestinal bleedingWar: 1.02%/yr, D (110): 1.12%/yr, D (150): 1.51%/yrWar: 0.86%/yr, A: 0.76%/yrWar: 1.23%/yr, E (30): 0.82%/yr, E (60): 1.51%/yrWar: 2.2%/yr, R: 3.2%/yr1
Minor bleeding (vs warfarin)War: 16.37%/yr, D (110): 13.16%/yr, D (150): 14.84%/yrWar: 6.01%/yr, A: 4.07%/yrWar: 4.89%/yr, E (30): 3.52%/yr, E (60): 4.12%/yrWar: 11.4%/yr, R: 11.8%/yr
Mortality rateWar: 4.13%/yr, D (110): 3.75%/yr, D (150): 3.64%/yrWar: 3.94%/yr, A: 3.52%/yrWar: 4.35%/yr, E (30): 3.80%/yr, E (60): 3.99%/yrWar: 2.2%/yr, R: 1.9%/yr
Table 4 Summary of international guidelines concerning withdrawal of direct oral anticoagulants during gastroenterological endoscopy
Ref.
Country
Standard endoscopy
Biopsy
Low risk of bleeding
High risk of bleeding, including ESD
[71]Japan12Avoid peak plasma level2Avoid peak plasma level3(1) Withdraw on the day of treatment; and (2) Heparin replacement
[72]Europe13Withdraw on the day of treatment3Withdraw on the day of treatment3(1) Withdraw 3 d before treatment; (2) Withdraw 5 d before treatment for dabigatran patients at Ccr 30–50 mL/min; and (3) No heparin bridging
[73]United States1113(1) Withdraw; and (2) Bridge therapy required for patients at high risk for thromboembolic events
[74]Korea1113Withdraw 2 d before treatment
[75]Asia-Pacific1113Withdraw 2 d before treatment
Table 5 Delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants
Ref.
Year
Country
Type
Organ
DOAC patients
Bleeding rate
Non-DOAC patients
Bleeding rate
Nagata et al[83]2018JapanRetrospectiveUpper GI27539.6%301 (warfarin)45.8%
Horie et al[85]2022JapanRetrospectiveEsophagus16113%86920.3%1
Yoshio et al[88]2017JapanRetrospectiveStomach2420.8%73 (warfarin)24.6%
Sanomura et al[89]2018JapanRetrospectiveStomach2119.0%40 (warfarin)17.5%
Saito et al[90]2020JapanRetrospectiveStomach7719.5%66 (warfarin)22.7%
Hatta et al[36]2021JapanRetrospectiveStomach25317.0%10,0674.4%1
Tomida et al[84]2021JapanRetrospectiveStomach26114%467 (warfarin)18%
Choi et al[91]2021KoreaRetrospectiveStomach238.7%14993.0%
Kagawa et al[37]2022JapanRetrospectiveStomach3915.4%7524.3%1
Nagata et al[83]2018JapanRetrospectiveLower GI12113.2%111 (warfarin)25.9%
Yamashita et al[92]2018JapanRetrospectiveColon922.0%19 (warfarin)26.3%
Ogiyama et al[93]2020JapanRetrospectiveColon4323.3%44 (warfarin)11.4%
Harada et al[94]2020JapanRetrospectiveColon2516.0%26 (warfarin)7.7%