Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2019; 25(48): 6939-6948
Published online Dec 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i48.6939
Published online Dec 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i48.6939
Marker | Exon number | Target codons | Size of PCR product (bp) | LOD (%) | DCE separation temperature (°C) |
KRAS | 2 | 12, 13 | 112 | 0.03 | 50 |
3 | 59, 61 | 100 | 0.05 | 51 | |
4 | 117, 146 | 150 | 0.05 | 45 | |
TP53 | 5 | 170-187 | 107 | 0.1 | 58 |
6 | 187-224 | 169 | 0.5 | 52 | |
7 | 225-261 | 160 | 0.5 | 52 | |
8 | 262-307 | 151 | 0.03 | 56 | |
APC | 15 | 854-896 | 128 | 0.7 | 48 |
15 | 1275-1308 | 100 | 0.7 | 48 | |
15 | 1290-1335 | 136 | 0.6 | 52 | |
15 | 1389-1446 | 174 | 0.3 | 48 | |
15 | 1430-1463 | 101 | 1 | 48 | |
15 | 1479-1530 | 156 | 1 | 51 | |
15 | 1539-1585 | 141 | 0.8 | 52 | |
PIK3CA | 9 | 542 | 106 | 0.2 | 48 |
20 | 1025, 1031, 1047 | 136 | 0.3 | 49 | |
BRAF | 15 | 600 | 230 | 0.05 | 48 |
CTNNB1 | 3 | 45 | 152 | 0.4 | 52 |
Table 2 Clinical patient data
Characteristics | Value | |
Number of patients | 47 | |
Age | mean, range (yr) | 63.6 ± 12.3, 32-87 |
Gender | Female/male | 16/31 |
Localization of primary | Rectum | 13 |
Colon | 14 | |
Rectosigmoid | 8 | |
Sigmoid | 7 | |
Cecum | 3 | |
Others | 2 | |
Localization of metastasis | Liver only | 35 |
Liver and/or other | 12 | |
Surgical treatment | ||
Number of surgeries1 | 63 | |
Synchronous mCRC | Combined (primary and liver) | 12 |
Primary before metastases | 8 | |
Liver first | 2 | |
Liver in the second stage | 14 | |
Metachronous mCRC | Liver | 24 |
Other metastases | 3 | |
Radicality | R0 | 40 |
R1 | 7 | |
R2 | 16 | |
Recurrence (R0 surgeries) | Number2 | 27 |
Mean time to reccurence, range (mo) | 9.0 ± 5.1, 3-22 |
Table 3 Correlation of surgical radicality and postoperative circulating tumor DNA
Number | State (time to recurrence or follow-up time) | |
R0 | 28 | |
ctDNA positive | 2 | 2 recurrence (6 mo) |
ctDNA negative | 26 | 10 no recurrence (6-36 mo), 14 recurrence (4-22 mo)1 |
R1 | 7 | |
ctDNA positive | 4 | 4 recurrence (3-7 mo) |
ctDNA negative | 3 | 1 no recurrence (5 mo), 2 recurrence (7 or 22 mo) |
R2 | 15 | |
ctDNA positive | 15 | 12/2/1 metastasis/primary tumor/both present |
ctDNA negative | 0 | - |
Table 4 Comparison of circulating tumor DNA and standard detection methods
Number of recurrences | ctDNA | Imaging methods | CA19-9 and/or CEA markers |
13 | + | + | + |
3 | + | + | - |
2 | + | - | + |
4 | + | - | - |
- Citation: Benešová L, Hálková T, Ptáčková R, Semyakina A, Menclová K, Pudil J, Ryska M, Levý M, Šimša J, Pazdírek F, Hoch J, Blaha M, Minárik M. Significance of postoperative follow-up of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer using circulating tumor DNA. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(48): 6939-6948
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i48/6939.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i48.6939