Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2022; 28(36): 5250-5264
Published online Sep 28, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i36.5250
Published online Sep 28, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i36.5250
Ref. | Sample size HCC/control | Assay type | TGF-β1 level | Sample type | Outcome of the study |
[60,61] | 26/20 | ELISA | Control: 1.4 ± 0.8 ng/mL | Plasma | TGF-β1 level showed a progressive elevation from cirrhotic to HCC patients to normal subjects. No significant association was found between plasma TGF-β1 and serum AFP levels |
HCC: 19.3 ± 1.95 ng/mL (P < 0.05) | |||||
[62,63] | 70 | ELISA | Control: 2.7 ± 0.7 ng/mL | Plasma | Elevated plasma TGF-β1 levels in HCC patients are associated with increased tumor size, overexpression of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 and tumor severity |
HCC: 7.3 ± 4.3 ng/mL (P < 0.05) | |||||
[54,55] | 94/50 | 125I-Radio Immuno Assay Kit | Control: 1.5-33.6 μg-1creatinine | Urine | Urinary TGF-β1 and serum AFP levels were higher in HCC than in cirrhotic patients. The study suggested that both TGF-β and AFP can be used as complementary biomarkers to distinguish between HCC and cirrhosis |
Cirrhotic: 4.3-52.5 μg-1creatinine | |||||
HCC: 3.5-184 μg-1creatinine (P < 0.0001) | |||||
[64] | 54/30 | ELISA | TGF-β1 score | Serum | The study team calculated the serum concentration score based on the cut-off limit of 74 pg/mL and 637 pg/mL for TGF-β1 and sFas, respectively. TGF-β1 levels were higher than the cut off value in 23% HCC patients with negative AFP values, suggesting its diagnostic potential in AFP negative HCC |
Control: 0.6 ± 0.2 | |||||
HCC: 1.6 ± 0.5 | |||||
[65] | 38/23 | ELISA | Control: 300 pg/mL | Plasma | Elevated plasma TGF-β1 level can be a useful diagnostic marker in detecting small HCC, with higher sensitivity than AFP |
HCC: 954.9 pg/mL (P < 0.0001) | |||||
[66] | 70/32 | ELISA | Control: 2 ng/mL | Plasma | Higher circulating TGF-β1 in HCC patients is associated with suppression of anti-tumor immunity and disease progression |
HCC: 7.5 ng/mL (P < 0.0001) | |||||
[52] | 50/30 | ELISA | Control: 0.67 ± 0.1 μg/mL | Serum | Aberrant TGF-β1 expression in HCC is associated with differentiation and worsening of HBV infection |
HCC: 2.21 ± 1.1 μg/mL (sensitivity = 89.5%, specificity = 94%) | |||||
RT-PCR | Overexpression TGF-β1 mRNA in HCC patients, P < 0.0001 | Circulating TGF-β1 level and TGF-β1 mRNA expression can be used as sensitive biomarkers for diagnosing HBV induced HCC | |||
[56] | 23/40 | ELISA | Control: 14.35 ± 8.76 ng/mL | Serum | TGF-β1 is a sensitive diagnostic marker for HCC than AFP. Specificity can be increased with combined evaluation of TGF-β1 and AFP levels |
HCC: 64.35 ± 33.68 ng/mL (P < 0.05) | |||||
[67] | 54/30 | ELISA | Control: 39.5 ± 9.8 pg/mL | Serum | The study suggested elevated TGF-β1 and EGFR levels as reliable diagnostic markers for HCC induced, AFP negative HCC |
HCC: 1194 ± 331 pg/mL (P < 0.0001) | |||||
[68] | 120/30 | ELISA | Control: 250.16 ± 284.61 pg/mL | Serum | TGF-β1 showed progressive elevation during various stages of liver dysfunction. Higher TGF-β1 level in HCC is associated with tumor grade, pathological stage and invasiveness |
Cirrhotic: 487.98 ± 344.23 pg/mL | |||||
HCC: 1687.47 ± 1642 pg/mL (P < 0.0001) | |||||
[69] | 100/36 | ELISA | Control: 57.29 ± 11.70 ng/mL | Serum | Serum levels of TGF-β were significantly higher in HCC patients than in normal controls |
HCC: 225.82 ± 48.93 ng/mL (P < 0.0001) |
Ref. | Sample size HCC/control | Sample and assay type | TGF-β1 level | Survival rate (%), (patients with higher TGF-β1 vs patients with lower TGF-β1) | Outcome of the study | ||
[75] | 571/551 | Plasma | Control: 3.58 ± 0.17 log10 pg/mL | 1 yr survival (47 vs 60) | 3 yr survival (28 vs 36) P < 0.05 | Plasma TGF-β1 levels showed a positive correlation with tumor size, invasion and extrahepatic metastasis and inversely correlated with survival rates in HCC patients | |
ELISA | Cirrhotic: 3.20 ± 0.37 log10 pg/mL | ||||||
HCC: 3.83 ± 0.31 log10 pg/mL | |||||||
[83] | 126 | Tumor tissue | 84% samples (106/126) showed high intra-tumoral TGF-β1 expression | 5 yr survival (8.5 vs 45.6) | TGF-β1 and FGFR4 were positively correlated in HCC tumor tissues and showed a significant association with shorter survival rates in patients | ||
Immunohistochemistry | 64.3% samples (81/126) showed high peri-tumoral TGF-β1 expression | ||||||
[80] | 84/20 | Tumor tissue | TGF-β1 overexpression found in 59.5% samples (50/84) than that of normal liver tissue | 1 yr survival (28 vs 79.4) | 5 yr survival (12 vs 62.6) | TGF-β1 expression was dominant, whereas ELF expression was suppressed in HCC tissues | |
Immunohistochemistry | Patients with high TGF-β1 and lower ELF expression are associated with poor overall survival and post-operative disease free survival compared with low TGF-β1 and high ELF group | ||||||
[76] | 184/30 | Plasma and tumor tissue | Elevated plasma TGF-β1 level | 2 yr survival ( 51 vs 77) | 3 yr survival (4 vs 68), P < 0.05 | Higher TGF-β1 expression in tumor tissues triggers Treg cells mediated immunosuppression in tumor microenvironment and contribute to poor prognosis in HCC | |
ELISA and immunohistochemistry | TGF-β1 was strongly stained in tumor tissue | ||||||
[84] | 40 | Serum | Before RFA: 63.22 ± 23.61 ng/mL | After RFA: 56.33 ± 24.24 ng/mL | NA | Radiofrequency ablation lowered TGF-β1 and AFP L3% expression in HCC patients | |
ELISA | Low TGF-β1 and AFP L3% levels were observed in the no recurrence group, suggesting its potential as prognostic markers for HCC |
Drug | Title of the study | Treatment | Phase | Status | Trial ID |
Galunisertib | A study of Galunisertib on the immune system in participants with cancer | Monotherapy | Phase I | Completed | NCT02304419 |
Galunisertib | Galunisertib (LY2157299) and stereotactic body radiotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma | Combination with radiotherapy | Phase I | Completed | NCT02906397 |
Galunisertib | A study of LY2157299 in participants with unresectable hepatocellular cancer | Combination with Nivolumab | Phase II | Completed | NCT02423343 |
Galunisertib | A study of LY2157299 in participants with unresectable hepatocellular cancer | Combination with Sorafenib | Phase I | Completed | NCT02240433 |
Galunisertib | A study of LY2157299 in participants with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma | Combination with Sorafenib | Phase II | Completed | NCT02178358 |
Galunisertib | A study of LY2157299 in participants with hepatocellular carcinoma | Combination with Sorafenib/Ramucirumumab | Phase II | Completed | NCT01246986 |
Galunisertib | Galunisertib and Capecitabine in advanced resistant TGF-beta activated colorectal cancer (EORTC1615) | Combination with Capecitabine | Phase II | Withdrawn | NCT03470350 |
Galunisertib | A study of LY2157299 in participants with pancreatic cancer (advanced or has spread to another part of the body) | Combination with Gemcitabine | Phase I | Completed | NCT02154646 |
Galunisertib | A study of Galunisertib (LY2157299) and Durvalumab (MEDI4736) in participants with metastatic pancreatic cancer | Combination with Durvalumab | Phase I | Completed | NCT02734160 |
- Citation: Devan AR, Pavithran K, Nair B, Murali M, Nath LR. Deciphering the role of transforming growth factor-beta 1 as a diagnostic-prognostic-therapeutic candidate against hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(36): 5250-5264
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i36/5250.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i36.5250