Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 21, 2020; 26(15): 1708-1725
Published online Apr 21, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i15.1708
Published online Apr 21, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i15.1708
Table 1 Technologies for detection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Technology | Quantitative | Qualitative | Advantages | Disadvantage | Ref. |
Endoscopy | - | + | (1) Obvious observation of esophageal mucosal changes, lesion changes, and lesion size and morphology; and (2) Low false negative rate and false positive rate | (1) Invasiveness; (2) Easy to cause complications such as sore throat after examination; and (3) High cost | [15,16] |
Blood-based biomarker | + | + | (1) Non-invasive; (2) Easy to operate; (3) Low cost; (4) Suitable as a screening tool; and (5) Identification of asymptomatic patients at risk | High false Negative rate and false positive rate | [16-18] |
Table 2 Diagnostic performance of tumor-associated autoantibodies in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Target antigen of autoanti-body | Ref. | Year of publication | ESCC, n | Controls, n | All stages/early stage | P value | Detection method | ||
Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | AUC | |||||||
p53 | Zhang et al[38] | 2016 | 324 (Training) | 324 (Training) | 55.9/- | 89.5/- | 0.784/- | < 0.001 | ELISA |
186 (Validation) | 186 (Validation) | < 0.001 | ELISA | ||||||
Xu et al[39] | 2014 | 388 (Test) | 125 (Test) | 30.0/- | 98.0/- | < 0.0001 | ELISA | ||
237 (Validation) | 134 (Validation) | 29.0/- | 97.0/- | < 0.0001 | ELISA | ||||
Qin et al[40] | 2014 | 174 | 242 | 21.8/- | 96.3/- | 0.6/- | < 0.05 | ELISA | |
Chai et al[41] | 2014 | 157 | 85 | 22.9/- | 100/- | < 0.01 | ELISA | ||
Zhou et al[42] | 2014 | 88 | 200 | 22.0/- | 98.0/- | < 0.01 | ELISA | ||
Cai et al[43] | 2008 | 46 | 30 | 39.1/22.2 | 100/100 | < 0.001 | ELISA | ||
Looi et al[44] | 2006 | 71 | 82 | 7.0/- | 98.8/- | < 0.05 | ELISA | ||
Müller et al[45] | 2006 | 50 | 436 | 20.0/- | 100/- | < 0.05 | Western blot | ||
Megliorino et al[46] | 2005 | 77 | 82 | 14.3/- | 97.6/- | < 0.01 | ELISA | ||
Shimada et al[47] | 2003 | 301 | 205 | 30.0/- | 95.5/- | < 0.05 | ELISA | ||
Shimada et al[48] | 2002 | 105 | 153 | 26.7/20.0 | 95.5/95.5 | < 0.001 | ELISA | ||
Ralhan et al[49] | 2000 | 60 | 50 | 60.0/- | 92.0/- | < 0.05 | ELISA | ||
Shimada et al[50] | 2000 | 35 | 69 | 40.0/- | 100/- | < 0.001 | ELISA | ||
Hagiwara et al[51] | 2000 | 46 | 13 | 28.0/28.6 | 100/100 | < 0.05 | ELISA | ||
Shimada et al[52] | 1998 | 57 | 208 | 58.0/- | 99.0/- | < 0.05 | ELISA | ||
Sobti et al[53] | 1998 | 20 | 20 | 30.0/- | 100/- | 0.02 | ELISA | ||
Cawley et al[54] | 1998 | 23 | 19 | 34.8/- | 94.7/- | 0.037 | ELISA | ||
p16 | Zhang et al[38] | 2016 | 324 (Training) | 324 (Training) | 29.3/- | 81.8/- | 0.60/- | < 0.001 | ELISA |
186 (Validation) | 186 (Validation) | < 0.01 | |||||||
Jin et al[55] | 2015 | 88 | 208 | 0.05 | ELISA | ||||
Qin et al[40] | 2014 | 174 | 242 | 18.4/- | 98.8/- | 0.6/- | < 0.05 | ELISA | |
Zhou et al[42] | 2014 | 88 | 200 | 11.0/- | 97.0/- | 0.004 | ELISA | ||
Looi et al[44] | 2006 | 71 | 82 | 14.1/- | 98.8/- | < 0.05 | ELISA | ||
c-Myc | Zhang et al[38] | 2016 | 324 (Training) | 324 (Training) | 49.1/- | 81.5/- | 0.699/- | < 0.001 | ELISA |
186 (Validation) | 186 (Validation) | < 0.001 | ELISA | ||||||
Qin et al[40] | 2014 | 174 | 242 | 15.5/- | 98.8/- | 0.6/- | < 0.05 | ELISA | |
Zhou et al[42] | 2014 | 88 | 200 | 18.0/- | 96.0/- | < 0.001 | ELISA | ||
Looi et al[44] | 2006 | 71 | 82 | 7.0/- | 100/- | < 0.05 | ELISA | ||
Megliorino et al[46] | 2005 | 77 | 82 | 11.7/- | 100/- | < 0.01 | ELISA | ||
Survivin | Xiu et al[56] | 2018 | 159 | 362 | 14.5/- | 90.0/- | 0.327/- | 0.524 | ELISA |
Qin et al[40] | 2014 | 174 | 242 | 12.1/- | 99.6/- | < 0.05 | ELISA | ||
Zhou et al[42] | 2014 | 88 | 200 | 9.0/- | 96.0/- | 0.06 | ELISA | ||
Megliorino et al[46] | 2005 | 77 | 82 | 10.4/- | 97.6/- | < 0.05 | ELISA | ||
NY-ESO-1 | Oshima et al[57] | 2016 | 172 | 74 | 32.0/16.0 | 100/100 | < 0.001 | ELISA | |
Xu et al[39] | 2014 | 388 (Test) | 125 (Test) | 26.0/- | 100/- | < 0.0001 | ELISA | ||
237 (Validation) | 134 (Validation) | 24.0/- | 99.0/- | < 0.0001 | ELISA | ||||
Fujita et al[58] | 2004 | 51 | 29 | 3.9/- | 100/- | 0.532 | ELISA | ||
Hsp 70 | Xu et al[39] | 2014 | 388 (Test) | 125 (Test) | 11.0/- | 99.0/- | < 0.001 | ELISA | |
237 (Validation) | 134 (Validation) | 8.0/- | 99.0/- | < 0.01 | ELISA | ||||
Zhang et al[59] | 2011 | 69 | 76 | 39.1/- | 92.3/- | > 0.01 | ELISA | ||
Fujita et al[60] | 2008 | 16 | 13 | 93.7/- | 100/- | < 0.001 | ELISA |
Table 3 Diagnostic performance of microRNAs in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
MicroRNA | Ref. | Year of publication | ESCC, n | Controls, n | All stages/early stage | P value | Detection method | ||
Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | AUC | |||||||
miR-21 | Wang et al[76] | 2018 | 31 | 32 | 71.0/- | 96.9/- | 0.88/- | < 0.001 | qRT-PCR |
Sharma et al[77] | 2018 | 24 | 21 | 83.3/- | 57.2/- | 0.692/- | 0.027 | qRT-PCR | |
Zhang et al[78] | 2018 | 125 | 125 | 74.0/- | 78.0/- | 0.80/0.86 | < 0.001 | RT-qPCR | |
Lv et al[79] | 2016 | 126 | 80 | 0.796/ 0.812 | 0.021 | qRT-PCR | |||
Li et al[80] | 2015 | 38 | 19 | 0.690/- | 0.017 | qRT-PCR | |||
Ye et al[81] | 2014 | 100 | 50 | /97.0 | /56.0 | /0.837 | < 0.001 | qRT-PCR | |
Kurashige et al[82] | 2012 | 71 | 39 | < 0.001 | qRT-PCR | ||||
Wang et al[83] | 2012 | 174 | 39 | 71.0/- | 69.2/- | 0.740/- | < 0.001 | qRT-PCR | |
Komatsu et al[84] | 2011 | 50 | 20 | 0.618/- | 0.022 | qRT-PCR | |||
miR-223 | Zhang et al[78] | 2017 | 125 | 125 | 0.68/- | 0.68/- | 0.73/0.83 | < 0.001 | RT-qPCR |
Zhou et al[85] | 2017 | 137 | 155 | 0.649/- | < 0.001 | RT-qPCR | |||
Wu et al[86] | 2014 | 194 | 98 | 0.734/- | 0.001 | RT-qPCR | |||
Wu et al[87] | 2014 | 20 (Test) | 20 (Validation) | 0.90/- | < 0.001 | RT-qPCR | |||
63 (Test) | 63 (Validation) | 0.77/- | < 0.001 | RT-qPCR | |||||
Zhang et al[73] | 2010 | 149 | 100 | 83.2/- | 83.0/- | 0.911/- | < 0.05 | RT-qPCR | |
miR-375 | Zhang et al[78] | 2017 | 125 | 125 | 0.78/- | 0.59/- | 0.69/0.87 | < 0.001 | RT-qPCR |
Lv et al[79] | 2016 | 126 | 80 | 0.712/ 0.739 | 0.023 | qRT-PCR | |||
Li et al[80] | 2015 | 38 | 19 | 0.921/- | < 0.0001 | qRT-PCR | |||
Wu et al[86] | 2014 | 194 | 98 | 0.720/- | 0.007 | RT-qPCR | |||
Komatsu et al[84] | 2011 | 50 | 20 | 0.807/- | 0.005 | qRT-PCR | |||
miR-25 | Wang et al[76] | 2018 | 31 | 32 | 71.0/- | 68.8/- | 0.72/- | < 0.001 | qRT-PCR |
Zhang et al[78] | 2017 | 125 | 125 | 0.54/- | 0.57/- | 0.55/- | 0.025 | RT-qPCR | |
Wu et al[87] | 2014 | 20 (Test) | 20 (Validation) | 0.94/- | < 0.001 | RT-qPCR | |||
63 (Test) | 63 (Validation) | 0.78/- | < 0.001 | RT-qPCR | |||||
Wu et al[86] | 2014 | 194 | 98 | 47.1/- | 71.6/- | 0.593/- | 0.009 | RT-qPCR | |
Komatsu et al[88] | 2014 | 20 | 50 | 85.0/- | 86.0/- | 0.856/- | < 0.0001 | RT-qPCR | |
miR-100 | Zhang et al[78] | 2017 | 125 | 125 | 0.58/- | 0.58/- | 0.58/0.79 | 0.164 | RT-qPCR |
Wu et al[87] | 2014 | 20 (Test) | 20 (Validation) | 0.88/- | < 0.001 | RT-qPCR | |||
63 (Test) | 63 (Validation) | 0.75/- | < 0.001 | RT-qPCR | |||||
Zhang et al[73] | 2010 | 149 | 100 | 63.8/- | 81.0/- | 0.817/- | < 0.05 | RT-qPCR |
Table 4 Diagnostic performance of long non-coding RNAs in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
LncRNA | Ref. | Year of publication | ESCC, n | Controls, n | All stages/early stage | P value | Detection method | ||
Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | AUC | |||||||
POU3F3 | Hu et al[102] | 2016 | 205 | 210 | 0.584/- | < 0.01 | qRT-PCR | ||
Tong et al[103] | 2015 | 147 | 123 | 72.8/69.2 | 89.4/- | 0.842/- | < 0.001 | qPCR | |
HOTAIR | Wang et al[104] | 2017 | 50 | 20 | 56.0/- | 90.0/- | 0.793/- | < 0.01 | qRT-PCR |
HNF1A-AS1 | Tong et al[103] | 2015 | 147 | 123 | 32.7/- | 0.781/- | < 0.001 | qPCR | |
SPRY4-IT1 | Tong et al[103] | 2015 | 147 | 123 | 48.2/- | 0.800/- | < 0.001 | qPCR | |
linc00152 | Hu et al[102] | 2016 | 205 | 210 | 0.698/- | < 0.01 | qRT-PCR | ||
CFLAR-AS1 | Hu et al[102] | 2016 | 205 | 210 | 0.651/- | < 0.01 | qRT-PCR | ||
PGM5-AS1 | Zhihua et al[105] | 2019 | 41 | 26 | 0.894/- | < 0.001 | qRT-PCR |
Table 5 Diagnostic performance of cytokines in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Cytokine | Ref. | Year of publication | ESCC, n | Controls, n | All stages/early stage | P value | Detection method | ||
Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | AUC | |||||||
VEGF-A | Kozłowski et al[139] | 2013 | 89 | 30 | 83.0/- | 70.0/- | 0.865/- | < 0.001 | ELISA |
Krzystek-Korpacka et al[140] | 2008 | 70 | 42 | 72.5/- | 66.0/- | 0.739/- | < 0.001 | ELISA | |
Krzystek-Korpacka et al[141] | 2007 | 70 | 47 | 70.0/- | 81.0/- | 0.837/- | < 0.001 | ELISA | |
Ren et al[142] | 2005 | 72 | 15 | < 0.001 | ELISA | ||||
Shimada et al[143] | 2001 | 96 | 24 | 79.0/- | 48.0/- | 0.001 | ELISA | ||
VEGF-C | Kozlowski et al[144] | 2010 | 110 | 30 | 60.0/- | 80.0/- | < 0.001 | ELISA | |
Krzystek-Korpacka et al[140] | 2008 | 70 | 42 | 78.6/- | 76.6/- | 0.841/- | < 0.001 | ELISA | |
IL-8 | Tong et al[145] | 2018 | 10 | 10 | < 0.05 | ELISA | |||
Krzystek-Korpacka et al[140] | 2008 | 70 | 42 | 77.1/- | 74.4/- | 0.782/- | < 0.001 | ELISA | |
Ren et al[146] | 2005 | 149 | 35 | < 0.001 | ELISA | ||||
Ren et al[142] | 2005 | 72 | 15 | < 0.001 | ELISA | ||||
IL-6 | Tong et al[145] | 2018 | 10 | 10 | < 0.05 | ELISA | |||
Łukaszewicz-Zając et al[147] | 2011 | 30 | 90 | 87.0/- | 92.0/- | 0.924/- | < 0.001 | ELISA |
- Citation: Chu LY, Peng YH, Weng XF, Xie JJ, Xu YW. Blood-based biomarkers for early detection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(15): 1708-1725
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v26/i15/1708.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i15.1708