Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 14, 2019; 25(46): 6767-6780
Published online Dec 14, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i46.6767
Table 1 Clinicopathological characteristics of patients
VariableTotal (n = 82)
Clinical variables
Sex
Male63
Female19
Age (yr), mean ± SD64.7 ± 9.06
Tumor location
Upper thoracic6
Middle thoracic46
Lower thoracic30
Circumferential extension
< 3/471
≥ 3/411
Macroscopic type
0-I5
0-IIa2
0-IIc75
Primary treatment
EMR-C7
ESD57
Surgery18
Depth of tumor invasion by, EP-LPM49
NBI with magnification
MM-SM126
SM2-SM37
Lymph node metastasis
Positive3
Negative79
Pathological variables
Depth of tumor invasion
pTis4
pT1a61
pT1b17
Diameter of primary tumor (mm), mean ± SD30.5 ± 18.5
Lymph node metastasis
Positive8
Negative10
Infiltrative growth pattern
INFa50
INFb32
Histological grade
Well30
Moderate47
Poor5
Vascular invasion
Positive15
Negative67
Lymphatic invasion
Positive19
Negative63
Table 2 Association between fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography detection of primary tumors and clinicopathological variables
VariablePositive (n = 29)Negative (n = 53)P value
Clinical variables
Sex0.88
Male2241
Female712
Age (yr), mean ± SD64.4 ± 11.364.8 ± 7.660.86
Tumor location
Upper thoracic24
Middle thoracic16300.98
Lower thoracic1119
Circumferential extension
< 3/421500.014
≥ 3/483
Macroscopic type
0-I32
0-IIa25500.46
0-IIc11
Pathological variables
Depth of tumor invasion
Tis + T1a1451< 0.001
T1b152
Length diameter of primary tumor (mm), mean ± SD36.4 ± 21.8727.2 ± 15.700.052
Infiltrative growth pattern
INFa941< 0.001
INFb2012
Histological grade
Well4260.002
Moderate+poor2527
Vascular invasion
Positive1140.001
Negative1849
Lymphatic invasion
Positive145< 0.001
Negative1548
Table 3 Multivariate analysis of the associations between positive fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and pathological variables
VariableOR95%CIP value
Circumferential extension
< 3/43.260.52-20.490.21
≥ 3/4
Histological grade
Well3.090.71-13.480.13
Moderate + poor
Depth of tumor invasion
pTis + pT1a30.211.81-504.050.018
pT1b
Infiltrative growth pattern
INFa1.520.38-6.180.56
INFb
Vascular invasion
Positive3.420.24-49.860.37
Negative
Lymphatic invasion
Positive0.260.012-5.410.38
Negative
Table 4 Diagnostic performance of invasion depth using narrow band imaging magnification before treatment for superficial esophageal carcinoma
Type B1 for EP-LPMType B2 for MM-SM1Type B3 for SM2-3
Sensitivity87.5% (42/48)68.4% (13/19)46.7% (7/15)
Specificity79.4% (27/34)79.4% (50/63)100% (67/67)
PPV85.7% (42/49)50.0% (13/26)100% (7/7)
NPV81.8% (27/33)89.3% (50/56)89.3% (67/75)
Accuracy84.1% (69/82)76.8% (63/82)90.2% (74/82)
Table 5 Diagnostic performance for invasion depth of SM2-3 or lesions indicated for surgery or chemoradiotherapy by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography alone
Invasion depth of SM2-3Lesions indicated for surgery or CRTP value
Sensitivity93.3% (14/15)78.3% (18/23)0.37
Specificity77.6% (52/67)81.4% (48/59)0.60
PPV48.2% (14/29)62.1% (18/29)0.29
NPV98.1% (52/53)90.6% (48/53)0.12
Accuracy80.5% (66/82)80.5% (66/82)1.00
Table 6 Diagnostic performance for lesions indicated for surgery or chemoradiotherapy by Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography alone and Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with magnifying endoscopy-narrow band imaging
FDG-PETFDG-PET + ME-NBIP value
Sensitivity78.3% (18/23)78.3% (18/23)1.00
Specificity81.4% (48/59)91.5% (54/59)0.12
PPV62.1% (18/29)78.3% (18/23)0.24
NPV90.6% (48/53)91.5% (54/59)0.86
Accuracy80.5% (66/82)87.8% (72/82)0.20

  • Citation: Toriyama K, Tajika M, Tanaka T, Ishihara M, Hirayama Y, Onishi S, Mizuno N, Kuwahara T, Okuno N, Matsumoto S, Sasaki E, Abe T, Yatabe Y, Hara K, Matsuo K, Tamaki T, Niwa Y. Clinical relevance of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging in decision-making regarding the treatment strategy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(46): 6767-6780
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i46/6767.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i46.6767