Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2022; 28(20): 2214-2226
Published online May 28, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i20.2214
Published online May 28, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i20.2214
Table 1 Comparison of demographic and clinical data of patients
Parameters | Ishak 0-2 (n = 9) | Ishak 3-4 (n = 18) | Ishak 5-6 (n = 12) |
Age (yr) | 36.3 ± 15.5 | 37.9 ± 12.4 | 53.1 ± 11.0b |
Male, n (%) | 2 (22.2) | 11 (61.1) | 7 (58.3) |
ALT (U/L) | 44 (22.5) | 52.5 (35.5) | 75.5 (98.7)a |
TB (μmol/L) | 11 (7.5) | 14 (3.5) | 12.5 (7.5) |
Alb (g/L) | 46.78 ± 3.77 | 45.72 ± 3.75 | 44.17 ± 3.35 |
INR | 0.99 ± 0.07 | 1.00 ± 0.09 | 1.09 ± 0.16 |
PLT (× 109/L) | 171 (62.5) | 177.5 (64.7) | 114 (67.5)b |
HCV RNA (log10 IU/mL) | 6.43 ± 0.96 | 6.50 ± 0.71 | 6.33 ± 0.64 |
mHAI score | 3.4 ± 1.7 | 5.3 ± 1.6a | 11.3 ± 4.0c |
Table 2 Clinical characteristics of patients for pre and post sustained virological response
Pre SVR | Post SVR | Z/t value | P value | |
ALT (U/L) | 55 (29.5) | 17 (11) | -4.015 | < 0.001 |
AST (U/L) | 40 (29.5) | 20 (10.5) | -4.016 | < 0.001 |
TB (μmol/L) | 14 (6.5) | 15.5 (11.3) | -0.541 | 0.588 |
Alb (g/L) | 44.90 ± 3.40 | 47.43 ± 3.06 | -3.919 | 0.001 |
Platelet (× 109/L) | 165 (87) | 199 (130) | -2.576 | 0.01 |
INR | 1.04 ± 0.14 | 1.02 ± 0.07 | 0.425 | 0.675 |
mHAI score, n (%) | -2.362 | 0.023 | ||
0-4 | 5 (24) | 15 (71) | ||
5-8 | 10 (48) | 4 (9) | ||
13-18 | 6 (28) | 2 (10) | ||
Ishak score, n (%) | -0.370 | 0.713 | ||
0-2 | 5 (24) | 7 (33) | ||
3-4 | 9 (43) | 7 (33) | ||
5-6 | 7 (33) | 7 (33) | ||
APRI | 0.58 (1.32) | 0.25 (0.40) | -4.015 | < 0.001 |
FIB-4 | 1.34 (3.61) | 0.99 (1.81) | -3.007 | 0.003 |
LSM (kpa) | 6.6 (7.5) | 5.8 (4.0) | -2.746 | 0.006 |
CEI | 1.65 ± 0.11 | 1.68 ± 0.16 | -1.087 | 0.29 |
Table 3 Distribution of patients in stratified analysis
Stratified analysis | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 |
mHAI score | Ishak score | ||
0-2 | 3-4 | 5-6 | |
0-4 | 14 | 11 | 1 |
5-8 | 3 | 13 | 9 |
13-18 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
Ishak score | mHAI score | ||
0-4 | 5-8 | 13-18 | |
0-4 | 14 | 2 | 0 |
3-4 | 10 | 15 | 0 |
5-6 | 1 | 9 | 9 |
Table 4 The area under receiver operating curve and cut-off value for liver cirrhosis and significant liver fibrosis at pre-sustained virological response and post-sustained virological response with contrast enhancement index, aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index, Fibrosis-4 and liver stiffness measurement
Ishak score ≥ 5 | Ishak score ≥ 3 | |||
Pre SVR | Post SVR | Pre SVR | Post SVR | |
CEI | ||||
AUROC (95%CI) | 0.93 (0.74, 0.97) | 0.87 (0.65, 0.97) | 0.88 (0.79, 1.00) | 0.87 (0.71, 1.00) |
Cut-off value | 1.58 | 1.59 | 1.71 | 1.68 |
LSM | ||||
AUROC (95%CI) | 0.87(0.71, 1.00) | 0.87(0.79, 1.00) | 0.91(0.78, 1.00) | 0.80(0.60,0.98) |
Cut-off value | 10.8 | 7.1 | 6.2 | 5.95 |
APRI | ||||
AUROC (95%CI) | 0.89(0.72, 1.00) | 0.89(0.74, 1.00) | 0.83(0.64, 1.00) | N2 |
Cut-off value | 1.05 | 0.241 | 0.39 | N2 |
FIB-4 | ||||
AUROC (95%CI) | 0.92(0.80, 1.00) | 0.92(0.79, 1.00) | 0.80(0.58, 1.00) | N2 |
Cut-off value | 1.78 | 1.281 | 0.87 | N2 |
Table 5 Relationship between the changes of contrast enhancement index, aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index, Fibrosis-4, liver stiffness measurement and fibrosis regression
Fibrosis regression | P value | ||
Yes (n = 7) | No (n = 14) | ||
CEI%1 | 107.36 ± 6.33 | 99.23 ± 7.14 | 0.020 |
LSM% | 72.06 ± 20.32 | 81.31 ± 27.44 | 0.441 |
APRI% | 45.40 ± 13.16 | 42.51 ± 16.41 | 0.702 |
FIB-4% | 90.39 ± 24.09 | 75.69 ± 23.66 | 0.936 |
- Citation: Li XH, Huang R, Yang M, Wang J, Gao YH, Jin Q, Ma DL, Wei L, Rao HY. Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating fibrosis regression in chronic hepatitis C patients after direct-acting antiviral. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(20): 2214-2226
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i20/2214.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i20.2214