Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2020; 26(23): 3293-3303
Published online Jun 21, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i23.3293
Table 1 List of panel members
NameInstitute
Dietmar ÖfnerMedical University of Innsbruck, Austria
Robin McLeodUniversity of Toronto, Canada
Zhou-Qiao WuPeking University Cancer Hospital, China
Ismail GögenurZealand University Hospital, Centre for surgical Science, Denmark
Lars Nannestad JørgensenDigestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Yves PanisBeaujon Hospital, Paris, France
Pablo Ortega-DeballonUniversity Hospital of Dijon, France
Markus BüchlerUniversity of Heidelberg, Germany
Gianluca PellinoUniversità degli Studi della Campania ''Luigi Vanvitelli'', Italy
Harry van GoorRadboud University Medical Center, The Netherlands
Adam DzikiMedical University of Lodz, Poland
Eduardo García-GraneroHospital La Fe, University of Valencia, Spain
Martin RutegårdUmea University, Sweden
Ignazio TarantinoKantonsspital St. Gallen, Switzerland
Steven D WexnerCleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, United States
Michael StamosUniversity of California, Irvine, CA, United States
John AlverdyUniversity of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
James KinrossImperial college London, United Kingdom
Dermot BurkeLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom
Table 2 Summary of the consensus on the definition of colorectal anastomotic leakage after two rounds
CategoryConsensus
Clinical parametersTachycardia, clinical deterioration, abdominal pain, discharge from abdominal drain, discharge from rectum, rectovaginal fistula and anastomotic defect found by digital examination contribute to the suspicion of CAL
Laboratory testsCRP and the combination of CRP and leukocytosis contribute to the suspicion of CAL; Albumin, urea and creatinine do not contribute to the suspicion of CAL
Radiological findingsExtravasation of endoluminal administrated contrast, collection around the anastomosis, presacral abscess near anastomosis, perianastomotic air and free intra-abdominal air are defined as CAL on CT-scan
Findings during reoperationNecrosis of anastomosis, necrosis of blind loop, signs of peritonitis and dehiscence of anastomosis are defined as CAL during reoperation
Grading systemsGrading or classifying CAL is important; Both the ISREC-classification and Clavien-Dindo classification are suitable
TimingDistinction between early and late anastomosis should be made; There should not be a fixed range of days in which CAL can occur to define it as CAL
Colon/rectumColon and rectum should be seen as separate entities
Table 3 Recommendations final round
CategoryRecommendation
General definitionThe ISREC definition of CAL is used by the majority of the participants (71%)
Clinical parametersTachycardia, clinical deterioration, abdominal pain other than wound pain, discharge from the abdominal drain, discharge from the rectum, rectovaginal fistula and anastomotic defect found by digital examination are clinical symptoms that contribute to the suspicion of CAL
Laboratory testsCRP and the combination of CRP and leukocytosis are appropriate laboratory tests and should be tested if there is a suspicion of CAL. Albumin, urea and creatinine do not contribute to the suspicion of CAL and therefore should not be tested
Radiological findingsExtravasation of endoluminal administrated contrast, collection around the anastomosis, presacral abscess near the anastomosis, perianastomotic air and free intra-abdominal air should be defined as CAL on CT-scan. However, defining free intra-abdominal air as CAL depends on the amount of post-operative days
Findings during reoperationNecrosis of the anastomosis, necrosis of the blind loop, signs of peritonitis and dehiscence of the anastomosis should all be defined as CAL when observed during reoperation
Grading systemsIt is important to grade or classify CAL. Both the ISREC-classification and Clavien-Dindo classification are appropriate grading systems
TimingDistinction between early and late anastomotic leakage should be made. There should not be a fixed range of days in which CAL can occur to define it as CAL
Colon/rectumColonic anastomotic leakage and rectal anastomotic leakage should be seen as two separate problems, based on different incidence rates, different anatomy, different surgical technique