Randomized Clinical Trial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2022; 28(33): 4875-4889
Published online Sep 7, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i33.4875
Table 1 Characteristics of the study population
VariableTotal (n = 40)Group
P value
LM-PF (n = 20)
POEM (n = 20)
Male, n (%)26 (65)14 (70.0)12 (60.0)0.507
Age in yr, mean ± SD44.55 (13.77)44.20 (13.21)44.90 (14.64)0.875
Etiology of achalasia, n (%)1.000
Chagas disease9 (22.5)4 (20.0)5 (25.0)
Idiopathic31 (77.5)16 (80.0)15 (75.0)
BMI in kg/m2, mean ± SD22.78 (4.49)22.79 (4.41)22.77 (4.70)0.988
Eckardt score, median (IQR)8.00 (6.25-9.00)8.50 (7.25-9.75)8.00 (6.00-9.00)0.478
Table 2 Eckardt scores
Time pointTotal (n = 40), median (IQR)Group
P value1
LM-PF (n = 20), median (IQR)
POEM (n = 20), median (IQR)
Baseline8.00 (6.25-9.00)8.50 (7.25-9.75)8.00 (6.00-9.00)0.478
1 mo0.00 (0.00-1.00)0.00 (0.00-1.00)1.00 (0.00-1.00)0.192
6 mo0.00 (0.00-1.75)0.00 (0.00-1.00)0.50 (0.00-2.00)0.242
12 mo0.00 (0.00-1.75)0.00 (0.00-1.00)0.50 (0.00-2.00)0.242
Table 3 Treatment success
Time pointTotal (n = 40), n (%)Group
P value1
LM-PF (n = 20), n (%)
POEM (n = 20), n (%)
1 mo40 (100.0)20 (100.0)20 (100.0)-
6 mo38 (95.0)20 (100.0)18 (90.0)0.487
12 mo39 (97.50)20 (100.0)19 (95.0)1.000
Table 4 Reflux esophagitis
Time pointn (%) of TotalGroup
P value1
LM-PF, n (%) of Total
POEM, n (%) of Total
Baseline1 (2.5) of 400 (0.0) of 201 (5.0) of 201.000
1 mo5 (13.5) of 370 (0.0) of 205 (29.4) of 170.014
6 mo11 (32.4) of 341 (5.6) of 1810 (62.5) of 16< 0.001
12 mo13 (37.1) of 352 (11.1) of 1811 (64.6) of 170.002
Table 5 Height of the barium column in cm
VariableTotal (n = 40)Group
LM-PF (n = 20)
POEM (n = 20)
Height at 1 min
Baseline17.48 (8.11)16.97 (6.70)17.99 (9.46)
1 mo9.90 (5.88)11.39 (4.18)8.42 (6.99)
6 mo8.91 (4.49)9.61 (3.72)8.22 (5.15)
12 mo10.35 (3.38)10.98 (2.73)9.73 (3.90)
Height at 5 min
Baseline15.31 (8.13)14.92 (7.06)15.69 (9.24)
1 mo5.53 (5.41)6.30 (4.84)4.75 (5.95)
6 mo5.69 (5.14)5.99 (4.56)5.39 (5.77)
12 mo8.31 (4.96)8.66 (4.92)7.97 (5.10)
Table 6 Esophageal manometry results of lower esophageal sphincter pressure in mmHg
VariableTime pointTotal (n = 40)Group
LM-PF (n = 20)
POEM (n = 20)
Maximal expiratory pressureBaseline25.98 (10.42)24.53 (9.90)27.43 (10.98)
6 mo10.44 (5.86)9.93 (5.45)10.94 (6.34)
12 mo10.11 (5.09)9.34 (4.19)10.87 (5.85)
Table 7 Adverse events, length of hospital stay, anesthesia time, and procedure time
VariableTotal (n = 40)Group
P value
LM-PF (n = 20)
POEM (n = 20)
Adverse events, n (%) 4 (10.0)1 (5.0)3 (15.0)0.605a
Length of hospital stay in d3.68 (2.42)3.95 (3.36)3.40 (0.75)0.483b
Anesthesia time in min240.88 (79.46)296.75 (56.13)185.00 (56.89)< 0.001b
Procedure time in min157.23 (74.81)218.75 (50.88)95.70 (30.47)< 0.001b
Table 8 Quality of life
SF-36 domainBaseline score
P valueScore at 12 mo
P value
LM-PF (n = 20), median (IQR)
POEM (n = 20), median (IQR)
LM-PF (n = 20), median (IQR)
POEM (n = 20), median (IQR)
Physical functioning95.00 (70.0-100.0)77.50 (62.25-95.0)0.165100.0 (90.0-100.0)92.50 (66.25-100.0)0.183
Role-physical100.0 (56.25-100.0)25.0 (0.00-68.75)0.012100.0 (100.0-100.0)100.0 (56.25-100.0)0.445
Role-emotional100.0 (33.30-100.0)33.30 (0.00-66.70)0.021100.0 (66.70-100.0)100.0 (41.65-100.0)0.640
Vitality67.5 (46.25-88.75)52.50 (36.25-65.00)0.05285.0 (56.25-100.0)80.0 (56.25-90.0)0.341
Mental health74.0 (54.0-95.0)58.0 (44.0-75.0)0.03094.0 (69.0-100.0)80.0 (57.0-91.0)0.174
Social functioning81.25 (62.50-100.0)56.25 (37.50-71.88)0.006100.0 (78.13-100.0)93.75 (40.63-100.0)0.174
Bodily pain73.75 (49.38-97.50)62.50 (45.0-79.38)0.20190.0 (78.13-100.0)80.0 (55.0-97.50)0.142
General health50.0 (31.25-83.75)55.0 (41.25-65.0)0.69882.50 (61.25-100.0)67.50 (52.50-100.0)0.445

  • Citation: de Moura ETH, Jukemura J, Ribeiro IB, Farias GFA, de Almeida Delgado AA, Coutinho LMA, de Moura DTH, Aissar Sallum RA, Nasi A, Sánchez-Luna SA, Sakai P, de Moura EGH. Peroral endoscopic myotomy vs laparoscopic myotomy and partial fundoplication for esophageal achalasia: A single-center randomized controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(33): 4875-4889
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i33/4875.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i33.4875