Kang HS, Koo JS, Lee KM, Kim DB, Lee JM, Kim YJ, Yoon H, Jang HJ. Two-year delay in ulcerative colitis diagnosis is associated with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha use. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(8): 989-1001 [PMID: 30833804 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i8.989]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Ja Seol Koo, MD, PhD, Professor, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Jeokgeum-ro 123, Danwon-gu, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do 15355, South Korea. jskoo@korea.ac.kr
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28, 2019; 25(8): 989-1001 Published online Feb 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i8.989
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients (n = 551)
Characteristics
Value
Male sex (%)
318/551 (55.7)
Age at diagnosis, yr
40.56 ± 16.11
BMI at diagnosis, kg/m2
22.28 ± 3.19
Family history of IBD (%)
51/369 (13.8)
History of smoking (%)
77/443 (17.4)
First symptom
Hematochezia
388/548 (70.8)
Diarrhea
164/548 (29.9)
Abdominal pain
39/548 (7.1)
Diagnostic interval, d (median)
223.28 ± 483.15 (69)
Time from first symptom to hospital visit, d (median)
154.22 ± 379.140 (40)
Time from first hospital visit to diagnosis, d (median)
69.06 ± 295.04 (9)
Mayo score at diagnosis (%)
Mild
179/399 (44.9)
Moderate
204/399 (51.1)
Severe
220/399 (4.0)
Disease extent at diagnosis (%)
Proctitis
253/547 (46.3)
Left side
160/547 (29.3)
Extensive
134/547 (24.5)
Steroid (oral or intravenous) use (%)
250/551 (45.4)
AZA/6MP use (%)
163/551 (29.6)
Anti-TNFα use (%)
50/551 (9.1)
Admission due to flare-up (%)
121/430 (22.0)
Frequent admission due to flare-up (%)
50/551 (9.1)
UC-related surgery (%)
7/551 (1.3)
Clinical remission at the latest follow-up (%)
333/467 (71.3)
Table 2 Diagnostic delay and prognosis
Diag-nostic inter-val
3 mo
6 mo
12 mo
18 mo
24 mo
Early group (%)
Delay group (%)
P value
Early group (%)
Delay group (%)
P value
Early group (%)
Delay group (%)
P value
Early group (%)
Delay group (%)
P value
Early group (%)
Delay group (%)
P value
322
229
401
150
452
99
496
55
509
42
(58.4)
(41.6)
(72.8)
(27.2)
(82.0)
(18)
(90)
(10)
(92.4)
(7.6)
Anti-TNFα use
0.150
0.249
0.847
0.137
0.019
No
288
213
361
140
410
91
454
47
467
34
(89.4)
(93.0)
(90.0)
(93.3)
(90.7)
(91.9)
(91.5)
(85.5)
(91.7)
(81.0)
Yes
34
16
40
10
42
8
42
8
42
8
(10.6)
(7.0)
(10.0)
(6.7)
(9.3)
(8.1)
(8.5)
(14.5)
(8.3)
(19.0)
Admission (flare-up)
0.269
0.203
1.000
0.509
0.703
No
246
184
307
123
353
77
389
41
398
32
(76.4)
(80.3)
(76.6)
(82.0)
(78.1)
(77.8)
(78.4)
(74.5)
(78.2)
(76.2)
Yes
76
45
94
27
99
22
107
14
111
10
(23.6)
(19.7)
(23.4)
(18.0)
(21.9)
(22.2)
(21.8)
(25.5)
(21.8)
(23.8)
Frequent admission
0.150
0.384
0.443
0.806
0.412
No
288
213
362
139
409
92
450
51
461
40
(89.4)
(93.0)
(90.3)
(92.7)
(90.5)
(92.9)
(90.7)
(92.7)
(90.6)
(95.2)
Yes
34
16
39
11
43
7
46
4
48
2
(10.6)
(7.0)
(9.7)
(7.3)
(9.5)
(7.1)
(9.3)
(7.3)
(9.4)
(4.8)
Surgery-related UC
0.457
0.092
0.114
0.523
0.428
No
319
225
398
146
448
96
490
54
503
41
(99.1)
(98.3)
(99.3)
(97.3)
(99.1)
(97.7)
(98.8)
(98.2)
(98.8)
(97.6)
Yes
3
4
3
4
4
3
6
1
6
1
(0.9)
(1.7)
(0.7)
(2.7)
(0.9)
(3.0)
(1.2)
(1.8)
(1.2)
(2.4)
Clinical remission
0.866
0.842
0.509
0.679
0.338
No
191
142
97
37
267
66
300
33
310
23
(71.0)
(71.7)
(29.0)
(28.0)
(70.6)
(74.2)
(71.6)
(68.8)
(71.9)
(63.9)
Yes
78
56
238
95
111
23
119
15
121
13
(29.0)
(28.3)
(71.0)
(72.0)
(29.4)
(25.8)
(28.4)
(31.3)
(28.1)
(36.1)
Table 3 Comparisons of clinical characteristics between the early and delay groups according to the 24-mo diagnostic interval for patients with ulcerative colitis
Total
Early group (< 24 mo)
Delay group (≥ 24 mo)
P value
Sex (%)
0.872
Male
318 (57.7)
293 (57.6)
25 (59.5)
Female
233 (42.3)
216 (42.4)
17 (40.5)
Age (%)
40.56 ± 16.11
40.93 ± 16.20
41.21 ± 14.47
0.903
0.020
≥ 60 yr
80 (14.5)
79 (15.5)
1 (2.4)
< 60 yr
471 (85.5)
430 (84.5)
41 (97.6)
BMI (%)
0.306
< 25 kg/m2
295 (83.3)
268 (82.7)
27 (90.0)
≥ 25 kg/m2
59 (16.7)
56 (17.3)
3 (10.0)
Education (%)
0.561
< University
170 (56.5)
152 (55.9)
18 (62.1)
≥ University
131 (43.5)
120 (44.1)
11 (37.9)
Residence at diagnosis (%)
0.498
Rural
503 (94.2)
466 (94.3)
37 (92.5)
Urban
31 (5.8)
28 (5.7)
3 (7.5)
Family history of IBD (%)
0.782
No
318 (86.2)
291 (85.8)
27 (90.0)
Yes
51 (13.8)
48 (14.2)
3 (10.0)
Smoking (%)
0.008
No
366 (82.6)
339 (84.1)
27 (67.5)
Yes
77 (17.4)
64 (15.9)
13 (32.5)
First symptom (%)
0.540
Hematochezia
No
160 (29.2)
146 (28.9)
14 (33.3)
Yes
388 (70.8)
360 (71.1)
28 (66.7)
0.229
Chronic diarrhea
No
384 (70.1)
358 (70.8)
26 (61.9)
Yes
164 (29.9)
148 (29.2)
16 (38.1)
Diagnosis before UC
0.000
Hemorrhoids (%)
No
487 (94.7)
453 (95.8)
34 (82.9)
Yes
27 (5.3)
20 (4.2)
7 (17.1)
0.066
IBS (%)
No
494 (96.1)
457 (96.6)
37 (90.2)
Yes
20 (3.9)
16 (3.4)
4 (9.8)
Mayo score at diagnosis (%)
0.958
Mild
179 (44.9)
163 (44.9)
16 (44.4)
Moderate + Severe
220 (55.1)
200 (55.1)
20 (55.6)
Disease extent at diagnosis (%)
0.914
Proctitis + left side
413 (75.5))
381 (75.4)
32 (76.2)
Extensive
134 (24.5)
124 (24.6)
10 (23.8)
Table 4 Risk factors predictive of 24-mo diagnostic delay according to the univariate and multivariate analyses
Univariate
Multivariate
OR (95%CI)
P value
OR (95%CI)
P value
Age (≥ 60 yr vs < 60 yr)
7.533 (1.021-55.557)
0.020
14.778 (1.731-126.121)
0.014
Smoking history (no vs yes)
2.550 (1.249-5.206)
0.008
2.688 (1.239-5.747)
0.012
Misdiagnosed as hemorrhoids (no vs yes)
4.663 (1.842-11.803)
0.000
11.066 (3.596-34.053)
0.000
Table 5 Risk factors related to anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha use
Total
Anti-TNFα No
Anti-TNFα Yes
P value
Sex (%)
0.731
Male
318 (57.7)
288 (57.5)
30 (60.0)
Female
233 (42.3)
213 (42.5)
20 (40.0)
Age (%)
40.56 ± 16.11
41.10 ± 16.76
38.36 ± 16.05
0.268
0.913
< 60 yr
278 (50.5)
428 (85.4)
43 (86.0)
≥ 60 yr
273 (49.5)
73 (14.6)
7 (14.0)
Smoking (%)
0.422
No
366 (82.6)
329 (83.1)
37 (78.7)
Yes
77 (17.4)
67 (16.9)
10 (21.3)
BMI (%)
0.667
< 25 kg/m2
295 (83.3)
260 (83.6)
35 (81.4)
≥ 25 kg/m2
59 (16.7)
51 (16.4)
8 (18.6)
Mayo score at diagnosis (%)
0.001
Mild
179 (44.9)
170 (47.6)
9 (21.4)
Moderate + severe
220 (55.1)
187 (52.4)
33 (78.6)
Disease extent at diagnosis (%)
0.000
Proctitis + left side
413 (75.5)
394 (79.3)
19 (38.0)
Extensive
134 (24.5)
103 (20.7)
31 (62.0)
CRP level at diagnosis (%)
0.536
< 5 mg/dL
265 (79.3)
17 (73.9)
282 (79.0)
≥ 5 mg/dL
69 (20.7)
6 (26.1)
75 (21.0)
Steroid use after diagnosis
0.269
< 2 mo
116 (57.1)
31 (66.0)
≥ 2 mo
87 (42.9)
16 (34.0)
AZA/6MP use after diagnosis
0.741
< 2 mo
47 (29.2)
37 (29.8)
10 (27.0)
≥ 2 mo
114 (70.8)
87 (70.2)
27 (73.0)
Diagnostic delay (%)
0.019
< 24 mo
509 (92.4)
467 (93.2)
42 (84.0)
≥ 24 mo
42 (7.6)
34 (6.8)
8 (16.0)
Table 6 Risk factors predictive of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha use according to the univariate and multivariate analyses
Univariate
Multivariate
OR (95%CI)
P value
OR (95%CI)
P value
Mayo score (mild vs moderate + severe).
3.333 (1.550-7.169)
0.002
2.168 (0.956-4.916)
0.064
Disease extent (proctitis + left side vs extensive)
6.241 (3.388-11.496)
0.000
3.768 (1.860-7.632)
0.000
Diagnostic delay (< 24 mo vs ≥ 24 mo)
2.616 (1.138-6.014)
0.019
2.599 (1.006-4.916)
0.049
Citation: Kang HS, Koo JS, Lee KM, Kim DB, Lee JM, Kim YJ, Yoon H, Jang HJ. Two-year delay in ulcerative colitis diagnosis is associated with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha use. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(8): 989-1001