Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 14, 2019; 25(46): 6767-6780
Published online Dec 14, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i46.6767
Published online Dec 14, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i46.6767
Table 1 Clinicopathological characteristics of patients
Variable | Total (n = 82) |
Clinical variables | |
Sex | |
Male | 63 |
Female | 19 |
Age (yr), mean ± SD | 64.7 ± 9.06 |
Tumor location | |
Upper thoracic | 6 |
Middle thoracic | 46 |
Lower thoracic | 30 |
Circumferential extension | |
< 3/4 | 71 |
≥ 3/4 | 11 |
Macroscopic type | |
0-I | 5 |
0-IIa | 2 |
0-IIc | 75 |
Primary treatment | |
EMR-C | 7 |
ESD | 57 |
Surgery | 18 |
Depth of tumor invasion by, EP-LPM | 49 |
NBI with magnification | |
MM-SM1 | 26 |
SM2-SM3 | 7 |
Lymph node metastasis | |
Positive | 3 |
Negative | 79 |
Pathological variables | |
Depth of tumor invasion | |
pTis | 4 |
pT1a | 61 |
pT1b | 17 |
Diameter of primary tumor (mm), mean ± SD | 30.5 ± 18.5 |
Lymph node metastasis | |
Positive | 8 |
Negative | 10 |
Infiltrative growth pattern | |
INFa | 50 |
INFb | 32 |
Histological grade | |
Well | 30 |
Moderate | 47 |
Poor | 5 |
Vascular invasion | |
Positive | 15 |
Negative | 67 |
Lymphatic invasion | |
Positive | 19 |
Negative | 63 |
Table 2 Association between fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography detection of primary tumors and clinicopathological variables
Variable | Positive (n = 29) | Negative (n = 53) | P value |
Clinical variables | |||
Sex | 0.88 | ||
Male | 22 | 41 | |
Female | 7 | 12 | |
Age (yr), mean ± SD | 64.4 ± 11.3 | 64.8 ± 7.66 | 0.86 |
Tumor location | |||
Upper thoracic | 2 | 4 | |
Middle thoracic | 16 | 30 | 0.98 |
Lower thoracic | 11 | 19 | |
Circumferential extension | |||
< 3/4 | 21 | 50 | 0.014 |
≥ 3/4 | 8 | 3 | |
Macroscopic type | |||
0-I | 3 | 2 | |
0-IIa | 25 | 50 | 0.46 |
0-IIc | 1 | 1 | |
Pathological variables | |||
Depth of tumor invasion | |||
Tis + T1a | 14 | 51 | < 0.001 |
T1b | 15 | 2 | |
Length diameter of primary tumor (mm), mean ± SD | 36.4 ± 21.87 | 27.2 ± 15.70 | 0.052 |
Infiltrative growth pattern | |||
INFa | 9 | 41 | < 0.001 |
INFb | 20 | 12 | |
Histological grade | |||
Well | 4 | 26 | 0.002 |
Moderate+poor | 25 | 27 | |
Vascular invasion | |||
Positive | 11 | 4 | 0.001 |
Negative | 18 | 49 | |
Lymphatic invasion | |||
Positive | 14 | 5 | < 0.001 |
Negative | 15 | 48 |
Table 3 Multivariate analysis of the associations between positive fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and pathological variables
Variable | OR | 95%CI | P value |
Circumferential extension | |||
< 3/4 | 3.26 | 0.52-20.49 | 0.21 |
≥ 3/4 | |||
Histological grade | |||
Well | 3.09 | 0.71-13.48 | 0.13 |
Moderate + poor | |||
Depth of tumor invasion | |||
pTis + pT1a | 30.21 | 1.81-504.05 | 0.018 |
pT1b | |||
Infiltrative growth pattern | |||
INFa | 1.52 | 0.38-6.18 | 0.56 |
INFb | |||
Vascular invasion | |||
Positive | 3.42 | 0.24-49.86 | 0.37 |
Negative | |||
Lymphatic invasion | |||
Positive | 0.26 | 0.012-5.41 | 0.38 |
Negative |
Table 4 Diagnostic performance of invasion depth using narrow band imaging magnification before treatment for superficial esophageal carcinoma
Type B1 for EP-LPM | Type B2 for MM-SM1 | Type B3 for SM2-3 | |
Sensitivity | 87.5% (42/48) | 68.4% (13/19) | 46.7% (7/15) |
Specificity | 79.4% (27/34) | 79.4% (50/63) | 100% (67/67) |
PPV | 85.7% (42/49) | 50.0% (13/26) | 100% (7/7) |
NPV | 81.8% (27/33) | 89.3% (50/56) | 89.3% (67/75) |
Accuracy | 84.1% (69/82) | 76.8% (63/82) | 90.2% (74/82) |
Table 5 Diagnostic performance for invasion depth of SM2-3 or lesions indicated for surgery or chemoradiotherapy by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography alone
Invasion depth of SM2-3 | Lesions indicated for surgery or CRT | P value | |
Sensitivity | 93.3% (14/15) | 78.3% (18/23) | 0.37 |
Specificity | 77.6% (52/67) | 81.4% (48/59) | 0.60 |
PPV | 48.2% (14/29) | 62.1% (18/29) | 0.29 |
NPV | 98.1% (52/53) | 90.6% (48/53) | 0.12 |
Accuracy | 80.5% (66/82) | 80.5% (66/82) | 1.00 |
Table 6 Diagnostic performance for lesions indicated for surgery or chemoradiotherapy by Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography alone and Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with magnifying endoscopy-narrow band imaging
FDG-PET | FDG-PET + ME-NBI | P value | |
Sensitivity | 78.3% (18/23) | 78.3% (18/23) | 1.00 |
Specificity | 81.4% (48/59) | 91.5% (54/59) | 0.12 |
PPV | 62.1% (18/29) | 78.3% (18/23) | 0.24 |
NPV | 90.6% (48/53) | 91.5% (54/59) | 0.86 |
Accuracy | 80.5% (66/82) | 87.8% (72/82) | 0.20 |
- Citation: Toriyama K, Tajika M, Tanaka T, Ishihara M, Hirayama Y, Onishi S, Mizuno N, Kuwahara T, Okuno N, Matsumoto S, Sasaki E, Abe T, Yatabe Y, Hara K, Matsuo K, Tamaki T, Niwa Y. Clinical relevance of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging in decision-making regarding the treatment strategy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(46): 6767-6780
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i46/6767.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i46.6767