Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2022; 28(16): 1705-1717
Published online Apr 28, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i16.1705
Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies: ulcerative colitis patients and Crohn’s disease patients
Ref.
Country
Study design
Period
Sample size N
Age, years (mean or median)
Male, (%)
Patient
IBD therapy
VTE type
Antiel et al[31], 2013 United StatesCohort1999.1-2011.12366≤ 21No dataUCSurgeryIAT
Bence et al[26], 2020United StatesCohort2020.1-2016.627615 (13, 17)46CD, UC, IC Corticosteroids, Biologic therapy, Immunologic therapyDVT
Cairo et al[36], 2017 United StatesRCS2012-2015410< 1 (9.8%); 1-5 (15.7%); 6-10 (30%); 11-15 (34.6%); 16-18 (9.9%)59.5IBDNo dataVTE
Derderian et al[27], 2020United StatesCohort2008-2018499.8 ± 4.465UC/IBD-USurgeryDVT
Diamond et al[32], 2018United StatesCohort2015-2017471446.8IBDSystemic steroids; Anti-TNF therapyCVC-related thrombosis
Diamond et al[33], 2010CanadaCohort1999.11.1-2008.2.298514.8 (2.8)54.1IBDSurgeryDVT
Herzog et al[34], 2018SwitzerlandCohort2006-201763< 1754CD; UC or IBD-U5-ASA Systemic CS; Immunomodulators; Calcineurin inhibitors; TNFα inhibitors, SurgeryTE
Jarchin et al[29], 2019United StatesCohort2008.1-2017.12580-5 (5%); 6-10 (10%); 11-18 (85%)66UCAnti-TNF only, Vedolizumab only, Anti-TNF+ vedolizumab, Anti-TNF+ vedolizumab+ ustekinumab, SurgeryPVT (within 30 d, > 30 d)
Khosravi et al[28], 2020IranCohort20192111.12 ± 5.6542.9IBDSurgeryDVT
Lee et al[35], 2016 KoreaCohort1995.7-2011.67312.49 ± 2.4771.2CDSystemic corticosteroids 5-ASA only, 5-ASA+; azathioprine; 5-ASA only or 5-ASA+ azathioprinePTE
Nylund et al[19], 20131United StatesDatabase review1997, 2000, 2003, 2006, and 200961076/7318/737989815.72 ± 0.02/15.39 ± 0.06/13.57 ± 0.0149.32/47.55/49.64CD, UCNo dataTE, PE, DVT, IVST, PVT
Zitomersky et al[37], 2013United StatesDatabase review2006-2011532No dataNo dataCD, UCNo dataCVT
Table 2 Quality assessment
Ref.
Representativeness of the exposed cohort
Selection of the non-exposed cohort
Ascertainment of exposure
Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study
Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis
Assessment of outcome
Was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur
Adequacy of follow-up of cohorts
Total quality scores
Antiel et al[31], 2013101101116
Bence et al[26], 2020 101101116
Cairo et al[36], 2017111111118
Derderian et al[27], 2020 101101116
Diamond et al[32], 2018 101101116
Diamond et al[33], 2010 101101116
Herzog et al[34], 2018 101101116
Jarchin et al[29], 2019101101116
Khosravi et al[28], 2020 101101116
Lee et al[35], 2016101101116
Nylund et al[19], 2013 111121119
Zitomersky et al[37], 2013101101116