Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2021; 27(18): 2193-2204
Published online May 14, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i18.2193
Published online May 14, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i18.2193
Table 1 Patient clinical characteristics
Variable | Total set (n = 282) | P value | SD | PSM set (1:1) (n = 122) | P value | SD | ||
TLTG (n = 151) | OTG (n = 131) | TLTG (n = 61) | OTG (n = 61) | |||||
Age (yr) | 60.74 ± 11.55 | 59.11 ± 11.02 | 0.231 | 0.144 | 58.30 ± 11.26 | 58.70 ± 10.65 | 0.841 | 0.037 |
Gender | 0.257 | 0.136 | 0.847 | 0.035 | ||||
Male | 94 (62.25) | 90 (68.70) | 40 (65.57) | 41 (67.21) | ||||
Female | 57 (37.75) | 41 (31.30) | 21 (34.43) | 20 (32.79) | ||||
BMI (kg/m²) | 24.57 ± 3.25 | 23.69 ± 3.21 | 0.023 | 0.273 | 24.01 ± 2.98 | 23.98 ± 2.73 | 0.957 | 0.010 |
ASA score | 0.859 | 0.044 | 0.885 | 0.073 | ||||
I | 30 (19.87) | 26 (19.85) | 13 (21.31) | 14 (22.95) | ||||
II | 114 (75.50) | 97 (74.05) | 46 (75.41) | 44 (72.13) | ||||
III | 7 (4.64) | 8 (6.11) | 2 (3.28) | 3 (4.92) | ||||
Number of comorbidities | 0.068 | 0.222 | 0.655 | 0.083 | ||||
0-2 | 137 (90.73) | 126 (96.18) | 59 (75.41) | 44 (72.13) | ||||
> 2 | 14 (9.27) | 5 (3.82) | 2 (3.28) | 3 (4.92) | ||||
Combined operation | 0.176 | 0.161 | > 0.999 | 0 | ||||
No | 136 (90.07) | 111 (84.73) | 55 (90.16) | 55 (90.16) | ||||
Yes | 15 (9.93) | 20 (15.27) | 6 (9.84) | 6 (9.84) | ||||
History of abdominal surgery | 0.061 | 0.254 | 0.846 | 0.103 | ||||
No | 120 (79.47) | 102 (77.86) | 50 (81.97) | 48 (78.69) | ||||
Minor surgery | 24 (15.89) | 14 (10.69) | 6 (9.84) | 6 (9.84) | ||||
Major surgery | 7 (4.64) | 15 (11.45) | 5 (8.20) | 7 (11.48) | ||||
Tumor size (mm, median) | 31 (22, 46) | 64 (36, 85) | < 0.001 | 0.841 | 39 (27, 62) | 50 (28, 68) | 0.865 | 0.028 |
Pathologic tumor stage | < 0.001 | 1.012 | 0.824 | 0.085 | ||||
I | 109 (72.19) | 38 (29.01) | 31 (50.82) | 33 (54.10) | ||||
II | 28 (18.54) | 41 (31.30) | 19 (31.15) | 19 (31.15) | ||||
III | 14 (9.27) | 52 (39.69) | 11 (18.03) | 9 (14.75) |
Table 2 Early surgical outcomes and pathologic data in patients undergoing the totally laparoscopic gastrectomy with the modified overlap method and open total gastrectomy
Variable | Total set (n = 282) | P value | PSM set (1:1) (n = 122) | P value | ||
TLTG (n = 151) | OTG (n = 131) | TLTG (n = 61) | OTG (n = 61) | |||
Operative time (min) | 147.68 ± 29.64 | 145.24 ± 35.48 | 0.282 | 147.11 ± 25.48 | 143.46 ± 38.09 | 0.351 |
Time to first flatus (d) | 3.73 ± 0.90 | 4.14 ± 0.81 | < 0.001 | 3.62 ± 0.84 | 4.15 ± 0.87 | 0.002 |
Time to soft diet (d) | 4.99 ± 3.78 | 7.24 ± 6.29 | < 0.001 | 4.62 ± 2.67 | 7.47 ± 7.92 | 0.001 |
Perioperative transfusion (n) | < 0.001 | 0.035 | ||||
No | 145 (96.03) | 107 (81.68) | 59 (96.72) | 52 (85.25) | ||
Yes | 6 (3.97) | 24 (18.32) | 2 (3.28) | 9 (14.75) | ||
Hospital day after surgery (d) | 9.96 ± 6.36 | 13.06 ± 11.09 | < 0.001 | 9.62 ± 5.32 | 13.51 ± 10.67 | < 0.001 |
Pick of pain score (VAS) | 4 (3.92) | 5 (2.51) | 0.494 | 3 (3.16) | 1 (1.05) | 0.317 |
Pain score at postoperative day | 3.19 ± 1.04 | 3.83 ± 1.14 | < 0.001 | 3.23 ± 1.09 | 4.07 ± 1.35 | < 0.001 |
Pain score at postoperative day 1 | 2.98 ± 1.07 | 3.76 ± 1.13 | < 0.001 | 2.97 ± 0.87 | 3.77 ± 1.07 | < 0.001 |
Pain score at postoperative day 3 | 2.68 ± 1.17 | 3.10 ± 1.28 | < 0.001 | 2.75 ± 1.31 | 3.16 ± 1.27 | < 0.001 |
Pain score at postoperative day 5 | 1.93 ± 1.13 | 2.61 ± 1.49 | < 0.001 | 1.82 ± 1.13 | 2.64 ± 1.21 | < 0.001 |
Administration of analgesics (n) | 9.74 ± 8.92 | 16.22 ± 18.06 | < 0.001 | 10.61 ± 11.07 | 16.92 ± 13.72 | < 0.001 |
Administration of opioid (n) | 2.89 ± 5.49 | 5.43 ± 11.51 | < 0.001 | 3.21 ± 6.98 | 4.48 ± 5.15 | 0.031 |
Retrieved LN | 39.53 ± 15.59 | 41.03 ± 15.31 | 0.265 | 38.67 ± 13.82 | 38.13 ± 14.52 | 0.713 |
Table 3 Postoperative complications
Variable | Total set (n = 282) | P value | PSM set (1:1) (n = 122) | P value | ||
TLTG (n = 151) | OTG (n = 131) | TLTG (n = 61) | OTG (n = 61) | |||
Early complications | ||||||
No | 119 (78.81) | 99 (75.57) | 0.518 | 48 (78.69) | 43 (70.49) | 0.317 |
Yes | 32 (21.19) | 32 (24.43) | 13 (21.31) | 18 (29.51) | ||
Late complications | ||||||
No | 142 (94.04) | 125 (95.42) | 0.607 | 56 (91.80) | 59 (96.72) | 0.257 |
Yes | 9 (5.96) | 6 (4.58) | 5 (8.20) | 2 (3.28) | ||
CDC | 0.426 | 0.564 | ||||
0-2 | 138 (91.39) | 116 (88.55) | 56 (91.80) | 54 (88.52) | ||
≥ 3 | 13 (8.61) | 15 (11.45) | 5 (8.20) | 7 (11.48) | ||
EJ related complications | 0.090 | 0.270 | ||||
No | 148 (98.01) | 123 (93.89) | 59 (96.72) | 56 (91.80) | ||
Yes | 3 (1.99) | 8 (6.11) | 2 (3.28) | 5 (8.20) |
Table 4 Characteristics of the patients with esophagojejunostomy-related complications
Case | Sex | Age | Primary operation | TNMstage | Early or late | Type of complication | CDC | Treatment | Hospital day |
1 | F | 79 | TLTG | III | Early | Bleeding | 5 | Operation | 8 |
2 | M | 65 | TLTG | II | Early | Leakage | 3A | Intervention | 20 |
3 | M | 74 | OTG | I | Early | Leakage | 2 | Conservative | 14 |
4 | M | 74 | OTG | I | Early | Bleeding | 3A | Intervention | 72 |
5 | M | 60 | OTG | I | Early | Leakage | 3A | Intervention | 48 |
6 | M | 66 | OTG | I | Early | Leakage | 2 | Conservative | 25 |
7 | M | 63 | OTG | I | Early | Leakage | 3A | Intervention | 32 |
Table 5 Univariate analysis of risk factors for overall early, Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ 3, and esophagojejunostomy-related complications
Variables | Early complications | CDC ≥ 3 complications | EJ-related complications | |||
OR (95%CI) | P value | OR (95%CI) | P value | OR (95%CI) | P value | |
Type of surgery | 0.518 | 0.428 | 0.090 | |||
TLTG | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
OTG | 1.202 (0.688-2.100) | 1.373 (0.628-3.002) | 3.209 (0.833–12.356) | |||
Age | 0.289 | 0.051 | 0.035 | |||
< 60 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
≥ 60 | 1.358 (0.772-2.390) | 2.347 (0.997-5.525) | 9.220 (1.164-73.022) | |||
BMI | 0.045 | 0.380 | 0.402 | |||
< 25 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
≥ 25 | 1.773 (1.012-3.109) | 1.419 (0.649-3.101) | 1.678 (0.500-5.633) | |||
ASA score | 0.030 | 0.036 | ||||
1-2 | 1 | 1 | ||||
3 | 3.224 (1.122-9.265) | 3.682 (1.088-12.456) | ||||
Number of comorbidities | 0.342 | 0.752 | ||||
0-2 | 1 | 1 | ||||
> 2 | 1.631 (0.594-4.480) | 1.406 (0.170-11.599) | ||||
Combined operation | 0.685 | 0.381 | 0.735 | |||
No | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
Yes | 0.833 (0.346-2.008) | 0.515 (0.117-2.272) | 0.697 (0.086-5.618) | |||
History of abdominal surgery | 0.130 | 0.323 | ||||
No | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
Yes | 1.640 (0.864-3.111) | 1.554 (0.648-3.726) | 1.408 (0.362-5.478) | 0.622 | ||
Tumor size | 0.521 | 0.442 | 0.053 | |||
< 5 cm | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
≥ 5 cm | 0.830 (0.470-1.466) | 0.521 | 0.727 (0.323-1.638) | 3.786 (0.983-14.585) | ||
Operation time | 0.225 | 0.605 | 0.805 | |||
< 150 min | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
≥ 150 min | 1.414 (0.808-2.477) | 1.230 (0.562-2.692) | 1.165 (0.347-3.912) | |||
Retrieved lymph node | 0.714 | 0.662 | 0.246 | |||
< 30 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
≥ 30 | 0.888 (0.471-1.676) | 1.235 (0.480-3.181) | 3.416 (0.429-27.170) | |||
Pathologic tumor stage | 0.418 | 0.864 | 0.875 | |||
I | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
II | 0.666 (0.328-1.351) | 1.246 (0.497-3.126) | 0.701 (0.138-3.568) | |||
III | 0.704 (0.346-1.431) | 0.950 (0.348-2.592) | 1.119 (0.27-4.617) |
Table 6 Multivariate analysis of risk factors for early, Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ 3, and esophagojejunostomy-related complications
Variables | Early complications | CDC ≥ 3 complications | EJ related complications | |||
OR (95%CI) | P value | OR (95%CI) | P value | OR (95%CI) | P value | |
Type of surgery | ||||||
TLTG | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
OTG | 1.275 (0.719-2.262) | 0.405 | 1.431 (0.650-3.153) | 0.373 | 3.546 (0.908-13.854) | 0.069 |
Age | ||||||
< 60 | 1 | 1 | ||||
≥ 60 | 2.391 (1.013-5.641) | 0.047 | 9.925 (1.245-79.107) | 0.030 | ||
BMI | ||||||
< 25 | 1 | |||||
≥ 25 | 1.824 (1.029-3.234) | 0.040 | ||||
ASA score | ||||||
1-2 | 1 | |||||
3 | 3.154 (1.084-9.174) | 0.035 |
- Citation: Ko CS, Choi NR, Kim BS, Yook JH, Kim MJ, Kim BS. Totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy using the modified overlap method and conventional open total gastrectomy: A comparative study. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27(18): 2193-2204
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v27/i18/2193.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i18.2193