Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2022; 28(22): 2457-2467
Published online Jun 14, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i22.2457
Table 1 Statistics distribution from esophageal lesion database

Lesions invading the submucosa and muscularis mucosae
Lesions invading the muscularis propria
Lesions invading the serosal layer
Train47337674
Validation59479
Test59479
Total59147092
Table 2 Statistics distribution from esophageal submucosal lesion database

Lesions from the muscularis propria
Lesions from the muscularis mucosae
Train119294
Validation1537
Test1537
Total149368
Table 3 Data augmentation parameter
Transformation type
Description
RotationDegree range for random rotations: -90°- 90°
ShiftShift fraction of total height and total width: 0.1
ZoomRange for random zoom: 0.9-1.1
FlipRandomly flip image horizontally and vertically.
ShearShear intensity: 0.2 (shear angle in counter-clockwise direction in degrees)
Table 4 Comparative sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy results of classification branch of object detection network and classification network alone

SENS
SPEC
ACC
Object detection classify0.58390.84040.7861
Classification network alone0.74000.90700.8733
Table 5 Comparison of preoperative enhanced ultrasound diagnosis and postoperative pathological diagnosis in patients
Characteristic (n = 726)

Gender, male/female411/315
Age (yr), medina (range)54.5 (26-85)
Invasion depth of esophageal lesion (n)EUS diagnosisPathological diagnosis
Muscularis mucosa/submucosa188147
Muscularis propria197238
Serosa4545
Origin of esophageal lesions (n)
Muscularis mucosa148150
Muscularis propria148146
Table 6 Results of proposed network in esophageal lesion database, %

ACC
SENS
SPEC
Lesions invading the submucosa and muscularis mucosae77.1184.593.6
Lesions invading the muscularis propria73.486.6978.52
Lesions invading the serosa98.97299.14
Lesions from the muscularis mucosa78.6476.3290.62
Lesions from the muscularis propria84.481.6490.92
Average82.4980.2390.56