Toriyama K, Tajika M, Tanaka T, Ishihara M, Hirayama Y, Onishi S, Mizuno N, Kuwahara T, Okuno N, Matsumoto S, Sasaki E, Abe T, Yatabe Y, Hara K, Matsuo K, Tamaki T, Niwa Y. Clinical relevance of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging in decision-making regarding the treatment strategy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(46): 6767-6780 [PMID: 31857778 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i46.6767]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Masahiro Tajika, MD, PhD, Chief Doctor, Doctor, Department of Endoscopy, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8681, Japan. mtajika@aichi-cc.jp
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 14, 2019; 25(46): 6767-6780 Published online Dec 14, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i46.6767
Table 1 Clinicopathological characteristics of patients
Variable
Total (n = 82)
Clinical variables
Sex
Male
63
Female
19
Age (yr), mean ± SD
64.7 ± 9.06
Tumor location
Upper thoracic
6
Middle thoracic
46
Lower thoracic
30
Circumferential extension
< 3/4
71
≥ 3/4
11
Macroscopic type
0-I
5
0-IIa
2
0-IIc
75
Primary treatment
EMR-C
7
ESD
57
Surgery
18
Depth of tumor invasion by, EP-LPM
49
NBI with magnification
MM-SM1
26
SM2-SM3
7
Lymph node metastasis
Positive
3
Negative
79
Pathological variables
Depth of tumor invasion
pTis
4
pT1a
61
pT1b
17
Diameter of primary tumor (mm), mean ± SD
30.5 ± 18.5
Lymph node metastasis
Positive
8
Negative
10
Infiltrative growth pattern
INFa
50
INFb
32
Histological grade
Well
30
Moderate
47
Poor
5
Vascular invasion
Positive
15
Negative
67
Lymphatic invasion
Positive
19
Negative
63
Table 2 Association between fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography detection of primary tumors and clinicopathological variables
Variable
Positive (n = 29)
Negative (n = 53)
P value
Clinical variables
Sex
0.88
Male
22
41
Female
7
12
Age (yr), mean ± SD
64.4 ± 11.3
64.8 ± 7.66
0.86
Tumor location
Upper thoracic
2
4
Middle thoracic
16
30
0.98
Lower thoracic
11
19
Circumferential extension
< 3/4
21
50
0.014
≥ 3/4
8
3
Macroscopic type
0-I
3
2
0-IIa
25
50
0.46
0-IIc
1
1
Pathological variables
Depth of tumor invasion
Tis + T1a
14
51
< 0.001
T1b
15
2
Length diameter of primary tumor (mm), mean ± SD
36.4 ± 21.87
27.2 ± 15.70
0.052
Infiltrative growth pattern
INFa
9
41
< 0.001
INFb
20
12
Histological grade
Well
4
26
0.002
Moderate+poor
25
27
Vascular invasion
Positive
11
4
0.001
Negative
18
49
Lymphatic invasion
Positive
14
5
< 0.001
Negative
15
48
Table 3 Multivariate analysis of the associations between positive fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and pathological variables
Variable
OR
95%CI
P value
Circumferential extension
< 3/4
3.26
0.52-20.49
0.21
≥ 3/4
Histological grade
Well
3.09
0.71-13.48
0.13
Moderate + poor
Depth of tumor invasion
pTis + pT1a
30.21
1.81-504.05
0.018
pT1b
Infiltrative growth pattern
INFa
1.52
0.38-6.18
0.56
INFb
Vascular invasion
Positive
3.42
0.24-49.86
0.37
Negative
Lymphatic invasion
Positive
0.26
0.012-5.41
0.38
Negative
Table 4 Diagnostic performance of invasion depth using narrow band imaging magnification before treatment for superficial esophageal carcinoma
Type B1 for EP-LPM
Type B2 for MM-SM1
Type B3 for SM2-3
Sensitivity
87.5% (42/48)
68.4% (13/19)
46.7% (7/15)
Specificity
79.4% (27/34)
79.4% (50/63)
100% (67/67)
PPV
85.7% (42/49)
50.0% (13/26)
100% (7/7)
NPV
81.8% (27/33)
89.3% (50/56)
89.3% (67/75)
Accuracy
84.1% (69/82)
76.8% (63/82)
90.2% (74/82)
Table 5 Diagnostic performance for invasion depth of SM2-3 or lesions indicated for surgery or chemoradiotherapy by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography alone
Invasion depth of SM2-3
Lesions indicated for surgery or CRT
P value
Sensitivity
93.3% (14/15)
78.3% (18/23)
0.37
Specificity
77.6% (52/67)
81.4% (48/59)
0.60
PPV
48.2% (14/29)
62.1% (18/29)
0.29
NPV
98.1% (52/53)
90.6% (48/53)
0.12
Accuracy
80.5% (66/82)
80.5% (66/82)
1.00
Table 6 Diagnostic performance for lesions indicated for surgery or chemoradiotherapy by Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography alone and Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with magnifying endoscopy-narrow band imaging
FDG-PET
FDG-PET + ME-NBI
P value
Sensitivity
78.3% (18/23)
78.3% (18/23)
1.00
Specificity
81.4% (48/59)
91.5% (54/59)
0.12
PPV
62.1% (18/29)
78.3% (18/23)
0.24
NPV
90.6% (48/53)
91.5% (54/59)
0.86
Accuracy
80.5% (66/82)
87.8% (72/82)
0.20
Citation: Toriyama K, Tajika M, Tanaka T, Ishihara M, Hirayama Y, Onishi S, Mizuno N, Kuwahara T, Okuno N, Matsumoto S, Sasaki E, Abe T, Yatabe Y, Hara K, Matsuo K, Tamaki T, Niwa Y. Clinical relevance of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging in decision-making regarding the treatment strategy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(46): 6767-6780