Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 14, 2019; 25(46): 6728-6742
Published online Dec 14, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i46.6728
Published online Dec 14, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i46.6728
Table 1 Distinguishing between patients with pancreatic cancer, patients with benign diseases and healthy subjects using HULC
Parameter | AUC | 95%CI | SE | Cut-off | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
Pancreatic cancer group-benign disease group | 0.856 | 0.788-0.923 | 0.034 | > 3.690 | 80.00 | 80.00 |
Pancreatic cancer group-normal group | 0.975 | 0.950-1.000 | 0.012 | > 2.915 | 93.33 | 96.67 |
Benign disease group-normal group | 0.850 | 0.781-0.919 | 0.035 | > 2.659 | 63.33 | 95.00 |
Table 2 Relationship between serum HULC and pathological parameters of pancreatic cancer (mean ± SD)
Clinicopathological parameters | n | HULC | t | P value |
Gender | 0.016 | 0.987 | ||
Male | 43 | 4.994 ± 1.520 | ||
Female | 17 | 4.987 ± 1.451 | ||
Age (yr) | 0.969 | 0.336 | ||
< 60 | 35 | 4.834 ± 1.498 | ||
≥ 60 | 25 | 5.212 ± 1.477 | ||
Tumor size (cm) | 3.923 | < 0.001b | ||
< 2 | 29 | 4.293 ± 1.368 | ||
≥ 2 | 31 | 5.900 ± 0.988 | ||
T staging | 5.248 | < 0.001b | ||
T1/T2 | 38 | 4.354 ± 1.196 | ||
T3 | 22 | 6.093 ± 1.304 | ||
N staging | 1.126 | 0.265 | ||
N0 | 39 | 4.743 ± 1.497 | ||
N1 | 21 | 5.286 ± 1.281 | ||
M staging | 5.120 | < 0.001b | ||
M0 | 32 | 4.221 ± 1.202 | ||
M1 | 28 | 5.872 ± 1.295 | ||
Differentiation | 0.829 | 0.411 | ||
High/medium | 49 | 4.916 ± 1.420 | ||
Low | 11 | 5.329 ± 1.802 | ||
Nerve involvement | 0.401 | 0.690 | ||
No | 55 | 4.971 ± 1.386 | ||
Yes | 5 | 5.283 ± 2.876 | ||
Vascular invasion | 3.660 | < 0.001b | ||
No | 40 | 4.540 ± 1.324 | ||
Yes | 20 | 5.896 ± 1.412 | ||
Smoking history | 0.101 | 0.920 | ||
No | 36 | 4.976 ± 1.405 | ||
Yes | 24 | 5.016 ± 1.637 | ||
History of alcoholism | 0.494 | 0.623 | ||
No | 42 | 4.929 ± 1.64 | ||
Yes | 18 | 5.138 ± 1.084 |
Table 3 Diagnostic value of serum HULC in clinicopathological parameter
Pathological parameters | AUC | 95%CI | SE | Cut-off | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
Tumor size (cm) | 0.844 | 0.746-0.941 | 0.050 | > 5.408 | 93.10 | 64.52 |
T staging | 0.834 | 0.732-0.935 | 0.052 | > 4.819 | 90.91 | 68.42 |
M staging | 0.928 | 0.865-0.990 | 0.032 | > 5.094 | 89.29 | 87.50 |
Vascular invasion | 0.818 | 0.687-0.949 | 0.067 | > 5.408 | 80.00 | 85.00 |
Table 4 Assignment in Cox regression analysis
Factors | Variables | Assignment |
Gender | X1 | Male = 1, female = 2 |
Age (yr) | X2 | < 60 = 1, ≥ 60 = 2 |
Tumor size (cm) | X3 | < 2 = 1, ≥ 2 = 2 |
T staging | X4 | T1/T2 = 1, T3 = 2 |
N staging | X5 | N0 = 1, N1 = 2 |
M staging | X6 | M0 = 1, M1 = 2 |
Differentiation | X7 | High/medium = 1, low = 2 |
Nerve involvement | X8 | No = 1, yes = 2 |
Vascular invasion | X9 | No = 1, yes = 2 |
Smoking history | X10 | No = 1, yes = 2 |
History of alcoholism | X11 | No = 1, yes = 2 |
HULC | X12 | < 4.661 = 1, ≥ 4.661 = 2 |
Table 5 Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of factors affecting the 3-year overall survival of patients with pancreatic cancer
Factors | Single factor | Multiple factors | ||
HR (95CI%) | P value | HR (95CI%) | P value | |
Gender | 1.195 (0.348-4.176) | 0.773 | ||
Age (yr) | 1.549 (0.519-4.628) | 0.438 | ||
Tumor size (cm) | 1.406 (1.092-1.812) | 0.043a | 1.138 (0.857-1.514) | 0.372 |
T staging | 6.459 (1.408-29.575) | 0.017a | 12.852 (2.297-71.238) | 0.005b |
N staging | 0.564 (0.201-1.580) | 0.276 | ||
M staging | 0.292 (0.124-0.689) | 0.005b | 0.357 (0.158-0.735) | 0.013a |
Differentiation | 0.553 (0.157-2.042) | 0.372 | ||
Nerve involvement | 1.008 (0.991-1.022) | 0.368 | ||
Vascular invasion | 6.108 (1.385-24.954) | 0.018a | 2.601 (1.032-6.538) | 0.041a |
Smoking history | 2.270 (0.901-1.792) | 0.175 | ||
History of alcoholism | 2.748 (0.705-10.701) | 0.143 | ||
HULC | 8.356 (2.128-3.846) | 0.002b | 5.817 (2.157-15.756) | 0.003b |
- Citation: Ou ZL, Luo Z, Lu YB. Long non-coding RNA HULC as a diagnostic and prognostic marker of pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(46): 6728-6742
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i46/6728.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i46.6728