Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2019; 25(9): 1100-1115
Published online Mar 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1100
Published online Mar 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1100
Table 1 Worksheet for readers to use for interpretation of multidetector computed tomography post-processing images
Presence or absence of obstruction | External hernias |
Presence (≥ 2.5 cm) | Bezoars/stones |
Absence (< 2.5 cm) | Vascular lesions |
Severity of obstruction | Inflammatory lesions |
Mild (2.5 to < 3 cm) | Others (e.g., foreign body, abdominal cocoon, hematoma and so on) |
Moderate (3 to < 4 cm) | Findings of secondary bowel ischemia |
Severe (≥ 4 cm) | Main sings |
Obstruction site | Increased bowel wall attenuation |
Proximal (duodenum to proximal jejunum) | Decreased bowel wall enhancement |
Middle (distal jejunum to mid-ileum) | Vascular embolus/thrombosis |
Distal (distal ileum) | Vascular stenosis/occlusion |
Multisegmental (more than one segment) | Pneumatosis/portomesenteric gas |
Cause | Secondary sings |
Adhesions | Bowel wall thickening |
Neoplasms | Increased bowel wall enhancement |
Intussusception | Mesenteric fluid/haziness |
Neoplasms | Mesenteric vascular engorgement |
Non-neoplasms | Small bowel feces sign |
Volvulus | Ascites |
Hernias | Others (solid organ infarction, free gas and so on) |
Internal hernias | Other findings (fistula, leakage or perforation, pneumoperitoneum and so on) |
Table 2 Use frequencies of multiple post-processing techniques in the protocol 3 n (%)
Assessment parameter | Reader 1 | Reader 2 | P-value |
Presence or absence of SBO (n = 106) | 1 (0.9) | 2 (1.9) | 1.000 |
Severity (n = 106) | 0 | 0 | |
Obstruction site | |||
No (n = 16) | 1 (6.3) | 2 (12.5) | 1.000 |
Proximal (n = 9) | 0 | 0 | |
Middle (n = 37) | 2 (5.4) | 1 (2.7) | 0.556 |
Distal (n = 44) | 3 (6.8) | 4 (9.1) | 0.694 |
Total (n = 106) | 6 (5.7) | 7 (6.6) | 1.000 |
Cause | |||
No (n = 16) | 1 (6.3) | 2 (12.5) | 1.000 |
Adhesions (n = 20) | 2 (10.0) | 1 (5.0) | 0.548 |
Neoplasms (n = 11) | 1 (9.1) | 3 (27.3) | 0.269 |
Intussusception | |||
Neoplasms (n = 9) | 2 (22.2) | 2 (22.2) | 1.000 |
Nonneoplasms (n = 5) | 3 (60.0) | 2 (40.0) | 0.527 |
Volvulus (n = 8) | 6 (75.0) | 7 (87.5) | 0.522 |
Hernias | |||
Internal hernias (n = 6) | 6 (100) | 6 (100) | 1.000 |
External hernias (n = 9) | 1(11.1) | 2 (22.2) | 0.527 |
Bezoars/stones (n = 7) | 0 | 2 (28.6) | 0.127 |
Vascular lesions (n = 8) | 8 (100) | 8 (100) | 1.000 |
Inflammatory lesions (n = 7) | 1 (14.3) | 2 (28.6) | 0.515 |
Total (n = 106) | 31 (29.2) | 37 (34.9) | 0.377 |
Findings of secondary bowel ischemia | |||
Increased bowel wall attenuation | 0 | 0 | |
Decreased bowel wall enhancement | 0 | 0 | |
Vascular embolus/thrombosis | 5 (4.7) | 5 (4.7) | 1.000 |
Vascular stenosis/occlusion | 18 (17) | 15 (14.2) | 0.570 |
Pneumatosis/portomesenteric gas | 1 (0.9) | 2 (1.9) | 1.000 |
Bowel wall thickening | 0 | 0 | |
Increased bowel wall enhancement | 0 | 0 | |
Mesenteric haziness/fluid | 2 (1.9) | 0 | 0.477 |
Mesenteric vascular engorgement | 8 (7.5) | 10 (9.4) | 0.622 |
Small bowel feces sign | 0 | 0 | |
Ascites | 0 | 0 | |
Total (n = 106) | 34 (32.1) | 32 (30.2) | 0.767 |
Table 3 Average confidence scores among three protocols for assessment of small bowel obstruction (n = 106)
Assessment parameter | Protocol 1 | Protocol 2 | Protocol 3 | P-value | ||||||
Reader 1 | Reader 2 | P-value | Reader 1 | Reader 2 | P-value | Reader 1 | Reader 2 | P-value | ||
Presence or absence of SBO | ||||||||||
Presence | 4.8 ± 0.5 | 4.7 ± 0.6 | 0.070 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 4.9 ± 0.3 | 0.103 | 4.9 ± 0.4 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 0.184 | 0.110 |
Absence | 4.6 ± 0.7 | 4.8 ± 0.6 | 0.270 | 4.9 ± 0.3 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 0.164 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 4.9 ± 0.3 | 0.188 | 0.341 |
Severity of obstruction | ||||||||||
No | 4.6 ± 0.7 | 4.8 ± 0.6 | 0.270 | 4.9 ± 0.3 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 0.164 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 4.9 ± 0.3 | 0.188 | 0.341 |
Mild | 4.4 ± 0.7 | 4.5 ± 0.7 | 0.162 | 4.8 ± 0.5 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 0.428 | 4.7 ± 0.6 | 4.6 ± 0.6 | 0.666 | 0.753 |
Moderate | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 4.7 ± 0.4 | 0.323 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 0.710 | 4.7 ± 0.6 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 0.133 | 0.418 |
Severe | 4.9 ± 0.4 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 0.326 | 4.9 ± 0.4 | 4.9 ± 0.4 | 1.000 | 4.9 ± 0.3 | 4.9 ± 0.4 | 0.663 | 0.872 |
Obstruction site | ||||||||||
Proximal | 4.4 ± 0.7 | 4.4 ± 0.5 | 1.000 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 4.9 ± 0.3 | 0.594 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 0.681 | 0.323 |
Middle | 4.2 ± 0.9 | 4.3 ± 0.8 | 0.054 | 4.6 ± 0.5 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 0.058 | 4.4 ± 0.7 | 4.6 ± 0.6 | 0.710 | 0.004b |
Distal | 4.4 ± 1.0 | 4.5 ± 0.9 | 0.083 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 0.570 | 4.6 ± 0.6 | 4.6 ± 0.6 | 0.660 | 0.221 |
Cause | ||||||||||
Adhesions | 3.6 ± 0.8 | 3.7 ± 0.8 | 0.083 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 0.428 | 4.5 ± 0.6 | 4.6 ± 0.6 | 0.163 | 0.001b |
Neoplasms | 4.1 ± 0.7 | 4.2 ± 0.6 | 0.341 | 4.9 ± 0.3 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 0.588 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 4.6 ± 0.5 | 0.588 | 0.001b |
Intussusception | ||||||||||
Neoplasms | 4.1 ± 1.1 | 4.2 ± 1.0 | 0.594 | 4.9 ± 0.3 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 0.594 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 4.6 ± 0.5 | 0.594 | 0.019a |
Nonneoplasms | 4.2 ± 0.8 | 4.0 ± 0.7 | 0.374 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 1.000 | 4.6 ± 0.5 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 0.374 | 0.029a |
Volvulus | 4.4 ± 0.7 | 4.5 ± 0.8 | 0.351 | 5.0 ± 0.0 | 4.9 ± 0.4 | 0.351 | 4.6 ± 0.5 | 4.8 ± 0.5 | 0.598 | 0.041a |
Hernias | ||||||||||
Internal hernias | 3.3 ± 1.4 | 3.5 ± 1.0 | 0.611 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 0.611 | 4.3 ± 0.8 | 4.5 ± 0.5 | 0.695 | 0.002b |
External hernias | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 4.6 ± 0.7 | 0.347 | 4.9 ± 0.3 | 5.0 ± 0.0 | 0.347 | 4.9 ± 0.3 | 4.9 ± 0.3 | 1.000 | 0.054 |
Bezoars/stones | 4.6 ± 0.5 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 0.356 | 5.0 ± 0.0 | 4.9 ± 0.4 | 0.356 | 4.9 ± 0.4 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 0.356 | 0.492 |
Vascular lesions | 3.2 ± 1.3 | 3.3 ± 1.1 | 0.594 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 4.6 ± 0.5 | 0.594 | 4.4 ± 0.5 | 4.3 ± 0.5 | 0.681 | 0.001b |
Inflammatory lesions | 3.9 ± 1.3 | 4.1 ± 1.1 | 0.356 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 4.4 ± 0.5 | 0.172 | 4.3 ± 1.0 | 4.4 ± 0.5 | 0.604 | 0.581 |
Findings of secondary bowel ischemia | ||||||||||
Increased bowel wall attenuation | 4.4 ± 0.5 | 4.5 ± 0.5 | 0.539 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 1.000 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 4.6 ± 0.5 | 0.664 | 0.819 |
Decreased bowel wall enhancement | 4.5 ± 0.5 | 4.4 ± 0.5 | 0.572 | 4.6 ± 0.5 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 0.536 | 4.6 ± 0.5 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 0.721 | 0.282 |
Vascular embolus/thrombosis | 4.0 ± 0.9 | 4.1 ± 1.0 | 0.598 | 4.9 ± 0.4 | 4.8 ± 0.5 | 0.598 | 4.6 ± 0.5 | 4.5 ± 0.5 | 0.598 | 0.010a |
Vascular stenosis/occlusion | 3.8 ± 0.8 | 3.9 ± 0.9 | 0.503 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 0.265 | 4.4 ± 0.5 | 4.5 ± 0.6 | 0.574 | 0.001b |
Pneumatosis/portomesenteric gas | 4.1 ± 0.3 | 4.3 ± 0.7 | 0.447 | 4.4 ± 0.5 | 4.7 ± 0.4 | 0.081 | 4.6 ± 0.5 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 0.681 | 0.814 |
Bowel wall thickening | 4.5 ± 0.5 | 4.6 ± 0.5 | 0.321 | 4.6 ± 0.5 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 0.109 | 4.6 ± 0.5 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 0.254 | 0.059 |
Increased bowel wall enhancement | 4.6 ± 0.5 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 0.231 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 0.161 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 0.536 | 0.441 |
Mesenteric haziness/fluid | 4.3 ± 0.6 | 4.3 ± 0.6 | 0.571 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 0.292 | 4.6 ± 0.5 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 0.571 | 0.003b |
Mesenteric vascular engorgement | 4.2 ± 0.6 | 4.1 ± 0.6 | 0.748 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 4.9 ± 0.4 | 0.494 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 0.716 | 0.001b |
Small-bowel feces sign | 4.4 ± 0.5 | 4.6 ± 0.6 | 0.329 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 4.6 ± 0.5 | 0.576 | 4.5 ± 0.5 | 4.6 ± 0.6 | 0.428 | 0.748 |
Ascites | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 4.6 ± 0.5 | 0.583 | 4.9 ± 0.4 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 0.671 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 0.583 | 0.848 |
Table 4 Inter- and intra-reader agreement (κ value) among three protocols for assessment of small bowel obstruction
Assessment parameter | Inter-reader agreement | Intra-reader agreement | |||||||
Protocol 1 | Protocol 2 | Protocol 3 | Reader 1 | Reader 2 | |||||
Reader 1-2 | Reader 1-2 | Reader 1-2 | Protocol 1-2 | Protocol 1-3 | Protocol 2-3 | Protocol 1-2 | Protocol 1-3 | Protocol 2-3 | |
Presence or absence of SBO (n = 106) | 0.902 | 0.897 | 0.966 | 0.866 | 0.902 | 0.964 | 0.933 | 0.897 | 0.967 |
Severity of obstruction (n = 106) | 0.868 | 0.869 | 0.894 | 0.830 | 0.882 | 0.895 | 0.881 | 0.907 | 0.921 |
Obstruction site (n = 106) | 0.873 | 0.926 | 0.925 | 0.855 | 0.890 | 0.925 | 0.908 | 0.870 | 0.963 |
Cause | |||||||||
No (n = 16) | 0.902 | 0.897 | 0.966 | 0.866 | 0.902 | 0.964 | 0.933 | 0.897 | 0.967 |
Adhesions (n = 20) | 0.725 | 0.820 | 0.820 | 0.725 | 0.786 | 0.759 | 0.820 | 0.820 | 1.000 |
Neoplasms (n = 11) | 0.946 | 1.000 | 0.946 | 0.946 | 0.946 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.946 | 0.946 |
Intussusception | |||||||||
Neoplasms (n = 9) | 0.927 | 0.935 | 0.935 | 0.863 | 0.927 | 0.935 | 0.863 | 0.935 | 0.935 |
Nonneoplasms (n = 5) | 0.738 | 0.883 | 0.883 | 0.883 | 0.738 | 0.883 | 0.738 | 0.883 | 0.883 |
Volvulus (n = 8) | 0.927 | 0.927 | 0.927 | 0.845 | 0.927 | 0.927 | 1.000 | 0.927 | 0.927 |
Hernias | |||||||||
Internal hernias (n = 6) | 0.554 | 0.903 | 0.788 | 0.789 | 0.649 | 0.903 | 0.739 | 0.739 | 1.000 |
External hernias (n = 9) | 0.935 | 0.935 | 1.000 | 0.935 | 1.000 | 0.935 | 0.935 | 0.935 | 1.000 |
Bezoars/stones (n = 7) | 0.917 | 0.917 | 1.000 | 0.917 | 1.000 | 0.917 | 0.917 | 0.917 | 1.000 |
Vascular lesions (n = 8) | 0.554 | 0.927 | 0.751 | 0.522 | 0.419 | 0.845 | 0.518 | 0.711 | 0.845 |
Inflammatory lesions (n = 7) | 0.371 | 0.586 | 0.637 | 0.444 | 0.411 | 0.637 | 0.363 | 0.333 | 0.751 |
Total (n = 106) | 0.733 | 0.861 | 0.848 | 0.748 | 0.760 | 0.848 | 0.772 | 0.797 | 0.924 |
Presence or absence of secondary bowel ischemia (n = 106) | 0.572 | 0.863 | 0.840 | 0.675 | 0.645 | 0.795 | 0.690 | 0.696 | 0.863 |
Table 5 Detection rates for assessment parameters among three protocols for assessment of small bowel obstruction n (%)
Assessment parameter | Protocol 1 | Protocol 2 | Protocol 3 | P-value | ||||||
Reader 1 | Reader 2 | P-value | Reader 1 | Reader 2 | P-value | Reader 1 | Reader 2 | P-value | ||
Presence or absence of SBO | ||||||||||
Presence (n = 90) | 85 (94.4) | 87 (96.7) | 0.469 | 89 (98.9) | 87 (96.7) | 0.312 | 88 (97.8) | 88 (97.8) | 1.000 | 0.378 |
Absence (n = 16) | 15 (93.8) | 14 (87.5) | 0.544 | 15 (93.8) | 16 (100) | 0.310 | 15 (93.8) | 16 (100) | 0.310 | 0.430 |
Obstruction site | ||||||||||
No (n = 16) | 15 (93.8) | 14 (87.5) | 0.544 | 15 (93.8) | 16 (100) | 0.310 | 15 (93.8) | 16 (100) | 0.310 | 0.430 |
Proximal (n = 9) | 8 (88.9) | 7 (77.8) | 0.527 | 9 (100) | 8 (88.9) | 0.303 | 8 (88.9) | 8 (88.9) | 1.000 | 0.570 |
Middle (n = 37) | 34 (91.9) | 33 (89.2) | 0.691 | 34 (91.9) | 35 (94.6) | 0.643 | 35 (94.6) | 34 (91.9) | 0.643 | 0.775 |
Distal (n = 44) | 40 (90.9) | 41 (93.2) | 0.694 | 43 (97.7) | 43 (97.7) | 1.000 | 42 (95.5) | 43 (97.7) | 0.557 | 0.160 |
Total (n = 106) | 97 (91.5) | 95 (89.6) | 1.000 | 101 (95.3) | 102 (96.2) | 1.000 | 100 (94.3) | 101 (95.3) | 1.000 | 0.129 |
Cause | ||||||||||
No (n = 16) | 15 (93.8) | 14 (87.5) | 0.544 | 15 (93.8) | 16 (100) | 0.310 | 15 (93.8) | 16 (100) | 0.310 | 0.430 |
Adhesions (n = 20) | 18 (90.0) | 19 (95.0) | 0.548 | 19 (95.0) | 20 (100) | 0.311 | 19 (95.0) | 20 (100) | 0.311 | 0.434 |
Neoplasms (n = 11) | 10 (90.9) | 11 (100) | 0.306 | 11 (100) | 11 (100) | 1.000 | 11 (100) | 10 (90.9) | 0.306 | 0.597 |
Intussusception | ||||||||||
Neoplasms (n = 9) | 7 (77.8) | 8 (88.9) | 0.527 | 9 (100) | 8 (88.9) | 0.303 | 8 (88.9) | 9 (100) | 0.303 | 0.414 |
Nonneoplasms (n = 5) | 4 (80.0) | 4 (80.0) | 1.000 | 5 (100) | 4 (80.0) | 0.292 | 4 (80.0) | 5 (100) | 0.292 | 0.749 |
Volvulus (n = 8) | 7 (87.5) | 8 (100) | 0.302 | 7 (87.5) | 8 (100) | 0.302 | 8 (100) | 7 (87.5) | 0.302 | 1.000 |
Hernias | ||||||||||
Internal hernias (n = 6) | 4 (66.7) | 3 (50.0) | 0.558 | 6 (100) | 5 (83.3) | 0.296 | 5 (83.3) | 5 (83.3) | 1.000 | 0.045a |
External hernias (n = 9) | 9 (100) | 8 (88.9) | 0.303 | 8 (88.9) | 9 (100) | 0.303 | 9 (100) | 9 (100) | 1.000 | 0.595 |
Bezoars/stones (n = 7) | 7 (100) | 6 (85.7) | 0.299 | 6 (85.7) | 7 (100) | 0.299 | 7 (100) | 7 (100) | 1.000 | 0.592 |
Vascular lesions (n = 8) | 3 (37.5) | 4 (50.0) | 0.614 | 8 (100) | 7 (87.5) | 0.302 | 6 (75.0) | 7 (87.5) | 0.522 | 0.004b |
Inflammatory lesions (n = 7) | 6 (85.7) | 6 (85.7) | 1.000 | 6 (85.7) | 5 (71.4) | 0.515 | 6 (85.7) | 5 (71.4) | 0.515 | 0.857 |
Total (n = 106) | 90 (84.9) | 91 (85.8) | 1.000 | 100 (94.3) | 100 (94.3) | 1.000 | 98 (92.5) | 100 (94.3) | 1.000 | 0.001b |
Presence or absence of secondary bowel ischemia | ||||||||||
Presence (n = 38) | 28 (73.7) | 27 (71.1) | 1.000 | 36 (94.7) | 35 (92.1) | 0.644 | 34 (89.5) | 36 (94.7) | 0.395 | 0.001b |
Absence (n = 68) | 65 (95.6) | 67 (98.5) | 0.308 | 65 (95.6) | 66 (97.1) | 0.647 | 66 (97.1) | 65 (95.6) | 0.647 | 0.928 |
Table 6 Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of three protocols for assessment of small bowel obstruction
Assessment parameter | Protocol 1 | Protocol 2 | Protocol 3 | |||
Reader 1 | Reader 2 | Reader 1 | Reader 2 | Reader 1 | Reader 2 | |
Presence or absence of SBO | ||||||
Sensitivity | 94.4% | 96.7% | 98.9% | 96.7% | 97.8% | 97.8% |
Specificity | 93.8% | 87.5% | 93.8% | 100% | 93.8% | 100% |
PPV | 98.8% | 97.8% | 98.9% | 100% | 98.9% | 100% |
NPV | 75.0% | 82.4% | 93.8% | 84.2% | 88.2% | 88.9% |
Accuracy | 94.3% | 95.3% | 98.1% | 97.2% | 97.2% | 98.1% |
Obstruction site | ||||||
Sensitivity | 94.3% | 96.4% | 98.9% | 96.6% | 97.7% | 97.7% |
Specificity | 78.9% | 63.6% | 78.9% | 94.1% | 78.9% | 84.2% |
PPV | 95.3% | 91.0% | 95.6% | 98.9% | 95.5% | 96.6% |
NPV | 75.0% | 82.4% | 93.8% | 84.2% | 88.2% | 88.9% |
Accuracy | 91.5% | 89.6% | 95.3% | 96.2% | 94.3% | 95.3% |
Cause | ||||||
Sensitivity | 93.8% | 96.3% | 98.8% | 96.6% | 97.6% | 97.7% |
Specificity | 57.7% | 53.8% | 75.0% | 84.2% | 71.4% | 80.0% |
PPV | 87.2% | 86.5% | 94.4% | 96.6% | 93.3% | 95.5% |
NPV | 75.0% | 82.4% | 93.8% | 84.2% | 88.2% | 88.9% |
Accuracy | 84.9% | 85.8% | 94.3% | 94.2% | 92.5% | 94.3% |
Secondary bowel ischemia | ||||||
Sensitivity | 73.7% | 71.1% | 94.7% | 92.1% | 89.5% | 94.7% |
Specificity | 95.6% | 98.5% | 95.6% | 97.1% | 97.1% | 95.6% |
PPV | 90.3% | 96.4% | 92.3% | 94.6% | 94.4% | 92.3% |
NPV | 86.7% | 85.9% | 97% | 95.7% | 94.3% | 97% |
Accuracy | 87.7% | 88.7% | 95.3% | 95.3% | 94.3% | 95.3% |
- Citation: Kuang LQ, Tang W, Li R, Cheng C, Tang SY, Wang Y. Optimized protocol of multiple post-processing techniques improves diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography in assessment of small bowel obstruction compared with conventional axial and coronal reformations. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(9): 1100-1115
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i9/1100.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1100