Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2019; 25(9): 1142-1157
Published online Mar 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1142
Table 1 Meta-analyses included for induction of clinical remission in Crohn’s disease
StudyInterventionComparatorFollow-upnInduction of clinical remission, RR (95%CI)Quality of evidence
Chande et al[23]AZA or 6-MPPlacebo6 wk-9 mo380RR 1.23 (0.97-1.55)1Moderate
AZA or 6-MPMTX6 wk-9 mo143RR 1.13 (0.85-1.49)1Low
AZA or 6-MP5-ASA6 wk-9 mo156RR 1.24 (0.80-1.91)1Very low
AZAIFX26 wk399RR 0.66 (0.51-0.87)1Moderate
Table 2 Meta-analyses included for induction of clinical remission in ulcerative colitis
StudyInterventionComparatorFollow-upnInduction of clinical remission, RR (95%CI) or OR (95%CI)Quality of evidence
Chande et al[24]MTXPlacebo36 wk67RR 0.96 (0.58-1.59)1Low
MTX6-MP30 wk26RR 0.74 (0.43-1.29)2Very low
MTX5-ASA30 wk20RR 2.33 (0.66-3.64) 2Very low
Baumgart et al[25]TacrolimusPlacebo2 wk63OR 2.27 (0.35-14.75)3High
Lasa et al[26]TacrolimusPlacebo12 wk127RR 0.91 (0.82-1.00)4High
Table 3 Meta-analyses included for maintenance of clinical remission in ulcerative colitis
StudyInterventionComparatorFollow-upnMaintenance of clinical remission, RR (95%CI)Quality of evidence
Wang et al[27]MTXPlacebo36 wk32RR 0.64 (0.28-1.45)1Low
MTX5-ASA76 wk9RR 1.12 (0.06-20.71)2Very low
MTX6-MP76 wk18RR 0.22 (0.03-1.45)2Very low
Table 4 Meta-analyses included for induction of clinical response in Crohn’s disease
StudyInterventionComparatorFollow-upnClinical response, RR (95%CI)Quality of evidence
Chande et al[23]AZA or 6-MPPlacebo6 wk-9 mo434RR 1.26 (0.98-1.62)1Moderate
Table 5 Meta-analyses included for induction of clinical response in ulcerative colitis
StudyInterventionComparatorFollow-upnClinical response, RR (95%CI) or OR (95%CI)Quality of evidence
Komaki et al[28]TacrolimusPlacebo2 wks (RCT)103RR 4.61 (2.09-10.17)1High
Baumgart et al[25]TacrolimusPlacebo2 wk63OR 8.66 (1.79-42.00)2High
Lasa et al[26]TacrolimusPlacebo12 wk127RR 0.58 (0.45-0.73)3High
Narula et al[29]IFXCyclosporine3 mo (RCT)41243.8% (IFX); 41.7% (C) OR 1.08 (0.73-1.60)4Low
IFXCyclosporine3 mo (non RCT)80174.8% (IFX); 55.4% (C) OR 2.96 (2.12-4.14)5Very low
Table 6 Meta-analyses included for induction of mucosal healing in Crohn’s disease
StudyInterventionComparatorFollow-upnMucosal healing, RR (95%CI)Quality of evidence
Chande et al[23]AZAIFX26 wk214RR 0.55 (0.33-0.94)1Moderate
Table 7 Meta-analyses included for induction of mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis
StudyInterventionComparatorFollow-upnMucosal healing, RR (95% CI)Quality of evidence
Lasa et al[26]TacrolimusPlacebo12 wk127RR 0.59 (0.46-0.74)1High
Table 8 Meta-analyses included for inflammatory bowel disease-related surgeries in ulcerative colitis
StudyInterventionComparatorFollow-upNColectomy rate %, or OR (95% CI)Quality of evidence
Komaki et al[28]TacrolimusPlacebo2 wk (RCT)1030%High
Narula et al[29]IFXCyclosporine3 mo (RCT)38526.6% (IFX); 26.4% (C) OR 1.00 (0.64-1.59)Low
IFXCyclosporine3 mo (non RCT)47824.1% (IFX); 42.5% (C) OR 0.53 (0.22-1.28)Very low
IFXCyclosporine12 mo (RCT)41534.4% (IFX); 40.8% (C) OR 0.76 (0.51-1.14)Low
IFXCyclosporine12 mo (non RCT)85420.7% (IFX); 36.8% (C) OR 0.42 (0.22-0.83)Very low
Table 9 Individual studies included for induction of clinical remission in Crohn’s disease
StudyCountryInterventionComparatorStudy designFollow-upnInduction of clinical remission
Thomsen et al[45]Denmark, France, United Kingdom, Norway, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Greece, South Africa, Austria, Australia, and IrelandBudesonideMesalamineRCT8 wk18269% (budesonide) 45% (mesalamine) (P = 0.001)1
BudesonideMesalamineRCT16 wk18262% (budesonide) 36% (mesalamine) (P < 0.001)1
Pavez et al[41]ChileIFXAZARCT26 wk5080.44 (event rate IFX); 0.3 (event rate AZA)2
Table 10 Individual studies included for induction of clinical remission in ulcerative colitis
StudyCountryInterventionComparatorStudy designFollow-upnInduction of clinical remission
Schmidt et al[30]GermanyTacrolimus-Retrospective cohort24 mo5851%1
Tacrolimus with purine analogues-Retrospective cohort24 mo7982%1
Llaó et al[31]SpainIV corticosteroids-Retrospective cohort3 d11052%2
IV corticosteroids-Retrospective cohort7 d11075% 2
Campbell et al[35]UKCyclosporine-Retrospective cohortAcute phase7674%3
Sood et al[33]IndiaAZAPlaceboRCT1 yr8356% (AZA); 40% (placebo)4
Prieux-Klotz et al[37]FranceAZA or 6-MPRetrospective cohort38 mo8061.2%5
Yamamoto et al[38]JapanTacrolimusAnti-TNFRetrospective12 wk10040% (tacrolimus); 28% (anti-TNF); P = 0.296
Ogata et al[39]JapanTacrolimusPlaceboRCT2 wk629.4% (tacrolimus); 0% (placebo); P = 0.2387
TacrolimusPlaceboRCT12 wk2128.6% (tacrolimus)7
Hyde et al[44]United KingdomHydrocortisone-Retrospective cohort5 d21661%8
Cyclosporine-Retrospective cohort4.5 d5056%8
Kjeldsen et al[43]DenmarkPrednisolone-Retrospective cohort6 wk5147% (severe disease); 80% (moderate disease)9
Meyers et al[42]United StatesACTHHydrocortisoneRCT10 d6644% (ACTH); 41% (Hydrocortisone)10
Table 11 Individual studies included for maintenance of clinical remission in ulcerative colitis
StudyCountryInterventionComparatorStudy designFollow-upnMaintenance of clinical remission
Sood et al[32]IndiaAZA-Retrospective cohort12 mo11191%1
AZA-Retrospective cohort24 moN/A88%1
AZA-Retrospective cohort36 moN/A76%1
AZA-Retrospective cohort48 moN/A53%1
AZA-Retrospective cohort60 moN/A38%1
Campbell et al[35]United KingdomCyclosporine-Retrospective cohort1 yr7635%2
Cyclosporine-Retrospective cohort3 yrN/A10%2
Arts et al[36]BelgiumCyclosporine-Retrospective cohort1 yr3427.8%3
Cyclosporine-Retrospective cohort3 yr550%3
Hyde et al[44]United KingdomCyclosporine-Retrospective cohort19 mo5040%4
Meyers et al[42]United StatesACTHHydrocortisoneRCT1 yr6637.5% (ACTH); 23.5% (hydrocortisone)5
Table 12 Individual studies included for induction or maintenance of clinical response in Crohn’s disease
StudyCountryInterventionComparatorStudy designFollow-upnClinical response
Chun et al[46]United StatesACTHHydrocortisoneRCT10 d8882% (ACTH; 67%-92%); 93% (hydrocortisone; 84%-99%)1
Table 13 Individual studies included for induction or maintenance of clinical response in ulcerative colitis
StudyCountryInterventionComparatorStudy designFollow-upnClinical response
Arts et al[36]BelgiumCyclosporine-Retrospective cohort9 d8683.7%1
Prieux-Klotz et al[37]FranceAZA or 6-MP-Retrospective cohort38 mo8070%2
Yamamoto et al[38]JapanTacrolimusAnti-TNFRetrospective12 wk10062% (tacrolimus); 64% (anti-TNF); P > 0.993
Ogata et al[39]JapanTacrolimusPlaceboRCT2 wk6250% (tacrolimus); 13.3% (placebo); P = 0.0034
Van Assche et al[48]BelgiumCyclosporine 4 mg/kgCyclosporine 2 mg/kgRCT2 wk7384.2% (4 mg/kg); 85.7% (2 mg/kg)5
Oshitani et al[47]JapanPrednisoloneMethylprednisoloneRetrospective cohort7-14 d7182% (prednisolone); 82% (methylprednisolone)6
Table 14 Individual studies included for mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis
StudyCountryInterventionComparatorStudy designFollow-upNMucosal healing
Prieux-Klotz et al[37]FranceAZA or 6-MP-Retrospective cohort38 mo8043.7%1
Yamamoto et al[38]JapanTacrolimusAnti-TNFRetrospective12 wk7332% (tacrolimus); 28% (anti-TNF); P = 0.862
Ogata et al[39]JapanTacrolimusPlaceboRCT2 wk6243.8% (tacrolimus); 13.3% (placebo); P = 0.0123
TacrolimusPlaceboRCT12 wk2185.7% (tacrolimus)3
Oshitani et al[47]JapanPrednisoloneMethylprednisoloneRetrospective cohort6 wk7178% (prednisolone); 82% (methylprednisolone)4
Table 15 Individual studies included for surgeries related to Crohn’s disease
StudyCountryInterventionComparatorStudy designFollow-upnColectomy
Chun et al[46]United StatesACTHHydrocortisoneRCT3 yr8828% (both groups)
Table 16 Individual studies included for surgeries related to ulcerative colitis
StudyCountryInterventionComparatorStudy designFollow-upnColectomy
Schmidt et al[30]GermanyTacrolimus-Retrospective cohort24 mo5822%
Tacrolimus with purine analogues-Retrospective cohort24 mo7918%
Llaó et al[31]SpainIV corticosteroids-Retrospective cohort7 d11015%
Moskovitz et al[34]BelgiumCyclosporine-Retrospective cohort9.3 d14216.9%
Cyclosporine-Retrospective cohort1 yrN/A37%
Cyclosporine-Retrospective cohort4 yrN/A59%
Cyclosporine-Retrospective cohort6 yrN/A84%
Cyclosporine-Retrospective cohort7 yrN/A88%
Campbell et al[35]UKCyclosporine-Retrospective cohort7 yr58%
Arts et al[36]BelgiumCyclosporine-Retrospective cohort9 d8616.3%
Cyclosporine-Retrospective cohort1 yr4536%
Cyclosporine-Retrospective cohort3 yr1345%
Yamamoto et al[38]JapanTacrolimusAnti-TNFRetrospective12 wk10010% (tacrolimus); 16% (anti-TNF); P = 0.55
Cheifetz et al[40]United StatesCyclosporineRetrospective cohort4 wk7115%
CyclosporineRetrospective cohort1 yr7139%
CyclosporineRetrospective cohort2 yr7142%
CyclosporineRetrospective cohort5 yr7146%
Gustavsson et al[49]SwedenCorticosteroidRetrospective cohort3 mo45 (moderate)8.9%
CorticosteroidRetrospective cohort3 mo61 (severe)45.9%
CorticosteroidRetrospective cohort20 yr41 (moderate)48.8%
CorticosteroidRetrospective cohort20 yr33 (severe)33.3%
Van Assche et al[48]BelgiumCyclosporine 4 mg/kgCyclosporine 2 mg/kgRCT2 wk7313.1% (4 mg/kg); 8.6% (2 mg/kg)
Hyde et al[44]United KingdomHydrocortisone-Retrospective cohort5 d21615.7%
Cyclosporine-Retrospective cohort19 mo5016%
Kjeldsen et al[43]DenmarkPrednisolone-Retrospective cohort8 mo5142% (severe disease); 13% (moderate disease)