Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28, 2020; 26(40): 6163-6181
Published online Oct 28, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i40.6163
Published online Oct 28, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i40.6163
Table 1 Features of ultrasonography which help in differentiation of benign and malignant gallbladder wall thickening
USG features | Benign wall thickening | Malignant wall thickening |
Type of thickening | Diffuse and symmetric | Diffuse/focal and asymmetric |
Mucosa | Intact | Discontinuous |
Layered pattern of GB wall | Preserved | Lost |
Color doppler findings | Low mean flow velocity and peak systolic velocity | High mean flow velocity and peak systolic velocity |
Shear wave elastography parameters | Low shear wave velocity | High shear wave velocity |
Table 2 Features of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography which help in differentiation of benign and malignant gallbladder wall thickening
Benign wall thickening | Malignant wall thickening | |
Type of enhancement | Homogenous arterial phase enhancement | Non-homogenous arterial phase enhancement |
Pattern of vascularization | Branched or tortuous intralesional vascularity | Dotted intralesional vascularity |
Dynamic change of enhancement | Washout time > 40 s | Washout time < 40 s |
Infiltration into liver parenchyma | Absent | Present |
Table 3 Features of computed tomography which help in differentiation of benign and malignant gallbladder wall thickening
CT findings | Benign wall thickening | Malignant wall thickening |
Patterns of enhancement | Single layer: Homogenous enhancement; two layered patterns: Inner layer isoattenuating to liver | Single layer: Strongly heterogeneously enhancing; two layered patterns: Inner layer enhancing in arterial phase and isoattenuating in venous phase |
Biliary obstruction | Not seen | More likely to be seen |
Regional lymphadenopathy | Not present | Present |
Infiltration into liver | Not seen | May be present |
Table 4 Features of magnetic resonance imaging which help in differentiation of benign and malignant gallbladder wall thickening
MRI findings | Benign wall thickening | Malignant wall thickening |
Pattern of thickening | On T2, thin hypointense inner layer and thick hyperintense outer layer or multiple T2 hyperintense foci in wall | Diffuse nodular thickening without layering |
Dynamic contrast enhancement | Relatively slow enhancement | Early enhancement |
Diffusion restriction | High ADC value and low lesion to spinal cord ratio | Low ADC value and high lesion to spinal cord ratio |
Table 5 Rare causes of gallbladder wall thickening and their imaging findings
Cause | CT findings |
Tuberculosis | (1) micronodular type: Micronodular or polypoidal lesions in GB wall; (2) thickened wall type: Most common. Diffuse or focal, nonspecific, homogeneous, or heterogeneous enhancement. Halo of edema may be present; and (3) mass-forming type: Large mass with multicentric necrosis and foci of calcification |
Primary lymphoma | (1) high grade: Solid and bulky mass in the GB fossa or marked GB wall thickening; (2) low grade: Mild GB wall thickening with intact mucosa |
Neuroendocrine tumor | Most common as mass replacing GB with well-defined margins and intact mucosa as compared to GBC. Arterial hyperenhancement. More extensive and bulky lymph node and hepatic metastasis compared to GBC |
- Citation: Gupta P, Marodia Y, Bansal A, Kalra N, Kumar-M P, Sharma V, Dutta U, Sandhu MS. Imaging-based algorithmic approach to gallbladder wall thickening. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(40): 6163-6181
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v26/i40/6163.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i40.6163