Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2022; 28(45): 6328-6344
Published online Dec 7, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i45.6328
Table 1 Variants of concern reported for coronavirus disease 2019
VOCs
First time reported
Country of origin
Alpha (B.1.1.7)December 2020United Kingdom
Beta (B.1.351)December 2020South Africa
Gamma (P.1)January 2021Brazil
Delta (B.1.617.2)December 2020India
Omicron (B.1.1.529)November 2021South Africa
Table 2 Changes in gut and airway microbiota bacterial species during coronavirus disease 2019
Changes
COVID-19 vs non-COVID-19 patients
Number of patients COVID-19 vs non-COVID-19
Ref.
Gut microbiota Increase: Ruminococcus gnavus, Ruminococcus torque, Bacteroides dorei100 vs 78[20]
Decrease: Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Eubacterium rectale
Increase: Streptococcus, Rothia, Veillonella, Actinomyces30 vs 30[80]
Increase: Blautia, Coprococcus, Collinsella53 vs 76[81]
Decrease: Streptococcus, Weissella, Enterococcus, Rothia, Lactobacillus, Actinomyces
Increase: Bifidobacterium, Bacteroides, Parabacteroides, Escherichia-Shigella22 vs 40[82]
Decrease: Faecalibacterium, Dorea, Enterobacter
Increase: Corynebacterium, Campylobacter, Klebsiella50 vs 34[83]
Increase: Streptococcus, Clostridium, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium64 vs 40[84]
Decrease: Bacteroidetes, Roseburia, Faecalibacterium, Coprococcus, Parabacteroides
Airway microbiotaIncrease: Veillonella, Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, Neisseria, Actinobacillus, Selenomonas192 vs 95[85]
Decrease: Haemophilus, Alloiococcus
Increase: Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus delbrueckii, Lactobacillus salivarius19 vs 23[86]
Increase: Corynebacterium_1, Staphylococcus, Dolosigranulum, Peptoniphilus, Lawsonella38 vs 21[87]
Decrease: Leptotrichia, Fusobacterium (especially Fusobacterium periodonticum), Haemophilus18 vs 12[88]
Increase: Propionibacteriaceae31 vs 9[89]
Decrease: Corynebacterium accolens
Table 3 Biomarkers associated with coronavirus disease 2019
Decreased levels
Increased levels
LymphocytesWhite blood cells
PlateletsD-dimers
EosinophilsFibrinogen
C-reactive protein
Procalcitonin
Lactate dehydrogenase
Ferritin
IL-6
ALT, AST
Alkaline phosphatase
Total bilirubin
Table 4 Nutraceuticals used to improve disease severity and outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 patients
Nutraceuticals
Number of patients with vs without nutraceutical agent
Results
Ref.  
Probiotic combined Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus and Enterococcus179 vs 196Shorter time to clinical improvement (fever, hospital stay, viral shedding) in hospitalized COVID-19 subjects[153]
Probiotic Lactobacillus hamnosus GG566 vs 566Extended time until the development of infection with COVID-19, reduced the severity of the disease, changed the composition of the intestinal microbiota in the household contact infected with COVID-19 (after 28 d)[154]
Probiotic Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum99 vs 101The duration of diarrhea was shorter in patients who received the probiotic than in those who did not. No significant effect on mortality, no change in most biomarkers in patients with COVID-19 in hospitalized patients (at 14 d)[155]
Vitamin D3 (single oral bolus of 80000 IU)57 vs 9The severity of COVID-19 decreased. Improved survival rate[156]
25-hydroxyvitamin D350 vs 26Reduced the need for treatment in the ICU in patients hospitalized due to proven COVID-19[157]
Quercetin21 vs 21Decreased virus clearance, frequency of symptoms and level of LDH and ferritin parameters[158]