Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28, 2019; 25(8): 989-1001
Published online Feb 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i8.989
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients (n = 551)
CharacteristicsValue
Male sex (%)318/551 (55.7)
Age at diagnosis, yr40.56 ± 16.11
BMI at diagnosis, kg/m222.28 ± 3.19
Family history of IBD (%)51/369 (13.8)
History of smoking (%)77/443 (17.4)
First symptom
Hematochezia388/548 (70.8)
Diarrhea164/548 (29.9)
Abdominal pain39/548 (7.1)
Diagnostic interval, d (median)223.28 ± 483.15 (69)
Time from first symptom to hospital visit, d (median)154.22 ± 379.140 (40)
Time from first hospital visit to diagnosis, d (median)69.06 ± 295.04 (9)
Mayo score at diagnosis (%)
Mild179/399 (44.9)
Moderate204/399 (51.1)
Severe220/399 (4.0)
Disease extent at diagnosis (%)
Proctitis253/547 (46.3)
Left side160/547 (29.3)
Extensive134/547 (24.5)
Steroid (oral or intravenous) use (%)250/551 (45.4)
AZA/6MP use (%)163/551 (29.6)
Anti-TNFα use (%)50/551 (9.1)
Admission due to flare-up (%)121/430 (22.0)
Frequent admission due to flare-up (%)50/551 (9.1)
UC-related surgery (%)7/551 (1.3)
Clinical remission at the latest follow-up (%)333/467 (71.3)
Table 2 Diagnostic delay and prognosis
Diag-nostic inter-val3 mo
6 mo
12 mo
18 mo
24 mo
Early group (%)Delay group (%)P valueEarly group (%)Delay group (%)P valueEarly group (%)Delay group (%)P valueEarly group (%)Delay group (%)P valueEarly group (%)Delay group (%)P value
322229401150452994965550942
(58.4)(41.6)(72.8)(27.2)(82.0)(18)(90)(10)(92.4)(7.6)
Anti-TNFα use0.1500.2490.8470.1370.019
No288213361140410914544746734
(89.4)(93.0)(90.0)(93.3)(90.7)(91.9)(91.5)(85.5)(91.7)(81.0)
Yes34164010428428428
(10.6)(7.0)(10.0)(6.7)(9.3)(8.1)(8.5)(14.5)(8.3)(19.0)
Admission (flare-up)0.2690.2031.0000.5090.703
No246184307123353773894139832
(76.4)(80.3)(76.6)(82.0)(78.1)(77.8)(78.4)(74.5)(78.2)(76.2)
Yes7645942799221071411110
(23.6)(19.7)(23.4)(18.0)(21.9)(22.2)(21.8)(25.5)(21.8)(23.8)
Frequent admission0.1500.3840.4430.8060.412
No288213362139409924505146140
(89.4)(93.0)(90.3)(92.7)(90.5)(92.9)(90.7)(92.7)(90.6)(95.2)
Yes34163911437464482
(10.6)(7.0)(9.7)(7.3)(9.5)(7.1)(9.3)(7.3)(9.4)(4.8)
Surgery-related UC0.4570.0920.1140.5230.428
No319225398146448964905450341
(99.1)(98.3)(99.3)(97.3)(99.1)(97.7)(98.8)(98.2)(98.8)(97.6)
Yes3434436161
(0.9)(1.7)(0.7)(2.7)(0.9)(3.0)(1.2)(1.8)(1.2)(2.4)
Clinical remission0.8660.8420.5090.6790.338
No1911429737267663003331023
(71.0)(71.7)(29.0)(28.0)(70.6)(74.2)(71.6)(68.8)(71.9)(63.9)
Yes785623895111231191512113
(29.0)(28.3)(71.0)(72.0)(29.4)(25.8)(28.4)(31.3)(28.1)(36.1)
Table 3 Comparisons of clinical characteristics between the early and delay groups according to the 24-mo diagnostic interval for patients with ulcerative colitis
TotalEarly group (< 24 mo)Delay group (≥ 24 mo)P value
Sex (%)0.872
Male318 (57.7)293 (57.6)25 (59.5)
Female233 (42.3)216 (42.4)17 (40.5)
Age (%)40.56 ± 16.1140.93 ± 16.2041.21 ± 14.470.903
0.020
≥ 60 yr80 (14.5)79 (15.5)1 (2.4)
< 60 yr471 (85.5)430 (84.5)41 (97.6)
BMI (%)0.306
< 25 kg/m2295 (83.3)268 (82.7)27 (90.0)
≥ 25 kg/m259 (16.7)56 (17.3)3 (10.0)
Education (%)0.561
< University170 (56.5)152 (55.9)18 (62.1)
≥ University131 (43.5)120 (44.1)11 (37.9)
Residence at diagnosis (%)0.498
Rural503 (94.2)466 (94.3)37 (92.5)
Urban31 (5.8)28 (5.7)3 (7.5)
Family history of IBD (%)0.782
No318 (86.2)291 (85.8)27 (90.0)
Yes51 (13.8)48 (14.2)3 (10.0)
Smoking (%)0.008
No366 (82.6)339 (84.1)27 (67.5)
Yes77 (17.4)64 (15.9)13 (32.5)
First symptom (%)
0.540
HematocheziaNo160 (29.2)146 (28.9)14 (33.3)
Yes388 (70.8)360 (71.1)28 (66.7)
0.229
Chronic diarrheaNo384 (70.1)358 (70.8)26 (61.9)
Yes164 (29.9)148 (29.2)16 (38.1)
Diagnosis before UC
0.000
Hemorrhoids (%)No487 (94.7)453 (95.8)34 (82.9)
Yes27 (5.3)20 (4.2)7 (17.1)
0.066
IBS (%)No494 (96.1)457 (96.6)37 (90.2)
Yes20 (3.9)16 (3.4)4 (9.8)
Mayo score at diagnosis (%)0.958
Mild179 (44.9)163 (44.9)16 (44.4)
Moderate + Severe220 (55.1)200 (55.1)20 (55.6)
Disease extent at diagnosis (%)0.914
Proctitis + left side413 (75.5))381 (75.4)32 (76.2)
Extensive134 (24.5)124 (24.6)10 (23.8)
Table 4 Risk factors predictive of 24-mo diagnostic delay according to the univariate and multivariate analyses
Univariate
Multivariate
OR (95%CI)P valueOR (95%CI)P value
Age (≥ 60 yr vs < 60 yr)7.533 (1.021-55.557)0.02014.778 (1.731-126.121)0.014
Smoking history (no vs yes)2.550 (1.249-5.206)0.0082.688 (1.239-5.747)0.012
Misdiagnosed as hemorrhoids (no vs yes)4.663 (1.842-11.803)0.00011.066 (3.596-34.053)0.000
Table 5 Risk factors related to anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha use
TotalAnti-TNFα NoAnti-TNFα YesP value
Sex (%)0.731
Male318 (57.7)288 (57.5)30 (60.0)
Female233 (42.3)213 (42.5)20 (40.0)
Age (%)40.56 ± 16.1141.10 ± 16.7638.36 ± 16.050.268
0.913
< 60 yr278 (50.5)428 (85.4)43 (86.0)
≥ 60 yr273 (49.5)73 (14.6)7 (14.0)
Smoking (%)0.422
No366 (82.6)329 (83.1)37 (78.7)
Yes77 (17.4)67 (16.9)10 (21.3)
BMI (%)0.667
< 25 kg/m2295 (83.3)260 (83.6)35 (81.4)
≥ 25 kg/m259 (16.7)51 (16.4)8 (18.6)
Mayo score at diagnosis (%)0.001
Mild179 (44.9)170 (47.6)9 (21.4)
Moderate + severe220 (55.1)187 (52.4)33 (78.6)
Disease extent at diagnosis (%)0.000
Proctitis + left side413 (75.5)394 (79.3)19 (38.0)
Extensive134 (24.5)103 (20.7)31 (62.0)
CRP level at diagnosis (%)0.536
< 5 mg/dL265 (79.3)17 (73.9)282 (79.0)
≥ 5 mg/dL69 (20.7)6 (26.1)75 (21.0)
Steroid use after diagnosis0.269
< 2 mo116 (57.1)31 (66.0)
≥ 2 mo87 (42.9)16 (34.0)
AZA/6MP use after diagnosis0.741
< 2 mo47 (29.2)37 (29.8)10 (27.0)
≥ 2 mo114 (70.8)87 (70.2)27 (73.0)
Diagnostic delay (%)0.019
< 24 mo509 (92.4)467 (93.2)42 (84.0)
≥ 24 mo42 (7.6)34 (6.8)8 (16.0)
Table 6 Risk factors predictive of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha use according to the univariate and multivariate analyses
Univariate
Multivariate
OR (95%CI)P valueOR (95%CI)P value
Mayo score (mild vs moderate + severe).3.333 (1.550-7.169)0.0022.168 (0.956-4.916)0.064
Disease extent (proctitis + left side vs extensive)6.241 (3.388-11.496)0.0003.768 (1.860-7.632)0.000
Diagnostic delay (< 24 mo vs ≥ 24 mo)2.616 (1.138-6.014)0.0192.599 (1.006-4.916)0.049