Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2019; 25(48): 6902-6915
Published online Dec 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i48.6902
Published online Dec 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i48.6902
Table 1 Baseline analysis, n (%)
Factors | Patient group (n = 80) | Control group (n = 50) | χ2 /t | P value | |
Gender | 0.264 | 0.609 | |||
Male | 50 (62.50) | 29(58.00) | |||
Female | 30 (37.50) | 21 (42.00) | |||
Age (yr) | 54.6 ± 5.0 | 53.7 ± 4.1 | 1.068 | 0.288 | |
BMI (kg/m2) | 22.86 ± 1.93 | 23.17 ± 2.07 | 0.866 | 0.388 | |
Past medical history | |||||
Hypertension | 25 (31.25) | 10 (20.00) | 1.979 | 0.160 | |
Hyperlipidemia | 13 (16.25) | 6 (12.00) | 0.445 | 0.505 | |
Diabetes | 20 (25.00) | 10 (20.00) | 0.433 | 0.510 | |
Smoking history | 0.081 | 0.776 | |||
Yes | 50 (62.50) | 30 (60.00) | |||
No | 30 (37.50) | 20 (40.00) | |||
History of alcoholism | 0.494 | 0.482 | |||
Yes | 15 (18.75) | 7 (14.00) | |||
No | 65 (81.25) | 43 (86.00) | |||
Place of residence | 0.177 | 0.674 | |||
Urban area | 45 (56.25) | 30 (60.00) | |||
Rural area | 35 (43.75) | 20 (40.00) | |||
Tumor size | |||||
≥ 5 cm | 45 (56.25) | ||||
< 5 cm | 35 (43.75) | ||||
Combined hepatitis | |||||
Yes | 70 (87.50) | ||||
No | 10 (12.50) | ||||
TNM staging | |||||
Stage I+II | 33 (41.25) | ||||
Stage III+IV | 47 (58.75) | ||||
Lymph node metastasis | |||||
Yes | 42 (52.50) | ||||
No | 38 (47.50) | ||||
Differentiation | |||||
Low differentiation | 27 (33.75) | ||||
Moderate + high differentiation | 53 (66.25) | ||||
AFP (ng/mL) | 59.583 | < 0.001 | |||
≤ 200 | 25 (31.25) | 50 (100.00) | |||
>200 | 55 (68.75) | 0 (0.00) |
Table 2 Relationship between cancer susceptibility candidate 9 and pathological data
Factors | Patient group (n = 80) | T | P value | |
Gender | 0.308 | 0.759 | ||
Male (n = 50) | 3.287 ± 0.553 | |||
Female (n = 30) | 3.326 ± 0.553 | |||
Age (yr) | 0751 | 0.455 | ||
< 55 (n = 35) | 3.354 ± 0.504 | |||
≥ 55 (n = 45) | 3.261 ± 0.585 | |||
Tumor size | 4.357 | < 0.001 | ||
≥ 5 cm (n = 45) | 3.489 ± 0.414 | |||
< 5 cm (n = 35) | 3.06 ± 0.611 | |||
Combined hepatitis | 0.575 | 0.567 | ||
Yes (n = 70) | 3.315 ± 0.540 | |||
No (n = 10) | 3.208 ± 0.634 | |||
TNM stage | 4.157 | < 0.001 | ||
Stage I+II (n = 33) | 3.496 ± 0.448 | |||
Stage III+IV (n = 47) | 3.024 ± 0.567 | |||
Lymph node metastasis | 4.557 | < 0.001 | ||
Yes (n = 42) | 3.54 ± 0.445 | |||
No (n = 38) | 3.038 ± 0.538 | |||
Differentiation | 4.387 | < 0.001 | ||
Low differentiation (n = 27) | 3.642 ± 0.405 | |||
Moderate + high differentiation (n = 53) | 3.128 ± 0.535 | |||
AFP (ng/mL) | 3.617 | 0.001 | ||
≤ 200 (n = 25) | 3.609 ± 0.393 | |||
> 200 (n = 55) | 3.162 ± 0.557 |
Table 3 Receiver operating characteristic parameters
Factors | HCC diagnosis | Tumor size | TNM stage | Lymph node metastasis | Differentiation | AFP |
AUC | 0.933 | 0.726 | 0.743 | 0.752 | 0.777 | 0.738 |
SD | 0.026 | 0.060 | 0.059 | 0.055 | 0.051 | 0.054 |
95%CI | 0.882-0.983 | 0.608-0.845 | 0.628-0.858 | 0.645-0.859 | 0.678-0.876 | 0.632-0.844 |
P value | < 0.001 | 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.001 |
Specificity | 87.50% | 95.56% | 48.48% | 88.10% | 92.59% | 100.00% |
Sensitivity | 90.00% | 48.57% | 93.62% | 52.63% | 52.83% | 45.45% |
Youden index | 77.50% | 44.13% | 42.10% | 40.73% | 45.42% | 45.45% |
Cut-off | < 2.672 | < 2.916 | > 2.919 | < 3.057 | < 3.148 | < 3.057 |
Table 4 Multivariate Cox regression analysis
Factors | Univariate Cox | Multivariate Cox | ||||
P value | HR | 95%CI | P value | HR | 95%CI | |
Gender (male vs female) | 0.272 | 1.320 | 1.320-0.804 | |||
Age (< 55 yr vs ≥ 55 yr) | 0.438 | 0.825 | 0.825-0.508 | |||
Tumor size (≥ 5 cm vs < 5 cm) | 0.952 | 1.015 | 1.015-0.624 | |||
Combined hepatitis (yes vs no) | 0.636 | 1.185 | 1.185-0.586 | |||
TNM staging (stage I+II vs stage III+IV) | 0.000 | 4.271 | 4.271-2.391 | 0.006 | 2.501 | 1.308-4.781 |
Lymph node metastasis (yes vs no) | 0.001 | 0.428 | 0.428-0.259 | 0.025 | 0.535 | 0.309-0.924 |
Differentiation (low vs medium + high) | 0.000 | 0.242 | 0.242-0.144 | 0.000 | 0.326 | 0.186-0.569 |
AFP (≤ 200 vs > 200 ng/mL) | 0.025 | 1.914 | 1.914-1.086 | 0.042 | 1.935 | 1.023-3.662 |
CASC9 (< 3.305 vs ≥ 3.305) | 0.005 | 2.023 | 2.023-1.235 | 0.021 | 2.024 | 1.112-3.682 |
Table 5 The top 10 Gene Ontology enrichment functions
Term | Count | P value | Genes |
Negative regulation of transcription from the RNA polymerase II promoter | 9 | 0.001 | PHF19, SQSTM1, CPEB3, E2F7, ESR1, CBX2, SOX6, HMGA2, TWIST1 |
Positive regulation of transcription regulatory region DNA binding | 3 | 0.002 | WNT3A, HMGA2, TWIST1 |
Cytoplasm | 27 | 0.003 | CLSPN, CPEB3, TPM2, BDNF, RNF165, MAPT, STRIP2, HOXA10, FASN, PLCB1, CDC37L1, ARL2, IRAK1, SGK1, MAP2K1, KIF5A, DDX39B, PIM1, SOCS6, ESR1, SNAI2, WEE1, CDC25A, ADM, CA8, PSAT1, DUSP6 |
Positive regulation of transcription, DNA-templated | 6 | 0.009 | RET, MAP2K1, FOXK1, MYRF, ESR1, PLCB1 |
Osteoblast differentiation | 4 | 0.010 | WNT3A, FASN, SNAI2, TWIST1 |
Neuron projection morphogenesis | 3 | 0.011 | BDNF, SGK1, WEE1 |
Transcriptional activator activity, RNA polymerase II core promoter proximal region sequence-specific | 5 | 0.019 | PLAG1, HOXA10, ESR1, HMGA2, MYBL2 |
Negative regulation of sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activity | 3 | 0.021 | PIM1, ESR1, TWIST1 |
Neuron projection | 4 | 0.027 | CPEB3, KIF5A, MAPT, SLC6A4 |
Table 6 The top10 Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes signal pathways
Term | Count | P value | Genes |
MicroRNAs in cancer | 7 | 0.002 | KIF23, CCNE1, MAP2K1, WNT3A, PIM1, HMGA2, CDC25A |
Pathways in cancer | 8 | 0.005 | CCNE1, RET, MAP2K1, WNT3A, ITGA2, LAMC1, AXIN2, PLCB1 |
p53 signaling pathway | 4 | 0.007 | STEAP3, CCNE1, SERPINE1, CHEK1 |
Chagas disease (American trypanosomiasis) | 4 | 0.024 | GNAL, IRAK1, SERPINE1, PLCB1 |
Proteoglycans in cancer | 5 | 0.024 | MAP2K1, WNT3A, ESR1, ITGA2, TWIST1 |
Cell cycle | 4 | 0.030 | CCNE1, CHEK1, WEE1, CDC25A |
PI3K-Akt signaling pathway | 6 | 0.038 | CCNE1, SGK1, MAP2K1, ITGA2, LAMC1, ANGPT2 |
Hippo signaling pathway | 4 | 0.048 | WNT3A, SERPINE1, AXIN2, SNAI2 |
Small cell lung cancer | 3 | 0.081 | CCNE1, ITGA2, LAMC1 |
Progesterone-mediated oocyte maturation | 3 | 0.082 | MAP2K1, CPEB3, CDC25A |
- Citation: Zeng YL, Guo ZY, Su HZ, Zhong FD, Jiang KQ, Yuan GD. Diagnostic and prognostic value of lncRNA cancer susceptibility candidate 9 in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(48): 6902-6915
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i48/6902.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i48.6902