Changing trends in the minimally invasive surgery for chronic pancreatitis

Table 1 Studies comparing endoscopic and surgical management of chronic pancreatitis

Ref.	Country	No. of patients (n), surgery/endoscopy	Complete and partial pain relief (%), surgery/endoscopy	Complication (%), surgery/endoscopy	Mortality (n), surgery/endoscopy	Follow up (mo), surgery/endoscopy
Díte et al[12], 2003	Czech Republic	36/36	86/61	Not reported	0/0	60
Cahen et al[20], 2011	Netherlands	16/15	80/38	0/25	0/1	79
Hong et al[19], 2011	China	27/35	77/47	14/22	1/0	60
Kawashima et al[17], 2018	Japan	41/10	100/100	20/27	0/0	-
Jiang et al[18], 2018	China	40/46	83/80	26/8	0/0	63.5/57.3
Issa et al[21], 2020	Netherlands	44/44	58/39	27/25	0/0	18

Table 2 Studies on laparoscopic Puestow procedure

Ref.	Country	No. of patients (n)	Mean operative time (min)	Mean hospital stay (d)	Conversion (n)	Mortality	Follow up, (mo)	Complete pain relief (%)
Kurian et al[72], 1999	United States	5	240.0	3-7	Nil	Nil	30.0	80.0
Tantia et al[73], 2004	India	17	277.0	5.2	4	Nil	12.0	82.3
Palanivelu et al[74], 2006	India	12	172.0	5.0	Nil	Nil	52.8	83.3
Khaled et al[75], 2014	United Kingdom	6	278.0	7.0	Not reported	Nil	14.2	66.7
Sahoo et al[76], 2014	India	12	265.5	5.8	Nil	Nil	16.5	100 (follow up reported for 8 patients)
Kim and Hong[77], 2016	Korea	11	200.0	7.0	Nil	Nil	21.0	100
Bhandarwar, et al[78], 2019	India	28	189.7	5.8	4	Nil	12.0	87.5
Rege et al[79], 2019	India	32	131.2	5.2	1	Nil	14.2	75.0
Javed et al[80], 2020	India	41	180.0	5.0	Excluded	Nil	43.6	91.0
Nag et al[81], 2022	India	33	300.0	7.0	Nil	Nil	25.0	71.0

Table 3 Studies on laparoscopic Frey’s procedure

Ref.	Country	Patients (n)	Mean operative time (min)	Mean hospital stay (d)	Conversion (n)	Mortality	Follow up (mo)	Complete and partial pain relief
Tan et al[88], 2015	China	9	323	7	2	Nil	3	Not reported
Kilburn et al[89], 2017	Australia	4	130	7	Nil	Nil	26	100%
Senthilnathan et al[90], 2019	India	15	271	6.4	10 out of 57 patients in different arms	Nil	60	88%