Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2019; 25(6): 696-706
Published online Feb 14, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i6.696
Published online Feb 14, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i6.696
Table 1 Patient characteristics
Shaving (n = 36) | Resection (n = 37) | P value | |
Age | 0.4241 | ||
n (%) | 36 (100) | 37 (100) | |
Mean (SD) | 32.42 (6.57) | 33.54 (5.32) | |
Body mass index | 0.6561 | ||
n (%) | 34 (94) | 35 (95) | |
Mean (SD) | 23.83 (3.96) | 24.31 (4.83) | |
Pregnancy | 0.9143 | ||
n (%) | 36 (100) | 35 (95) | |
0 (n) | 22 | 24 | |
1 (n) | 5 | 5 | |
2 (n) | 6 | 4 | |
≥ 3 (n) | 3 | 2 | |
Parity | 0.5683 | ||
n (%) | 36 (100) | 35 (95) | |
0 (n) | 25 | 26 | |
1 (n) | 4 | 6 | |
2 (n) | 6 | 3 | |
≥ 3 (n) | 1 | 0 | |
Preoperative medical treatment | 0.7323 | ||
n (%) | 36 (100) | 37 (100) | |
None | 1 | 3 | |
Progestin | 16 | 16 | |
GnRH analog | 20 | 18 | |
Estrogen | 3 | 6 | |
≥ 2 treatments | 4 | 6 | |
Symptoms of rectosigmoid endometriosis | |||
Dyschezia | 0.0202 | ||
n (%) | 29 (81) | 34 (92) | |
None to mild | 16 | 9 | |
Moderate to severe | 13 | 25 | |
Transit disorders | 0.8932 | ||
n (%) | 29 (81) | 32 (86) | |
None to mild | 14 | 16 | |
Moderate to severe | 15 | 16 | |
Vomiting | 1.003 | ||
n (%) | 29 (81) | 31 (84) | |
None to mild | 27 | 28 | |
Moderate to severe | 2 | 3 | |
Rectal Bleeding | 0.2373 | ||
n (%) | 30 (83) | 29 (78) | |
None to mild | 30 | 27 | |
Moderate to Severe | 0 | 2 | |
Abdominal pain | 0.9432 | ||
n (%) | 32 (89) | 33 (89) | |
None to mild | 8 | 8 | |
Moderate to severe | 24 | 25 |
Table 2 Univariate analysis for characteristics of the lesions on rectosigmoid endoscopic ultrasonography
Shaving (n = 36) | Resection (n = 37) | P value | |
Thickness | < 0.00011 | ||
n (%) | 36(100) | 37(100) | |
Mean (SD) | 4.22 (1.90) | 6.81 (2.61) | |
Width | < 0.00011 | ||
n (%) | 36 (100) | 36 (97) | |
Mean (SD) | 13.70 (5.29) | 19.10 (5.53) | |
Bump | 0.2613 | ||
n (%) | 36 (100) | 37 (100) | |
Presence (%) | 2 (5.6) | 6 (16) | |
Submucosae infiltration | 0.0072 | ||
n (%) | 36 (100) | 37 (100) | |
Presence (%) | 2 (5.6) | 11 (30) | |
Multiple lesions | 0.3583 | ||
n (%) | 36 (100) | 37 (100) | |
Presence (%) | 1 (2.8) | 4 (11) |
Table 3 Logistic regression for significant variables after multiple imputation for missing data
OR | 95%CI | P value | |
Thickness | 1.49 | 1.04-2.12 | 0.028 |
Width | 1.12 | 1.00-1.26 | 0.054 |
Submucosae infiltration | 1.97 | 0.31-12.66 | 0.475 |
Table 4 Receiver operating characteristic analysis for thickness
Cut-off (mm) | Sensibility | Specificity | PPV | NPV | Overall accuracy |
0.9 | 1.00 | 0.03 | 0.51 | 1.00 | 0.52 |
5.2 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.78 |
10.0 | 0.05 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.51 | 0.52 |
- Citation: Desplats V, Vitte RL, du Cheyron J, Roseau G, Fauconnier A, Moryoussef F. Preoperative rectosigmoid endoscopic ultrasonography predicts the need for bowel resection in endometriosis. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(6): 696-706
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i6/696.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i6.696