Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2022; 28(44): 6294-6309
Published online Nov 28, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i44.6294
Published online Nov 28, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i44.6294
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the patients (full analysis set)
Variables | Fexuprazan 40 mg (n = 116) | Esomeprazole 40 mg (n = 115) | P value | |
Age, yr (mean ± SD)5 | 53.70 ± 12.44 | 55.05 ± 12.89 | 0.343w | |
Sex, n (%)6 | ||||
Men | 78 (67.2) | 74 (64.3) | 0.643c | |
Women | 38 (32.8) | 41 (35.7) | ||
BMI, kg/m2 (SD)5 | 24.42 ± 3.08 | 24.81 ± 3.25 | 0.529w | |
Smoking history, n (%)6 | ||||
Non-smokers | 67 (57.8) | 66 (57.4) | 0.978c | |
Current smokers | 25 (21.6) | 26 (22.6) | ||
Past smokers | 24 (20.7) | 23 (20.0) | ||
Drinking history, n (%)6 | ||||
Non-drinkers | 15 (12.9) | 15 (13.0) | 0.992c | |
Current drinkers | 77 (66.4) | 77 (67.0) | ||
Past drinkers | 24 (20.7) | 23 (20.0) | ||
LA classification1, n (%)6 | ||||
Grade A | 75 (64.7) | 76 (66.1) | 0.630f | |
Grade B | 33 (28.4) | 31 (27.0) | ||
Grade C | 6 (5.2) | 8 (7.0) | ||
Grade D | 2 ( 1.7) | 0 (0.0) | ||
Helicobacter pylori2, n (%)6 | ||||
Positive | 20 (17.4) | 31 (27.2) | 0.075c | |
Negative | 95 (82.6) | 83 (72.8) | ||
CYP2C193, n (%)6 | ||||
EM | 39 (76.5) | 53 (94.6) | 0.007c | |
PM | 12 (23.5) | 3 (5.4) | ||
Severity for heartburn4, n (%)6 | ||||
Mild | 53 (45.7) | 50 (43.5) | 0.735c | |
Moderate/severe | 63 (54.3) | 65 (56.5) |
Table 2 Change in reflux disease questionnaires symptom scores from baseline at weeks 4 and 8 (per protocol set)
Fexuprazan 40 mg | Esomeprazole 40 mg | ||||||
Baseline (n = 107) | Week 4 (n = 103) | Week 8 (n = 107) | Baseline (n = 111) | Week 4 (n = 104) | Week 8 (n = 111) | ||
Frequency | |||||||
Heartburn | |||||||
mean ± SD | 1.92 ± 1.23 | 0.91 ± 1.37 | 0.86 ± 1.33 | 2.12 ± 1.42 | 0.80 ± 1.29 | 0.70 ± 1.28 | |
Change from baseline (mean ± SD) | - | -0.96 ± 1.50 | -1.06 ± 1.49 | - | -1.33 ± 1.69 | -1.42 ± 1.64 | |
P value1 | - | < 0.001w | < 0.001w | - | < 0.001w | < 0.001w | |
LS mean difference from esomeprazole | - | 0.19 | 0.22 | - | - | - | |
P value2 | - | 0.280 | 0.184 | - | - | - | |
Reflux | |||||||
mean ± SD | 2.14 ± 1.29 | 0.93 ± 1.48 | 0.92 ± 1.49 | 1.95 ± 1.29 | 0.61 ± 1.07 | 0.59 ± 1.12 | |
Change from baseline (mean ± SD) | - | -1.19 ± 1.58 | -1.22 ± 1.53 | - | -1.32 ± 1.44 | -1.36 ± 1.40 | |
P value1 | - | < 0.001w | < 0.001w | - | < 0.001w | < 0.001w | |
LS mean difference from esomeprazole | - | 0.28 | 0.28 | - | - | - | |
P value2 | - | 0.112 | 0.101 | - | - | - | |
Severity | |||||||
Heartburn | |||||||
mean ± SD | 1.81 ± 1.18 | 0.57 ± 0.78 | 0.53 ± 0.77 | 2.10 ± 1.24 | 0.45 ± 0.75 | 0.42 ± 0.79 | |
Change from baseline (mean ± SD) | - | -1.23 ± 1.26 | -1.28 ± 1.26 | - | -1.63 ± 1.29 | -1.68 ± 1.27 | |
P value1 | - | < 0.001w | < 0.001w | - | < 0.001w | < 0.001w | |
LS mean difference from esomeprazole | - | 0.16 | 0.16 | - | - | - | |
P value2 | - | 0.116 | 0.121 | - | - | - | |
Reflux | |||||||
mean ± SD | 2.06 ± 1.22 | 0.61 ± 0.92 | 0.58 ± 0.90 | 1.97 ± 1.21 | 0.40 ± 0.69 | 0.39 ± 0.73 | |
Change from baseline (mean ± SD) | - | -1.43 ± 1.23 | -1.48 ± 1.20 | - | -1.55 ± 1.23 | -1.58 ± 1.19 | |
P value1 | - | < 0.001w | < 0.001w | - | < 0.001w | < 0.001w | |
LS mean difference from esomeprazole | - | 0.20 | 0.18 | - | - | - | |
P value2 | - | 0.066 | 0.089 | - | - | - |
Table 3 Change in gastroesophageal reflux disease-health related quality of life score from baseline at weeks 4 and 8 (per protocol set)
GERD-HRQL | Fexuprazan 40 mg | Esomeprazole 40 mg | ||||
Baseline (n = 107) | Week 4 (n = 102) | Week 8 (n = 106) | Baseline (n = 111) | Week 4 (n = 104) | Week 8 (n = 111) | |
mean ± SD | 11.88 ± 8.11 | 4.21 ± 6.17 | 4.01 ± 6.20 | 12.98 ± 9.62 | 3.42 ± 5.04 | 3.32 ± 5.54 |
Change from baseline (mean ± SD) | - | -7.71 ± 8.37 | -7.90 ± 8.56 | - | -9.84 ± 8.70 | -9.67 ± 8.56 |
P value1 | - | < 0.001w | < 0.001t | - | < 0.001w | < 0.001w |
LS mean difference from esomeprazole | - | 1.06 | 1.05 | - | - | - |
P value2 | - | 0.137 | 0.151 | - | - | - |
Table 4 Overall Summary of treatment-emergent adverse events (safety set)
Fexuprazan 40 mg (n = 131) | Esomeprazole 40 mg (n = 131) | Total (n = 262) | |
n (%) [number of event] | |||
Subjects with TEAEs | 22 (16.8) [34] | 25 (19.1) [34] | 47 (17.9) [68] |
95%CI | [10.4, 23.2] | [12.4, 25.8] | [13.3, 22.6] |
P value1 | 0.629c | ||
Subjects with ADRs | 9 (6.9) [13] | 7 (5.3) [11] | 16 (6.1) [24] |
95%CI | [2.5, 11.2] | [1.5, 9.2] | [3.2, 9.0] |
P value1 | 0.606c | ||
Subjects with serious TEAEs | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subjects with serious ADRs | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Most frequently occurring (≥ 2%) TEAEs by system organ class and preferred term | |||
System organ class preferred term | |||
Gastrointestinal disorders | |||
Diarrhoea | 4 (3.1) [4] | 2 (1.5) [2] | 6 (2.3) [6] |
Nervous system disorders | |||
Dizziness | 1 (0.8) [1] | 3 (2.3) [3] | 4 (1.5) [4] |
- Citation: Lee KN, Lee OY, Chun HJ, Kim JI, Kim SK, Lee SW, Park KS, Lee KL, Choi SC, Jang JY, Kim GH, Sung IK, Park MI, Kwon JG, Kim N, Kim JJ, Lee ST, Kim HS, Kim KB, Lee YC, Choi MG, Lee JS, Jung HY, Lee KJ, Kim JH, Chung H. Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fexuprazan compared with esomeprazole in erosive esophagitis. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(44): 6294-6309
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i44/6294.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i44.6294